Skip to main content

Table 3 Bias assessment of engagement outcome measures (first) and clinical/drinking outcome measures (second)

From: Evidence based models of care for the treatment of alcohol use disorder in primary health care settings: a systematic review

Reference

Domain 1; bias arising from the randomization process

Domain 1b; bias arising from the randomization process (cluster-randomized trials)

Domain 2; bias due to deviations from the intended intervention (assignment to intervention)

Domain 2; bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (adhering to intervention)

Domain 3; bias due to missing outcome data

Domain 4; bias in measurement of the outcome

Domain 5; bias in selection of the reported results

Overall risk of bias judgement

Bradley et al., 2018

Low risk

Low risk

NA

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Coulton et al., 2017 [23]

NA

Low risk

NA

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

NA

Some risk

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

Drummond et al., 2009 [22]

NA

Low risk

NA

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

NA

High risk

NA

Some risk

NA

Some risk

NA

High risk

Ettner et al., 2014 [20]

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Low risk

Low risk

NA

NA

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Moore et al., 2010 [19]

NA

Low risk

NA

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

NA

Low risk

NA

Some risk

NA

Some risk

NA

Some risk

Oslin et al., 2013 [24]

Low risk

Low risk

NA

Some risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

High risk

High risk

Saitz et al., 2013 [28]

Low risk

Low risk

NA

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Watkins et al., 2017 [25]

Low risk

Low risk

NA

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Low risk

Some risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Willenbring et al., 1999 [29]

Low risk

Low risk

NA

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

High risk

High risk

Wallhed finn et al., 2018 [21]

Low risk

Low risk

NA

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Upshur et al., 2015 [26]

Low risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

Some risk

NA

NA

Some risk

Low risk

Some risk

Low risk

Some risk

Some risk

High risk

High risk