Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The health of Saudi youths: current challenges and future opportunities

  • Maziar Moradi-Lakeh1,
  • Charbel El Bcheraoui1,
  • Marwa Tuffaha1,
  • Farah Daoud1,
  • Mohammad Al Saeedi2,
  • Mohammed Basulaiman2,
  • Ziad A. Memish2,
  • Mohammad A. Al Mazroa2,
  • Abdullah A. Al Rabeeah2 and
  • Ali H. Mokdad1Email author
BMC Family PracticeBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0425-z

Received: 29 July 2015

Accepted: 29 February 2016

Published: 5 March 2016

Abstract

Background

The health status of the young people is an important indicator for future health and health care needs of the next generation. In order to understand the health risk factors of Saudi youth, we analyzed data from a large national survey in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

The Saudi Health Information Survey sample included 2382 youths aged 15 to 24 years old. The questionnaire included information on socio-demographic characteristics, risk factors, risky behaviors, chronic conditions, functional status, health care utilization, and anthropometric and blood pressure measurements.

Results

Only 45.9 % of men and 48.4 % of women had normal body mass index (BMI). Men were more likely than women to smoke cigarettes or shisha. The prevalence of daily consumption of at least five servings of fruits and vegetables was 6.6 %. The prevalence of no or insufficient physical activity was 41.8 % in men and 75.6 % in women (P < 0.001). Around 40 % of men and 25 % of women had abnormal blood pressure. Mean BMI and prevalence of insufficient physical activity, current smoking, and hypertension was higher in 20-to 24-year-olds than younger ages. Women were more likely to report that they never use seatbelts (82.2 % vs. 65.4 %).

Conclusions

The prevalence of modifiable risk factors and risky driving behaviors is very high among Saudi youth. If these current behaviors are not reversed during this crucial age period, the burden of disease and injuries will rise in the future. Our findings call for developing health prevention programs for youths in Saudi Arabia.

Keywords

Adolescent Youth Health status Risk factors Saudi Arabia

Background

The United Nations Secretariat defines youths as those aged 15 to 24 years old. The youth period is a time of transition from the dependence of childhood to the independence of adulthood [1]. The health status of the young people in a population is an important indicator for future health and health care needs of the next generation. Patton et al. argued that there are good opportunities for health gains both through prevention and early clinical intervention in this period of life. They recommended a list of indicators for monitoring health status of youth and adolescence [2]. Many of the preventable risky behaviors, such as misuse of alcohol, tobacco, drugs, unsafe sex, unsafe driving, and violence, are usually established during the youth period [3]. Indeed, youth is an important formative period for patterns of behavior that endure into adulthood [4].

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has a young population; more than half of the population is younger than 25 years, and approximately 14 % of Saudis are aged 15 to 24 years old [5]. The KSA burden of disease, injuries, and risk factors study showed that mental and behavioral disorders, injuries, and other non-communicable diseases are the leading causes of disease burden in Saudi youths [6]. Few other studies have reported specific aspects of the health of young people in KSA, such as overweight and obesity [79], nutritional status [1013], or specific diseases. Moreover, most of the previous studies are not generalizable to all Saudi youths due to limitations to specific geographical areas (such as a province or city) or to specific populations (such as students). In order to describe the current status of diseases, health risk factors, and healthcare utilization among Saudi youths (15-to 24-year-old individuals), we analyzed data from a large national household survey in KSA.

Methods

The Saudi Health Information Survey (SHIS) was a cross-sectional national multistage survey of individuals aged 15 years or older performed between April and June 2013. For the purpose of this survey, KSA was divided into 13 regions, and each region was divided into subregions and blocks. All regions were included, and a probability proportional to size method was used to randomly select subregions and blocks. Households were randomly selected from each block. A roster of household members was conducted, and one individual aged 15 or older was randomly selected from the household to be surveyed. If the randomly selected person was not present, surveyors made another appointment to return, up to three times, before considering the household as a nonresponse. For the current study, we selected the subsample of 15-to 24-year-old youths from the SHIS dataset. More details on the methods and other findings of this survey are available in previously published reports [1420].

Ethics, consent and permissions

The Saudi Ministry of Health and its Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study protocol. The University of Washington IRB deemed the study as IRB-exempt, since the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation received de-identified data for this analysis. All respondents consented and agreed to participate in the study. If the respondent was between the ages of 15 and 17 years old, the parent (s) or legal guardian of that individual consented as well.

