Skip to main content

Developing a community-based psycho-social intervention with older people and third sector workers for anxiety and depression: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

One-in-five people in the UK experience anxiety and/or depression in later life. However, anxiety and depression remain poorly detected in older people, particularly in those with chronic physical ill health. In the UK, a stepped care approach, to manage common mental health problems, is advocated which includes service provision from non-statutory organisations (including third/voluntary sector). However, evidence to support such provision, including the most effective interventions, is limited. The qualitative study reported here constitutes the first phase of a feasibility study which aims to assess whether third sector workers can deliver a psychosocial intervention to older people with anxiety and/or depression. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore the views of older people and third sector workers about anxiety and depression among older people in order to refine an intervention to be delivered by third sector workers.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with participants recruited through purposive sampling from third sector groups in North Staffordshire. Interviews were digitally recorded with consent, transcribed and analysed using principles of constant comparison.

Results

Nineteen older people and 9 third sector workers were interviewed. Key themes included: multiple forms of loss, mental health as a personal burden to bear, having courage and providing/receiving encouragement, self-worth and the value of group activities, and tensions in existing service provision, including barriers and gaps.

Conclusions

The experience of loss was seen as central to feelings of anxiety and depression among community-dwelling older people. This study contributes to the evidence pointing to the scale and severity of mental health needs for some older people which can arise from multiple forms of loss, and which present a significant challenge to health, social care and third sector services. The findings informed development of a psychosocial intervention and training for third sector workers to deliver the intervention.

Peer Review reports

Background

One-in-five older people (65+ years) in the UK experience anxiety and/or depression with prevalence increasing with age [1,2,3,4,5]. Experiences of chronic disease, disability and bereavement have been identified as risk factors for anxiety and depression in later life [6]. Furthermore, anxiety and depression prevalence is reported to be higher among people with co-morbid long term conditions (LTC) [7, 8]. As 60% of people in England aged 60 years and over experience at least one LTC; older people are at risk of developing anxiety and/or depression [9].

Anxiety and depression in older people remain poorly detected and managed [10], particularly for people with chronic physical ill health [11]. If untreated, anxiety and depression may lead to poor quality of life which impacts on increased use of health and social care services and raised mortality [12,13,14]. Treatment of depression has the potential to improve mortality from all causes in older people [15]. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for depression [16] and anxiety [17] advocate a stepped care approach to manage these mental health problems. For mild to moderate symptoms, patients are to be offered advice about lifestyle at step one and low intensity interventions at step two; non-statutory bodies (including third sector, voluntary organisations) may be involved in provision of these services. Task shifting mental health care to community-based programmes has been shown to be effective in low and middle income countries [18, 19]; however, evidence from the UK is limited.

Diagnosis and treatment led by a narrow bio-medical model may overlook important social and contextual factors of mental health, which can inform management [20]. For instance, participation in meaningful activities has an important role in supporting quality of life [21] and mental health and wellbeing in later life [22,23,24,25]. Maintaining social participation (social interaction beyond spousal relationship) and meaningful activities (e.g. volunteer roles) have been identified as important following widowhood to support coping [26]. As such, interventions based on increasing participation in meaningful activities have been recommended as a basis for interventions for people with mental health problems, such as depression [27]. Community-based interventions have also been shown to have additional benefits for social inclusion, social cohesion and supporting a sense of belonging and connection [21, 25, 27,28,29,30,31,32].

The aim of this qualitative study is to explore the views of older people and third sector workers about anxiety and depression among older people in order to refine an intervention to be delivered by Age UK North Staffordshire workers. The qualitative study forms part of a feasibility study, the NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression (NOTEPAD) [33].

Methods

Design and sampling strategy

A patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group was established to support the development of this study. The group provided advice on the design of participant-facing documents (e.g. participant information sheet, consent forms) and on the language and terminology used. The PPIE group suggested that the phrases ‘low mood’ and ‘stress’ be used with older people rather than depression and anxiety, respectively, in order to reduce stigma and support engagement. The research team acknowledged that, in particular, ‘stress’ may not be clinically equivalent to anxiety but that there would be sufficient overlap to support exploration. For the remainder of the article the terms ‘low mood’ and ‘stress’ will be used (unless citing the work of others).

