Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the approaches of proactive PCPs versus non-proactive PCPs in lifestyle treatment/drug treatment / surgical intervention

From: Attitudes and knowledge about weight management among primary care physicians in Israel: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Highly proactive PCPs

(n = 67)

Less proactive PCPs

(n = 78)

P-value

Q2. To which extent do you agree with the following statements?

Lifestyle modification is effective in reducing weight

(agree/strongly agree)

56 (81.2%)

63 (82.9%)

0.786

Pharmacological treatment is effective in reducing weight

(agree/strongly agree)

62 (81.6%)

37 (53.6%)

< 0.001

Surgical treatment is effective in reducing weight

(agree/strongly agree)

54 (71.1%)

42 (60.9%)

0.195

Obesity medication has a high rate of side effects

(agree/strongly agree)

20 (26.6%)

16 (23.6)

0.298

Surgical treatment of obesity has significant complications

(agree/strongly agree)

12 (15.8%)

6 (8.8%)

0.360

Q7. If you do not tend to offer pharmaceutical treatment to patients, what are the reasons for it?

lack of knowledge

4 (5.3%)

23 (33.3%)

< 0.001

do not know the indication

4 (5.3%)

5 (7.2%)

0.621

 

10 (13.2%)

10 (14.5%)

0.816

expensive

11 (14.5%)

12 (17.4%)

0.631

Do not believe in this treatment

8 (10.5%)

11 (15.9%)

0.334

Concern about the side effects

11 (14.5%)

11 (15.9%)

0.806

Unresponsiveness of the patient

13 (17.1%)

9 (13%)

0.496

Q8. How often do you offer these treatments to your patients? (Always or often vs. rarely or almost never)

lifestyle modification

75 (100%)

67 (98.5%)

0.292

pharmacological treatment

49 (65.3%)

19 (28.4%)

< 0.001

surgical treatment

10 (13.7%)

2 (3%)

0.024