Trained local health professional staff performed the interviews with same-sex respondents.

The survey included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, a selected list of risk factors, chronic conditions, functional status, and health care use.

We measured self-rated health by asking respondents “In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” with a per-question explanation about its timeframe during the past 30 days.

Individuals were classified into three groups of never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers through two questions: “Have you ever smoked any tobacco products, such as cigarettes, cigars or pipes, or shisha?” and “Do you currently smoke any tobacco products, such as cigarettes, cigars, pipes or shisha?” Interviewers also asked respondents about daily use of shisha, pipe, or flavored shisha, which was considered as daily shisha smoking.

A total of three blood measurements were taken with the participant resting and at five-minute intervals. The guidelines of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used for measuring blood pressure levels [21]. Individuals were classified based on measures of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as having: normal blood pressure (SBP ≤ 120 and DBP ≤ 80), pre-hypertension (120 < SBP < 140 or 80 < DBP < 90), Stage 1 hypertension (140 ≤ SBP < 160 or 90 ≤ DBP < 100), and Stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥ 160 or DBP ≥ 100).

Trained interviewers measured weight and height to calculate body mass index (BMI) as kg/m2. Participants were classified into four groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30), and obese (BMI ≥ 30).

We used the short form of the International Physical Activity questionnaire to measure physical activity in occupational and recreational settings. The respondents were classified into four groups: met vigorous physical activity, met moderate physical activity, insufficient physical activity to meet vigorous or moderate levels, and no physical activity [22].

Respondents were asked, “In a typical week, how much time do you usually spend in front of the television or on the computer?” Respondents were also asked to rate their ability to perform activities. They were asked for their ability to perform vigorous activities (“Does your health now limit you in doing vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, or participating in strenuous sports?”), mild activities (“During the past 30 days, how difficult was it to perform any of the following activities: walking a short distance, standing from a seated position, standing for a short period of time, climbing one step of stairs?”), their usual work or house activities (“During the past 30 days, how difficult was it to perform your work or house activities?”), and specific functional abilities (“Are you able to climb up five steps?”). Interviewers also asked whether or not the respondent required the use of special equipment such as a cane, a wheelchair, a special bed, or a special telephone.

We computed the servings of fruits and vegetables consumed per day from a detailed dietary questionnaire as the sum of the average daily servings. Respondents were asked, “In a typical week, how many days do you eat processed meats such as sausage, or other packaged cold cuts, lunch meats, or deli meats?” and “How many servings of processed meats do you eat on one of those days?” Similar questions were asked for “other processed foods, such as fast foods, canned foods, packaged entrees, or soup,” “fast foods,” and “regular soda or pop that contains sugar, sweetened iced teas, sports drinks, or fruit drinks.”

To assess diagnosed cases of asthma, diabetes mellitus (and type of diabetes), congestive heart failure, renal failure, and cancer, interviewers asked, “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you had [that condition]?” Questions about talking on a mobile or using a handset or hands-free device while driving, following speed limits, and using seatbelts in different settings of driving or traveling in a car were asked in order to assess driving safety.

We used stata 13.1 for Windows (StataCorp LP, TX, USA) for survey analysis. Data were weighted to account for the probability of selection and age and sex post-stratification. We used individual sampling weights to account for the probability of selecting a respondent within a household, the probability of selecting a household within a stratum, and the post-stratification differences in age-and sex-distribution between the Saudi population and the sample.

Descriptive data are reported as percent and standard error (SE) for categorical variables or mean and SE for numerical variables. We used stepwise multivariate logistic regression. We used Chi-square and pooled t tests to compare measures between subcategories of sex or between younger (15-to 19-year-old) and older (20-to 24-year-old) youths.