This qualitative study explored personal experiences of and perspectives on low mood and stress among older people through semi-structured interviews. A purposive sampling strategy was implemented to recruit two groups of participants: (1) older people (65+ years) with an interest in talking about low mood and stress in later life, and; (2) third sector workers (either working in paid employment or in a voluntary capacity) from organisations providing community-based support to older people, including those with low mood and stress.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Keele University Ethical Review Panel on 23rd September 2015. The article adheres to the Bio Med Central RATS criteria for reporting of qualitative studies (http://old.biomedcentral.com/authors/rats). Recruitment and data collection took place in North Staffordshire between September and November 2015.

(1) Recruitment of older people

The first and second authors attended group activities (e.g. keep fit, line dancing classes, knitting groups, and luncheon clubs) hosted in North Staffordshire by third sector organisations with which the research team had established links (e.g. Age UK North Staffordshire, Royal Voluntary Service). The researchers explained the study and distributed participant information packs comprising an invitation letter, a participant information sheet, consent to further contact slip and a prepaid envelope. Snowball sampling [34] was used to reach older people who did not attend groups and participant information packs were provided to group attendees to share with friends. Packs were also provided to non-statutory workers to distribute to service users outside of these groups (e.g. befriending, sign-posting services). On return of consent to further contact slips, prospective participants were contacted to confirm willingness to participate and to arrange a convenient time and place for the interview, typically a private room at the community-based venue where group activities were held. Written consent was recorded at the start of the interview.

(2) Recruitment of third sector workers

Workers were identified through third sector organisations (e.g. Age UK North Staffordshire, Royal Voluntary Service). Worker information packs were distributed via team managers within these organisations and contained equivalent information to the participant information packs for older people (as described). Again, on return of consent to contact slips, prospective participants were contacted to confirm willingness to participate and to arrange a convenient time and place for the interview, typically a private room at their place of work. Written consent was recorded at the start of the interview.

Data collection

Topic guides were used to semi-structure the interviews with all participants (Table 1):

Table 1 Topic guides for semi-structured interviews

Data analysis

All interviews were digitally recorded with consent and transcribed by an external company. The study was exploratory in nature; thus, thematic analysis was used to analyse the data [35]. Coding of the transcripts was undertaken by five members of the research team from different professional backgrounds to increase trustworthiness of the analysis [36]. All transcripts were coded inductively by the first and second authors; the third, fourth and last author independently coded five transcripts each. Each data set (older people, third sector workers) was coded separately, and then comparisons across the two data sets were made. Themes emerging from this level of coding were then discussed in team meetings and modified to account for alternative interpretations. The key themes and a model of the analysis were agreed.

Results

Interviews were completed with 19 older people (18 female; mean age 74 years at point of participation) and 9 third sector workers (8 female; 4 in paid employment, 4 volunteers). The response to the recruitment strategy was low for males and older adults who were not already participating in organised groups (see limitations for further discussion); research data from all participants was included in the analysis.

Analysis of the interview data revealed themes of: multiple forms of loss, mental health as a personal burden, having courage and providing/receiving encouragement, self-worth and the value of groups, and tensions to accessing group activities (including barriers and gaps). Each theme is described below; data is given to support analysis, and each data extract labelled with a participant identifier.

A conceptual model was developed to map older person and third sector worker perspectives on older person responses to loss (a key contributing factor to low mood and stress). The contribution of this analysis to the refinement of the intervention and the NOTEPAD feasibility study is described.

Experiencing multiple forms of loss

The older people we interviewed described multiple forms of loss in later life, which contributed to feelings of low mood and stress. The forms of loss described included: loss of significant relationships (i.e. spouses, friends, confidantes), changes to physical health and mobility (e.g. osteoarthritis, joint replacement operations), changes in capabilities and established activities (e.g. driving, employment roles), and loss of control of daily life (e.g. burden of providing caregiving).

Typically, older people experienced combinations of losses. For example, one older person described a sequence of losses, which impacted how she dealt with her own low mood:

“My husband died and I had a hip replacement and then three months after, I fell and broke the other [hip]… I’m trying to get over that now but, of course, I’ve had to give my work up, which doesn’t help because you’re more or less stuck in the house 24 hours.” [Older Person 14].

The experience of successive losses contributed to a sense of decline, of being on a “downward slope” [Older Person 6] or in a “downward trend” [Older Person 17].

This experience of loss was typically experienced as a crossroads where the older person found themselves thrown back onto their own resources. They described coming to the realisation that they would have to choose whether to make a conscious effort to get out of the house and forge new social links; or avoid participation and stay indoors. Several interviewees reflected that they feared the latter choice could result in ‘giving up’ and becoming isolated.

