Skip to main content

Table 5 Adjusted odds ratios for the relationships between the independent variables, team processes, and outcomes of care

From: Patient and family views of team functioning in primary healthcare teams with nurse practitioners: a survey of patient-reported experience and outcomes

Variables

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Coefficient

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

p value

Coefficient

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

p value

Coefficient

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

p value

Team processes (PREM)

Low

Reference

.

.

.

.

.

Reference

.

.

High

.

.

.

.

.

.

2.70

14.92 (8.11–27.44)

 < 0.0001

Role clarity

Low

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

High

2.40

11.07 (4.45–27.55)

 < 0.0001

1.98

7.24 (3.52–14.89)

 < 0.0001

1.11

3.02 (1.36–6.73)

0.007

Respondent

Family

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Patient

-0.53

0.59 (0.37–0.95)

0.029

0.14

1.15 (0.67–1.95)

0.615

0.59

1.81 (1.02–3.22)

0.043

Sex

Male

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Female

0.36

1.43 (0.88–2.31)

0.145

0.52

1.68 (1.03–2.75)

0.040

0.47

1.60 (0.89–2.88)

0.114

Perceived income

Inadequate

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Adequate

0.64

1.90 (1.06–3.42)

0.032

0.48

1.62 (0.90–2.91)

0.109

-0.05

0.95 (0.45–2.01)

0.891

Location

Non urban

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Urban

-0.49

0.62 (0.40–0.95)

0.029

0.35

1.42 (0.90–2.26)

0.134

0.82

2.27 (1.31–3.95)

0.004

Employment status

Not employed

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Employed

-0.44

0.64 (0.40–1.03)

0.064

0.13

1.14 (0.69–1.89)

0.613

0.65

1.92 (1.10–3.36)

0.021

Routine health visit

No

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Reference

.

.

Yes

0.41

1.50 (0.68–3.31

0.312

1.32

3.75 (1.73–8.14)

0.001

1.59

4.90 (1.96–12.22)

0.001

  1. aModel 1: Dependent variable: Team processes. Independent variables: Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
  2. Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 3.373; ddl = 7; p value 0.848. Backward stepwise likelihood
  3. bModel 2: Dependent variable: Outcomes of care. Independent variables: Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
  4. Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 0.018; ddl = 2; p value 0.991. Backward stepwise likelihood
  5. cModel 3: Full model Dependent variable: Outcomes of care. Independent variables: Team processes, Role clarity, Team size, Respondent, Perceived income, Location, Practice setting, Employment status, Marital status, Sex, Length of follow-up, Routine health visit and Country of birth
  6. Hosmer–Lemeshow: Khi2 = 8.632; ddl = 8; p value 0.374. Backward stepwise likelihood
  7. PREM Patient-reported experience measure, PROM patient-reported outcome measure