Results

There were 2382 individuals 15 to 24 years old in the SHIS database (response rate for SHIS: 89.4 %). Table 1 describes the socio-demographic characteristics of this sample. About 14 % of female and 3 % of male youths reported a history of marriage. Among youths under the age of 18, 1.9 % (n = 7) of boys and 3.9 % (n = 20) of girls reported a history of marriage; these percentages were 3.2 % and 13.8 % among all male and female youths, respectively. College education (any education after completing high school) was higher among women than men (P < 0.001), however, the percentage of current (school or university) students was higher in men. The percentage of men who had a paid job was twice that of women. Approximately 27 % of youth classified as “other” work status (including those who had unpaid jobs, were unemployed or unable to work, and homemakers) had college or higher education; the percentage of this other work status was 8.1 times higher for women than for men.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of Saudi youths by sex, 2013

Factor

Categories

Male

Female

Both sexes

N

Weighted %

SE

N

Weighted %

SE

N

Weighted %

SE

Age

15–19 years

677

58.6

1.8

547

48.5

1.9

1224

53.7

1.3

20–24 years

512

41.4

1.8

646

51.5

1.9

1158

46.3

1.3

Education

Primary school or less

153

14.5

1.3

175

14.9

1.4

328

14.7

0.9

Elementary/high school

941

76.5

1.6

824

68.4

1.8

1765

72.6

1.2

College or higher education

94

9.0

1.1

192

16.7

1.4

286

12.8

0.9

Marital status

Never married

1135

96.8

0.6

925

86.2

1.1

2060

91.6

0.6

Currently married

53

2.9

0.5

252

12.3

1.0

305

7.5

0.6

Separated, divorced, widowed

1

0.3

0.3

16

1.6

0.5

17

0.9

0.3

Work status

Employed

145

10.9

1.1

65

5.5

0.9

210

8.2

0.7

Student

933

80.6

1.4

795

70.7

1.7

1728

75.8

1.1

Unemployed

96

6.7

0.9

112

9.0

1.1

208

7.8

0.7

Other

15

1.8

0.6

221

14.9

1.3

236

8.2

0.7

Self-rated health did not vary by age. About 65 % of respondents reported that their health was excellent. Less than half of respondents had normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2). Underweight, overweight, and obesity did not vary significantly by sex. Prevalence of overweight or obesity in men and women was 38.2 % and 43.9 %, respectively. BMI increased with age from 23.5 (±0.2) in those aged 15 to 19 years to 25.1 (±0.2) kg/m2 in those 20 to 24 years old (P < 0.001). Men were more likely than women to smoke cigarettes (16.1 % current smoking in men versus 0.8 % in women) or shisha (5.0 % daily shisha smoking in men versus 1.0 % in women). The average pack years of smoking for current smokers was 3.43 (SE = 0.42) for men and 0.12 (SE = 0.08) for women. Smoking was much higher in the older age group (Table 3).

The prevalence of daily consumption of at least five servings of fruits and vegetables was low in both sexes (6.6 %) and did not vary by age (Table 2). Men reported higher levels of physical activity than women (Table 2); 19.7 % of men and 42.8 % of women were classified as inactive based on their reported levels of physical activity. Overall, physical activity was very low and even lower among older youth (Table 3). Men were more likely to consume fast food and processed food (Table 2). Around 7.0 % (SE = 0.9) of men and 14.9 % (SE = 1.3) of women reported that they never drink soda or pop in a regular week. Consumption of processed food (other than meat) was marginally higher in the older ages (Table 3). Women were more likely to report never using seatbelts as passengers than men (82.2 % vs. 65.4 %). Younger males were more likely to report using handset cellphones and less likely to use seatbelts than older males. High blood pressure and diagnosed cases of asthma were more common in male youth. Those aged 20 to 24 years were more likely to have high blood pressure (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2

Risk factors of health among Saudi youths by sex, 2013

Factor

Categories

Male

Female

P value

N

Percent/Mean

SE

N

Percent/Mean

SE

BMI (%)

<18.5 Kg/m2

164

14.4

1.3

131

12.3

1.3

0.564

18.5-24.9 Kg/m2

544

47.5

1.9

568

50.5

1.9

25-29.9 Kg/m2

284

24.9

1.6

272

23.4

1.6

30+ Kg/m2

157

13.3

1.3

170

13.9

1.3

Smoking (%)

Never smoked

943

81.2

1.5

1169

98.5

0.5

<0.001

Former smoker

42

2.7

0.6

8

0.8

0.4

Current smoker

202

16.1

1.4

11

0.8

0.3

Shisha (%)