Workers recognised the habitual nature of staying indoors:

“A lot of people I see are in their late 80s early 90s they have become used to staying at home, I wouldn’t say they’re house-bound, they’ve got out of the habit of going out.” [Worker 4].

The worker implies an important distinction between older people who are house-bound (i.e. due to physical health impairment) and those who are “out of the habit” of getting out from their home environment. Thus, not going out has become a habitual behaviour for some older people and not due to physical impairment; centralising the importance of behaviour to overcome social isolation and losses attributable to this.

Distress as a personal burden to bear

One older person described the way in which her friend coped with low mood as: “it was her cross and she would carry it” [Older Person 12]. This metaphor captures common experiences of older people with low mood or stress; as personal burdens for older people to bear. One older person described:

“I had six major operations within about three years. So that really knocked me off my pedestal and nobody really knows… That’s the thing. Depression. Nobody knows what you’re going through… you put on a smile and everybody thinks you’re fine, you’re doing alright, aren’t you? But they don’t realise inside that you’ve been through hell and back and you’re suffering.” [Older Person 10].

The invisibility of such distress, as described, implies an opportunity to control the perceptions of others. A reluctance to share mental health experiences with others was apparent:

“You don't really want to pick up the phone and talk to friends because if you're miserable I'm not going to make her miserable, you know. You've got to do something for yourself.” [Older Person 5].

The reluctance stems from not wanting to burden other people; to share their misery. Some older people did describe sharing these apparent burdens with their General Practitioners (GPs) in order to obtain support; anti-depressant usage was common among participants. However, the problems remained unresolved.

Workers acknowledged how older people did not want to talk about mental health problems, such as anxiety, with them:

“Somehow anxiety has got a capital A, they might talk about feeling a bit low or something, so I think people don’t always find it easy to identify.” [Worker 5].

Older men were commonly identified as a group reluctant to discuss mental health. However, workers described being able to overcome reluctance to talk and perceived stigma about mental health by providing time and developing trust:

“…people do, once they trust you, feel that they can confide and so people have talked about issues around mental health and you listen… quite often it has been enough just to listen but sometimes we would encourage people to have a chat with the GP or maybe direct them towards some counselling.” [Worker 5].

The opportunity to establish meaningful, quality relationships and develop listening skills is important and facilitates encouragement to disclosure to healthcare systems services.

Having courage and providing/receiving encouragement

Older people described themselves as having to build up courage and determination to participate in group activities despite feelings of low mood and/or stress. One participant described actualising their sense of courage, referring to the time they discovered an advert for a group activity:

“I thought, ‘That sounds good’ but, of course, I hadn’t got the courage because, as I said, [my husband had] only been gone three or four months. Well, I thought, I’ll cut the thing off the [newspaper], which I did, and I popped it into this thing in the kitchen. I had to take it out from time to time and look at it. It took me six months to find the courage to, to phone up.” [Older Person 1].

Courage was important as part of accepting the need to reach out and make social contact. One participant described requiring “grim determination” [Older Person 5]; perhaps indicating how difficult it was to find the necessary courage to engage in a new social activity.

To sustain behaviour change and participation in group activities older people indicated a fear of slipping backwards; sustaining courage and motivation can be challenging as one participant describes:

“…once you drop something it’s so difficult to pick up again afterwards. You think ‘oh, I haven’t been for a long while; what will they think of me if I turn up now?’ you know. But it takes a lot of willpower and not everybody’s got that willpower.” [Older Person 10].

In counter-point to the courage that older people described, workers identified the importance of providing encouragement. Workers expressed empathy towards older people seeking to initiate new social activities, as the following worker describes:

“They need that encouragement to go to the befriending group. I do make contact with everybody a week before to remind them to see ‘do you need a taxi?’, ‘do you need a lift?’” [Worker 4].

The provision of encouragement may act to support older people’s own sense of courage to overcome challenges of low-confidence. Encouragement was reported to be consistently required and reinforced to support joining in.

Self-worth and the value of group activities

Participation in group activities was valued for several reasons: as an opportunity to develop social relationships, participate in activities and roles, maintain a routine, and also to experience a change of environment. One participant described attending an exercise class as an opportunity for respite from being a caregiver for her husband:

“I don’t work, but this is my day off where I come and enjoy the exercising. I enjoy being with the people… I love my husband, don’t get me wrong, but it’s just nice. He’s in, I can have the car, I can come down here, and it’s just a release sometimes, just to switch off and everything.” [Older Person 16].