Daily users

60

5.0

0.8

15

1.0

0.4

<0.001

Others

1113

95.0

0.8

1178

99.0

0.4

Fruit and vegetables (%)

No servings

407

37.5

1.8

442

39.0

1.8

0.073

1 to 4 servings

718

57.2

1.8

683

53.0

1.9

5 or more servings

64

5.3

0.8

68

8.0

1.1

Activity (%)

No physical activity

255

19.7

1.4

532

42.8

1.9

<0.001

Insufficient

245

22.1

1.6

346

32.8

1.8

Moderate

177

16.1

1.4

113

9.0

1.0

Vigorous

479

42.1

1.9

174

15.4

1.4

Blood pressure (%)

Normal blood pressure

741

64.38

1.81

908

79.54

1.54

<0.001

Prehypertension

362

31.26

1.76

218

18.00

1.45

Stage 1 hypertension

44

3.93

0.74

18

2.00

0.60

Stage 2 hypertension

5

0.43

0.24

5

0.46

0.24

Daily sitting time (hr)

1129

4.4

0.1

1113

4.7

0.1

0.022

Weekly TV and computer time (hr)

1137

7.8

0.4

117

7.9

0.4

0.874

Days eating fast food (per week)

1080

2.6

0.1

1057

1.9

0.1

<0.001

Soda or popa (numbers per week)

1064

2.2

0.1

968

2.5

0.2

0.180

Days eating processed meat (per week)

1120

0.7

0.1

1098

0.6

0.0

0.176

Processed meat (servings per day)

310

1.6

0.1

296

1.5

0.1

0.243

Days eating other processed food (per week)

1125

1.6

0.1

1113

1.4

0.1

0.030

Other processed food (servings per day)

674

1.6

0.1

633

1.4

0.1

0.007

Uses seatbelt as front passenger (%)

Never

789

65.4

1.8

949

82.2

1.4

<0.001

Sometimes

323

30.3

1.7

196

16.1

1.4

Always

59

4.4

0.7

20

1.7

0.5

Uses seatbelt as back passenger (%)

Never

1039

89.1

1.1

1079

91.7

1.1

0.238

Sometimes

111

9.9

1.1

81

7.6

1.0

Always

23

1.0

0.2

9

0.7

0.3

aCarbonated soft drinks

Table 3

Comparison of risk factors of health in 15 to 19 year olds and 20 to 24 year olds in Saudi Arabia, 2013

Factor

Categories

15-19 years

20-24 years

P value

N

Percent/Mean

SE

N

Percent/Mean

SE

BMI (%)

<18.5 Kg/m2

196

17.2

1.4

99

8.9

1.1

<0.001

18.5-24.9 Kg/m2

601

50.4

1.8

511

47.2

2.0

25-29.9 Kg/m2

242

20.9

1.5

314

28.0

1.7

30+ Kg/m2

141

11.6

1.2

186

15.9

1.4

Smoking (%)

Never smoked

1148

94.4

0.9

964

84.0

1.4

<0.001

Former smoker

26

2.1

0.5

24

1.4

0.4

Current smoker

49

3.5

0.7

164

14.6

1.4

Shisha (%)

Daily users

19

1.5

0.4

56

4.8

0.9

<0.001

Others

1199

98.5

0.4

1092

95.2

0.9

Fruit and vegetables (%)

No servings

462

39.8

1.8

387

36.6

1.9

0.472

1 to 4 servings

694

53.9

1.8

707

56.5

1.9

5 or more servings

68

6.3

0.9

64

6.9

1.1

Activity (%)

No physical activity

325

25.1

1.6

462

37.7

1.9

<0.001

Insufficient

321

29.0

1.7

270

25.4

1.7

Moderate

155

12.6

1.2

135

12.7

1.3

Vigorous

389

33.3

1.7

264

24.2

1.7

Blood pressure (%)

Normal blood pressure

909

77.2

1.56

740

65.45

1.88

<0.001

Prehypertension

251

20.8

1.51

329

29.55

1.80

Stage 1 hypertension

21

1.68

0.45

41

4.53

0.89

Stage 2 hypertension

6

0.43

0.21

4

.46

0.27

Daily sitting time (hr)

1155

4.5

0.1

1087

4.6

0.1

0.444

Weekly TV and computer time (hr)

1165

7.6

0.3

1089

8.1

0.4

0.360

Days eating fast food (per week)

1113

2.2

0.1

1024

2.3

0.1

0.459

Soda or popa (Numbers per week)

1074

2.3

0.1

958

2.4

0.2

0.696

Days eating processed meat (per week)

1157

0.6

0.05

1061

0.7

0.1

0.204

Processed meat (servings per day)

304

1.6

0.1

302

1.5

0.1

0.511

Days eating other processed food (per week)

1160

1.4

0.1

1078

1.6

0.1

0.049

Other processed food (servings per day)

679

1.5

0.05

628

1.6

0.1

0.073

Uses handset cell phone while drivingb (%)

Never

100

21.3

2.4

64

11.4

1.7

0.003

Sometimes

329

70.1

2.7

362

75.5

2.6

Always

40

8.6

1.7

46

13.1

2.3

Uses hands-free cell phone while drivingb (%)

Never

348

72.7

2.6

326

68.4

2.8

0.439

Sometimes

109

23.4

2.5

127

28.0

2.7

Always

19

3.9

1.0

19

3.6

1.1

Follows speed limitsb (%)

Never

113

24.1

2.5

95

20.6

2.4

0.387

Sometimes

237

51.5

3.0

279

57.3

3.0

Always

103

24.4

2.7

93

22.1

2.6

Uses seatbelt while drivingb (%)

Never

299

60.6

2.9

239

48.6

3.0

0.007

Sometimes

155

34.6

2.8

206

46.9

3.0

Always

24

4.8

1.2

28

4.4

1.0

Uses seatbelt as front passenger (%)

Never

917

75.3

1.6

821

71.4

1.8

0.248

Sometimes

253

21.9

1.5

266

25.1

1.7

Always

33

2.8

0.7

46

3.5

0.6

Uses seatbelt as back passenger (%)

Never

1098

90.6

1.1

1020

90.2

1.1

0.800

Sometimes

91

8.5

1.1

101

9.1

1.0

Always

16

0.9

0.3

16

0.7

0.2

aCarbonated soft drinks

bOnly men answered this item

The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus was not different by sex (0.8 % in male and 0.9 % in female). There were no significant differences in prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus between those aged 15 to 19 years and those aged 20 to 24 years.

Women were more likely to report having limitations in performing vigorous physical activities (24.7 % versus 12.6 %) and usual housework activities (9.8 % versus 5.2 %) than men. Around 0.17 % of respondents needed special equipment due to health problems. Deafness or trouble in hearing was reported by 3.0 % of men compared to 1.5 % of women. However, there were no significant difference between those aged 15 to 19 years and those aged 20 to 24 years (Table 4).
Table 4

Indicators of physical functioning in Saudi youths by sex, 2013

Factors

Categories

Male

Female

P value

N

Percent

SE

N

Percent

SE

Limitation in vigorous physical activity

No

1032

87.4

1.2

871

75.3

1.7

<0.001

Yes

145

12.6

1.2

272

24.7

1.7

Need for special equipment

No

1176

99.7

0.1

1183

99.9

0.0

0.056

Yes

7

0.3

0.1

2

0.1

0.0

Able to climb five steps?

Without any difficulty

1148

96.0

0.8

1099

94.7

0.8

0.164

With a little difficulty

26

2.3

0.5

60

4.1

0.7

With some difficulty

11

1.5

0.6

10

1.1

0.4

With much difficulty

2

0.1

0.0

2

0.1

0.1

Unable to do

2

0.1

0.1

0

0.0

_

Difficulty in performing house/work activities?