Participating in group activities also supported a sense of self-worth within the group, as one participant described: “I really enjoy it and I’m the tea lady” [Older Person 15]. It was clear that participation could also include assuming roles within these groups; others also described providing supportive roles for newcomers.

Workers acknowledged the importance and range of benefits that participating in group activities had for older people. One worker described an exercise group in the following way:

“It isn’t just about sticking the music on and moving your arms and legs, it’s about the interaction with you and the folks in the group and the interaction between each [participant]… just going once a week, say to an exercise group when they have maybe suffered from depression for 2 years and have never been out of the house maybe following a bereavement, it’s more than a lifeline.” [Worker 5].

Acknowledging the role of group activities, beyond the activity itself, is important and has implications for older people to maintain participation, self-confidence and social relationships.

Workers identified that group settings were not appropriate for everyone:

“Even though some of them are still fairly mobile that lack of confidence, I think, of being in a group situation has put them off trying.” [Worker 4].

Providing support and encouragement is important to addressing inertia by overcoming apprehension and lack of confidence regarding group activities.

Barriers, tensions and gaps in service provision

Internal (intra-personal) and external (inter-personal and systemic) barriers were identified from the experiences of older people. Lack of acceptance and difficulties in acknowledging need (i.e. mental health arising from social isolation or loss of meaningful activities) among older people presented a barrier to engagement with the third sector services; this was evidenced in the continuation of avoidance-style behaviours and social withdrawal. One older person described how she coped with her low mood: “if I feel a bit low, I put the television on” [Older Person 12]. Another shared her views about her friend whom she describes as experiencing low mood:

“She has no hobbies, no interests at all… But she still gets very low and, to my mind, almost enjoys it. That sounds odd, I suppose, but it’s become a way of life and she doesn’t mind saying so.” [Older Person 17].

A lack of opportunities to engage in activities may perpetuate this cycle of social withdrawal; for some of the older person participants, suitable opportunities were considered to be lacking, providing further disincentive.

Transport was identified as a barrier to participation in group activities. Some older people in the study were still able to drive and use their own transport to access these groups; others could no longer drive and described public transport as either unsuitable, or non-existent: “There is no community transport here at all.” [Older Person 9]. Workers acknowledged transport as an issue in the provision of services:

“This is a problem that we have. We know that there are people that are stuck at home… but it's just getting them out and transport is always an issue.” [Worker 3].

Although some workers provided transport to older people, using their own vehicle, the capacity to maintain this raised concerns:

“In the past I might have taken people – picked people up a bit more but we just haven’t got the capacity to do that.” [Worker 6].

Financial cuts to services were described by older people and also workers; this was typically attributed to the policy of fiscal austerity and remained an ongoing concern. Workers would often talk to service users during group activities about financial cuts and service losses, as one older person describes:

“[She’s] always saying they’re cutting back on the company where she works for Age UK, you know. It’s such a shame because a lot of people need these groups.” [Older Person 16].

Where services had been cut, gaps in provision had not been filled and so the needs of those older people who had utilised these services went unmet.

Workers described tensions around the boundaries of their roles as facilitators of group activities (in a paid or voluntary capacity) and responsibility for older people experiencing mental health problems. Workers identified a lack of mental health training:

“We kind of work maybe - try and instinctively to chat to people and reassure them. We don't really know if that’s making much of a difference.” [Worker 6].

Workers had concerns about managing boundaries with older people who presented severe mental health needs:

“You would need to have… good boundaries I think when you’re working with people… so you don't get drawn in to all sorts of things that are going on with that person’s life.” [Worker 6].

This concern was shared by others and reflected a lack of sufficient, tailored training. Workers also identified a tension in the lack of collaboration between third sector and primary care services; important in the context of clients with apparent mental health needs (e.g. older people with dementia, self-harm).

Conceptual model

The conceptual model is derived from the thematic analysis of the interview data. The experience of loss, as a contributing factor to the mental health needs of older people, is central to the model. How older people respond to this loss varies and is individualised, with courage required in order to accept that a problem exists and to do something about it. Not moving on and not acknowledging a need (i.e. psycho-social needs arising from social isolation or loss of meaningful activities) may then lead to inactivity and increasing social withdrawal. It is this population who are at risk of falling through the cracks of support offered by third sector services.