Without any difficulty

1100

94.8

0.9

1018

90.2

1.1

0.007

With a little difficulty

40

3.9

0.8

102

7.1

0.9

With some difficulty

9

1.0

0.5

27

2.5

0.6

With much difficulty

3

0.3

0.2

4

0.2

0.1

Unable to do

2

0.1

0.1

0

0.0

_

Wears glasses or contact lens

No

1050

89.4

1.1

1027

85.1

1.3

0.016

Yes

133

10.6

1.1

162

14.9

1.3

Far vision

No difficulty

1077

91.6

1.0

1049

88.9

1.2

0.342

Some difficulty

105

8.4

1.0

133

11.1

1.2

Near vision

No difficulty

1119

95.3

0.7

1098

92.7

1.0

0.076

Some difficulty

63

4.7

0.7

86

7.3

1.0

Deafness or trouble hearing

No

1148

97.0

0.7

1164

98.6

0.4

0.022

Yes

39

3.0

0.7

27

1.5

0.4

Use of health care services was not significantly different between men and women. A notable proportion of respondents (46.2 % of men and 44.1 % of women) had visited a hospital for medical attention in the past 12 months. Injury was the reason for visiting a hospital in 11.7 % (n = 80) of men compared to 2 % (n = 17) of women. Injury was also a more common reason for visiting a hospital for those aged 15 to 19 years than for those aged 20 to 24 years (8.8 % versus 4.8 %). Outpatient clinic and physician office visits were less frequently reported than hospital visits (Table 5). As for hospital visits, injury was a more common reason for males than females to visit an outpatient clinic (7.6 % versus 1.7 %) or a physician office (9.4 % versus 1.9 %). Both routine medical checkups and oral examinations were more common in those aged 20 to 24 years compared to those aged 15 to 19 years (Table 5).
Table 5

Comparison of health care use between 15 to 19 year olds and 20 to 24 year olds in Saudi Arabia, 2013

Health care

Time range

15-19 years

20-24 years

P value

N

Percent

SE

N

Percent

SE

Routine checkup

Within 12 months

84

7.3

1.0

118

10.6

1.2

<0.001

1 to 5 years

64

5.2

0.8

108

9.4

1.1

Never or >5 yr earlier

993

87.5

1.3

861

80.0

1.5

Hospital

Within 12 months

481

46.7

1.9

460

43.4

2.0

0.347

1 to 5 years

216

17.7

1.5

224

20.5

1.6

Never or >5 yr earlier

427

35.6

1.8

386

36.1

1.9

Outpatient clinic

Within 12 months

499

46.1

1.9

451

39.7

2.0

0.045

1 to 5 years

195

15.8

1.4

200

19.5

1.6

Never or >5 yr earlier

416

38.1

1.8

401

40.8

2.0

Physician office visit

Within 12 months

483

42.8

1.9

455

42.0

2.0

0.787

1 to 5 years

158

12.7

1.3

143

14.0

1.5

Never or >5 yr earlier

449

44.5

1.9

427

44.0

2.0

Oral examination

Within 12 months

103

9.1

1.1

151

13.2

1.3

0.014

Never or >1 yr earlier

1112

90.9

1.1

996

86.8

1.3

Discussion

In a national study in KSA, we showed a high prevalence of health risk factors (overweight and obesity, low physical activity, low consumption of fruits and vegetables, high prevalence of high abnormal blood pressure) in Saudi youth. We found that these risk factors are increasing with age and are higher in older youths. Furthermore, we demonstrated that youth are engaging in highly risky behaviors while driving. These findings are of great concern for the KSA health authorities. Our findings call for developing and implementing youth-appropriate programs to reduce the burden of disease and to avoid future health challenges.

Although prevalence of overweight and obesity has been previously reported as higher in females compared to males in Saudi adolescents [23] and Saudi adults [17], the prevalence was not considerably different between men and women in our study. This might be due to the decreasing trend of obesity in younger age cohorts of both sexes, which is more prominent in women [17]. Prevalence of obesity was similar to adolescents in the United States (13.7 %), but overweight in our sample (24.1 %) was more common compared to the US adolescent population (16.6 %) [24]. Current smoking among US high school adolescents is higher than in Saudi Arabia (15.7 % versus 8.6 %); prevalence of current smoking in US men and women is similar (16.4 % and 15.0 %, respectively), while it is very different in KSA (16.1 % in men and 0.8 % in women) [24].

Consumption of fast food and soda or sweetened beverages was high among Saudi youth. Those who never drink soda or pop in KSA were less than US adolescents (10.9 % vs. 22.3 %, respectively) [24]. There was a combination of low physical activity, overweight and obesity, and unhealthy diet in many of the Saudi youths in our study; Washi et al. reported a non-healthy diet with high carbohydrate and fat intake and low calcium, iron, and zinc intake in Saudi adolescents [13]. Pearson and Biddle showed a strong association between sedentary behavior and unhealthy diet [25]. In Saudi Arabia, dietary risk factors, high BMI levels, and high blood sugar levels are amongst the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years [6]. The fact that these risk factors are prevalent at younger ages deserves immediate attention and intervention. Low physical activity was much more prevalent in female youth; public health authorities should push all related sectors to facilitate access for women to health facilities and encourage an active lifestyle for women.