Views about the proposed NOTEPAD feasibility study

Overall, older people and third sector workers in this study were positive about the potential for an intervention to be delivered by third sector workers as part of the NOTEPAD study. However, participants reported mixed feelings about whether older people with low mood or stress would take part in the study, specifically group activities:

“If you’ve got a person who wants to sit in the house and not do anything and is not willing to do anything, nothing on this earth will get you out of it.” [Older Person 3].

Older people in the study did not typically associate Age UK North Staffordshire with providing mental health services; this was confirmed by the Age UK North Staffordshire worker interviews. Workers identified training needs, supervision and having the opportunity to de-brief as important in the development of the intervention for the NOTEPAD study:

“You need access to a supervisor and I think depending on when you were having contact with the individuals concerned you would need to be able to de-brief. If you had an urgent concern, you would need to be able to de-brief straight after… you probably also need to be writing something down.” [Worker 5].

Documenting interventions and actions seemed important. About the design of the intervention, the inclusion of one-to-one and group activities was identified as important. Group activities were not seen as suitable for everybody, and one-to-one interventions were considered essential in order to provide opportunity to develop trusting relationships. Furthermore, having a worker accompany an older person to new group settings was considered crucial to providing support and much needed encouragement. Qualitative data that informed study design are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Qualitative data informing proposed study design

Discussion

The themes presented in the results map out how experiences of loss contributed to the mental health of older people in a community sample, their engagement with third sector services, and the provision of these services by those involved in delivery. The process is depicted in the conceptual model (Fig. 1). The experience of loss was described in multiple forms and was a central theme from the interviews. It is clear that loss and its ramifications for older people is a complex and individualised experience; responses to loss, although supported by third sector services, are influenced by biographical factors (e.g. existing support networks, sense of one’s own courage, personal agency). Older people described a reluctance to talk about mental health problems with friends, for fear of burdening them and also experiencing difficulty acknowledging the need to do so; those who self-identified as experiencing low mood or stress would talk to third sector workers once a trusting relationship had been developed. Older people in this study were actively participating in group activities in order to maintain social networks and roles which supported good mental health; older people valued being members of these groups because of the opportunity for social interaction and to support self-confidence. The role of courage and to receive (or provide) encouragement was highlighted as important in supporting this participation; highlighting a key function of third sector workers. Older people revealed an ongoing concern with slipping back to avoidance behaviours; this suggests that maintaining positive behaviours requires ongoing support and encouragement. The findings highlighted important areas for development of the intervention for the NOTEPAD feasibility study and informed: facilitating relationships and trust, facilitating self-management, maintaining participant engagement, and supporting third sector workers.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Older people’s and third sector service responses to distress and loss in later life

The data supports other research that identifies the need to take a broader perspective on mental health and its management than the biomedical model permits. For instance, Burroughs et al. [20] described how GPs normalised and justified depression among older people as a social problem reinforced by GP’s sense of powerlessness to respond as they perceived that there were very limited options available to them. In the study reported here, older people identified feelings of distress as a personal burden. Many disclosed anti-depressant usage yet problems remained unresolved and older people in this study took it upon themselves to identify opportunities to attend group activities, which supported their social mental health. Maintaining participation in activities and social interaction seemed important for older people in this study to support quality of life and mental health as identified in other research [21,22,23,24,25] but also to support coping with, and moving on from, the experience of loss. The process of ‘moving on’ has been identified previously in relation to depression [37] in which the role of others (i.e. case managers) was important in providing encouragement. Community-based activities provided by third sector organisations seemed to provide psycho-social benefits for older people in this study, as has been identified elsewhere [21, 27,28,29,30, 38, 39]. Chew-Graham et al. [39] described perceived stigma as preventing older people from sharing mental health problems with their GP; this may relate to the fear of burdening others that has been described. In this study an apparent link between loss (in multiple forms) and anxiety and depression was identified; thus, third sector workers may be well placed, with greater contact time, to develop relationships, support disclosure and respond to mental health risk factors. Targeting loss, supporting responses of older people to loss, and overcoming avoidance type behaviours that may lead to rumination, may be a useful point of entry for third sector services.

Strengths and limitations

This study explored multiple perspectives on anxiety and depression among older people in the community, and identified the central role of loss that contributes to such mental health problems. Interviews were conducted with older people who were already accessing group activities and services in their local community. We did not specifically recruit participants who experienced low mood or stress.

The views from potentially house-bound individuals were limited to those shared by participants about others whom they knew as potentially house-bound. These views may have been shared as a means of supporting social comparisons. This limitation occurred despite efforts from the researchers to recruit more broadly. A male perspective was lacking; this may have been as a consequence of the recruitment strategy which focused on group activities, which were attended in the majority by women. More broadly, this reflects a lack of male-oriented activity groups available in the community.

Conclusions

This study has identified the central role of loss in later life as potentially contributing to mental health problems; the findings have important implications for the proposed feasibility study, training of the third sector workers delivering the intervention and clinical practice. Third sector workers reported already regular contact with older people presenting apparent mental health problems and needs in the community; typically, such contact occurred at group activities and services not designed to respond to mental health needs, nor with staff or volunteers appropriately trained. With appropriate training third sector workers may be well-placed to deliver a low-level psycho-social intervention to older people, as recommended in the stepped-care approach in NICE guidelines for anxiety and depression, and would provide both older people and primary care with choice for management.

Abbreviations

LTC:

Long Term Conditions

NICE:

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

NOTEPAD:

NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression study

PPIE:

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagements

References

  1. Health Survey for England (2005). The health of older people: summary of key findings. Health survey for England: the information centre. Accessed online: http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB01184/heal-surv-heal-old-peo-eng-2005-rep-v5.pdf.

  2. Djernes JK. Prevalence and predictors of depression in populations of elderly: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;113(5):372–87. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00770.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant C, Jackson H, Ames D. The prevalence of anxiety in older adults: methodological issues and a review of the literature. J Affect Disord. 2008;109(3):233–50. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steffens D, Fisher G, Langa K, Potter G, Plassman B. Prevalence of depression among older Americans: the aging demographics and memory study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(5):879–88. doi:10.1017/S1041610209990044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodda J, Walker Z, Carter J. Depression in older adults. BMJ. 2011;343:d5219. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vink D, Aartsen MJ, Schoevers RA. Risk factors for anxiety and depression in the elderly: a review. J Affect Disord. 2008;106(1):29–44. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic disease and decrements in health. Results from the world health surveys. Lancet. 2007;370:851–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang MWB, Ho RCM, Cheung MWL, Fu E, Mak A. Prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33:217–23. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.03.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Health (DoH) (2012). Long Term Conditions Compendium of Information: third edition. Department of health publications. Available online: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216528/dh_134486.pdf.

  10. Chew-Graham, C.A., Burns, A. and Baldwin, R.C. (2004). Treating depression in later life: we need to implement the evidence that exists. [Invited Editorial] BMJ, 329: 181-182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7459.181.

  11. Coventry P, Hays R, Dickens C, Bundy C, Garrett C, Cherrington A, Chew-Graham CA. Talking about depression: barriers to managing depression in people with long term conditions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(10) doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-10.

  12. Blazer DG. Depression in late life: review and commentary. Focus. 2009;7(1):118–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laidlaw K, Pachana N. Ageing, mental health and demographic change: challenges for psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2009;40(6):601–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moffat K, Mercer SW. Challenges of managing people with multimorbidity in today’s healthcare systems. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):129. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0344-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallo JJ, Morales KH, Bogner H, Raue PJ, Zee J, Bruce M, Reynolds C. Long term effects of depression care management on mortality in older adults: follow-up of a cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care. BMJ. 2013;346:f2570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2009). NICE clinical guideline 90. Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults. Accessed online: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/Depression_Update_FULL_GUIDELINE.pdf.

  17. National Institute Clinical Care and Excellence (NICE) (2011). Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in adults: management in primary, secondary and community care. Accessed online: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG113.