Injuries, especially transport injuries, are among leading causes of mortality and morbidity among youths, both worldwide and in Saudi Arabia [6, 26]. We observed a high prevalence of risky driving and traveling behaviors in Saudi youth. Around three-quarters of young drivers reported that they do not follow speed limits. Moreover, most of the studied Saudi youths reported that they do not use seatbelts as a driver or as a passenger; the percentage of reporting never use of seatbelt as passenger in KSA was 73.5 %, compared to 7.6 % in US adolescents [24]. The prevalence is likely to be even higher in reality, as some youth may not report this illegal behavior to interviewers. There is an immediate need for law enforcement by relevant authorities and proper education around the importance of safe driving and traveling behaviors [15].

Hospital/emergency room visits were high among both male and female youths. In fact, they were reported more than routine medical checkups and oral health examinations. This practice is not sustainable, even in a wealthy country like KSA. Clearly, many youth are experiencing health problems that they ignore until they need to seek emergency or hospital care. The fact that health care is free in KSA calls for the Ministry of Health to encourage the use of preventive care rather than emergency care. A message to educate and inform youth about the value of preventive care is urgently needed, perhaps through school, as the majority of Saudis attend school [27]. On the other hand, we did not collect further data about the reasons for emergency room or hospital visits; some of these visits might be due to non-urgent problems that can be addressed through outpatient visits.

The unemployment rate among youth in our study was lower than what others have previously reported [5]. However, with KSA’s young population, more jobs will be required in the near future. Our study showed that women were less likely to be employed than men. Other studies have explained a gender-based mismatch between education and job opportunities in the Arab world [28]. Future employment plans should take into account the growing population of educated women that will enter the market. Marital status is one of the important demographic indicators that affects social, mental, and physical health. In a country with Islamic rules such as Saudi Arabia, marriage is one of the very few socio-culturally acceptable ways of having a sexual relationship. It potentially affects education, employment, and fertility in the following years.

There is a growing evidence base for action to improve the health of adolescents and young people [29]. The interventions might target diseases, proximal risk factors, or determinants of health. Such interventions will influence incidence and severity of diseases (especially non-communicable diseases) and injuries at older ages as well as affecting the health status of the current youth population [3, 30]. As part of related interventions, health care providers need to achieve core competencies for appropriate approach to and management of health and development problems of young people; specific attitudes, knowledge, and skills are required for working with youth [31]. The Ministry of Health should ensure that providers are trained in such skills.

This study has some limitations. First, our data are cross-sectional, hence we cannot assess causality. Second, many of our behavioral data, such as smoking, seatbelt use, or physical activity, are self-reported and subject to recall and social desirability biases. Despite these limitations, our study is based on a large sample size and used a standardized methodology for all its measures. We extracted all indices related to adolescence and youth health available through the SHIS data [2], however, there were not enough data on some important aspects of youth health such as sexual behaviors, violence, mental health, and alcohol or drug use.

Conclusion

The prevalence of health risk factors and risky driving behaviors are very high among Saudi youths. If these current behaviors are not reversed during this crucial age period, the burden of disease will increase in KSA in coming years. Our findings call for immediate interventions to reverse these trends. Youth is an important phase in our lives. It has many challenges and requires more attention and resources for intervention. However, along with the challenges are great opportunities for the future, and changes made in this generation will shape the future health and well-being in the Kingdom. Our findings call for a focused program for youth health in KSA. Prevention should be at the forefront of all activities for better youth health and future health of the Kingdom.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Katherine Muller and Amelia Vander Zanden at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation for editing the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington
(2)
Ministry of Health of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