  18. Kakuma R, Minas H, Van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, Saxena S, Scheffler RM. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654–63. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61093-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Siriwardhana C, Adikari A, Van Bortel T, McCrone P, Sumathipala A. An intervention to improve mental health care for conflict-affected forced migrants in low-resource primary care settings: a WHO MhGAP-based pilot study in Sri Lanka (COM-GAP study). Trials. 2013;14(1):423. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Burroughs H, Lovell K, Morley M, Baldwin R, Burns A, Chew-Graham CA. ‘justifiable depression’: how primary care professionals and patients view late-life depression? A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;23(3):369–77. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Connell J, Brazier J, O’Cathain A, Lloyd-Jones M, Paisley S. Quality of life of people with mental health problems: a synthesis of qualitative research. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10(1):138. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Concern A. Promoting mental health and well-being in later life. London: Mental Health Foundation and Age Concern; 2006. Retrieved from: https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/promoting_mh_wb_later_life.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernard M, Bartlam B, Sim J, Biggs S. Housing and care for older people: life in an English purpose-built retirement village. Ageing & Society. 2007;27:555–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(15):5797–801. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219686110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Isherwood LM, King DS, Luszcz MA. Widowhood in the fourth age: support exchange, relationships and social participation. Ageing Soc. 2017;37(1):188–212. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Donnelly EA, Hinterlong JE. Changes in social participation and volunteer activity among recently widowed older adults. The Gerontologist. 2010;50(2):158–69. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Forsman AK, Schierenbeck I, Wahlbeck K. Psychosocial interventions for the prevention of depression in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Aging & Health. 2011;23(3):387–416. http://doi.org/10.1177/0898264310378041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Greaves CJ, Farbus L. Effects of creative and social activity on the health and well-being of socially isolated older people: outcomes from a multi-method observational study. J R Soc Promot Health. 2006;126(3):134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Staricoff RL. Arts in health: the value of evaluation. J R Soc Promot Health. 2006;126:116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson V, Stanley J. Capturing the contribution of community arts to health and well-being. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2007;9:28–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2007.9721836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hutchinson SL, Yarnal CM, Staffordson J, Kerstetter DL. Beyond fun and friendship: the red hat society as a coping resource for older women. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(7):979–99. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X08007058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brittain K, Kingston A, Davies K, Collerton J, Robinson LA, Kirkwood TBL, Bond J, Jagger C. An investigation into the patterns of loneliness and loss in the oldest old – Newcastle 85+ study. Ageing Soc. 2017;37(1):39–62. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. NOTEPAD Study: https://www.keele.ac.uk/pchs/research/mentalhealth/notepad/. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.

  34. Morgan D. The SAGE Encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods. CA: SAGE; 2008. p. 816–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Henwood K, Pigeon N. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol. 1992;83:97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Overend K, Bosanquet K, Bailey D, Foster D, Gascoyne S, Lewis H, Nutbrown S, Woodhouse R, Gilbody S, Chew-Graham C. Revealing hidden depression in older people: a qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):142. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0362-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gask L, Bower P, Lamb J, Burroughs H, Chew-Graham CA, Edwards S, Hibbert D, Kovandžić M, Lovell K, Rogers A, Waheed W, Dowrick S, AMP Research Group. Improving access to psychosocial interventions for common mental health problems in the United Kingdom: narrative review and development of a conceptual model for complex interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):249. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chew-Graham CA, Kovandžić M, Gask L, Burroughs H, Clarke P, Sanderson H, Dowrick C. Why may older people with depression not present to primary care? Messages from secondary analysis of qualitative data. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2012;20(1):52–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01015.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study team wish to acknowledge the participants who gave up their time to take part in interviews. We also acknowledge Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University for overseeing the coordination of this research and the Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement team at Keele University for their support and expertise. The study team also acknowledge the work of Elizabeth Clarke, Mavra Mirza and Maatla Tshimologo, third year medical students at Keele University Medical School, for their contribution to data analysis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

The NOTEPAD study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research’s Health Services & Delivery Research (HS&DR) Programme ref.: 13/54/34. This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors (HB, TK, BB, MR, PB, TS, JP, CCG) contributed to the conception and design of the NOTEPAD study. HB and TK conducted data collection. HB, TK, BB, MR and CCG conducted data analysis and interpretation. TS participated in the coordination of the study. TK wrote the first draft of the manuscript; all authors contributed to revising the manuscript critically and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Kingstone.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Keele University Ethical Review Panel on 23rd September 2015. All participants provided consent for their anonymised data to be used in the publication and dissemination of findings.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Age UK North Staffordshire, a service provider to older people, is a research partner with Keele University in the NOTEPAD study. Carolyn Chew-Graham is Section Editor for BMC Family Practice.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kingstone, T., Burroughs, H., Bartlam, B. et al. Developing a community-based psycho-social intervention with older people and third sector workers for anxiety and depression: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 18, 77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0648-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0648-7

Keywords