References

  1. Definition of youth [http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/youth/fact-sheets/youth-definition.pdf].
  2. Patton GC, Coffey C, Cappa C, Currie D, Riley L, Gore F, et al. Health of the world’s adolescents: A synthesis of internationally comparable data. Lancet. 2012;379:1665–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Catalano RF, Fagan AA, Gavin LE, Greenberg MT, Irwin CE, Ross DA, et al. Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. Lancet. 2012;379:1653–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Nutbeam D. Indicators of adolescent health: expanding the framework for assessing health status among young people. Promot Educ. 1997;4:10–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Murphy C. Saudi Arabia’s Youth and the Kingdom’s Future. 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Memish ZA, Jaber S, Mokdad AH, AlMazroa MA, Murray CJL, Al Rabeeah AA, et al. Burden of disease, injuries, and risk factors in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 1990-2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E169.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Abalkhail B. Overweight and obesity among Saudi Arabian children and adolescents between 1994 and 2000. East Mediterr Health J Rev Santé Méditerranée Orient Al-Majallah Al-Ṣiḥḥīyah Li-Sharq Al-Mutawassiṭ. 2002;8:470–9.Google Scholar
  8. Al-Daghri N, Alokail M, Al-Attas O, Sabico S, Kumar S. Establishing abdominal height cut-offs and their association with conventional indices of obesity among Arab children and adolescents. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30:209–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. El Mouzan MI, Foster PJ, Al Herbish AS, Al Salloum AA, Al Omer AA, Qurachi MM, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Saudi children and adolescents. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30:203–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Abahussain NA, Musaiger AO, Nicholls PJ, Stevens R. Nutritional status of adolescent girls in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Nutr Health. 1999;13:171–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farahat FM, Joshi KP, Al-Mazrou FF. Assessment of nutritional status and lifestyle pattern among Saudi Arabian school children. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1298–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Madani KA, Al-Amoudi NS, Kumosani TA. The state of nutrition in Saudi Arabia. Nutr Health. 2000;14:17–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Washi SA, Ageib MB. Poor diet quality and food habits are related to impaired nutritional status in 13- to 18-year-old adolescents in Jeddah. Nutr Res N Y N. 2010;30:527–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. El Bcheraoui C, Basulaiman M, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Robinson M, Jaber S, et al. Status of the diabetes epidemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. Int J Public Health. 2014;59:1011–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. El Bcheraoui C, Basulaiman M, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Robinson M, Jaber S, et al. Get a license, buckle up, and slow down: risky driving patterns among Saudis. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014.Google Scholar
  16. El Bcheraoui C, Memish ZA, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Robinson M, Jaber S, et al. Hypertension and its associated risk factors in the kingdom of saudi arabia, 2013: a national survey. Int J Hypertens. 2014;2014:564679.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Memish ZA, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Robinson M, Daoud F, Jaber S, et al. Obesity and associated factors--Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11, E174.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Basulaiman M, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Robinson M, Daoud F, Jaber S, et al. Hypercholesterolemia and its associated risk factors-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24:801–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moradi-Lakeh M, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Al Saeedi M, Basulaiman M, et al. Tobacco consumption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013: findings from a national survey. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:611.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Moradi-Lakeh M, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Al Saeedi M, Basulaiman M, et al. Self-Rated Health Among Saudi Adults: Findings from a National Survey, 2013. J Community Health. 2015;40(5):920–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Centre for disease control and prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANE). Health Tech/Blood Pressure Procedures Manual. 2009.Google Scholar
  22. Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;195:3508–1381.Google Scholar
  23. Mahfouz AA, Shatoor AS, Khan MY, Daffalla AA, Mostafa OA, Hassanein MA. Nutrition, physical activity, and gender risks for adolescent obesity in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol Off J Saudi Gastroenterol Assoc. 2011;17:318–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Kawkins J, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(4):1–168.Google Scholar
  25. Pearson N, Biddle SJH. Sedentary behavior and dietary intake in children, adolescents, and adults. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:178–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;385(9963):117–71.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, AlMazroa MA, Al Saeedi M, Memish ZA, et al. Low uptake of periodic health examinations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2015;4:342–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Obermeyer CM, Bott S, Sassine AJ. Arab Adolescents: Health, Gender, and Social Context. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2015;57:252–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bustreo F, Chestnov O. Emerging Issues in Adolescent Health and the Positions and Priorities of the World Health Organization. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dick B, Ferguson BJ. Health for the World’s Adolescents: A Second Chance in the Second Decade. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:3–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. World Health Organization. Core Competencies in Adolescent Health and Development for Primary Care Providers. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Moradi-Lakeh et al. 2016