Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of rehabilitation versus standard treatment on sick leave conclusion

From: Effects of a vocational rehabilitation programme on return to work among sick-listed primary health care patients: a population-based matched, case-control study

 

Conditional proportional hazards regression analysis

Follow-up, days

n

Exposure

Parameter estimate (SD)

Wald’s χ2

HR*

95% CI

p

1–14

151

Intervention vs control

−1.15 (0.24)

23.7

0.32

0.20–0.51

<  0.0001

15–112

196

Intervention vs control

−0.75 (0.15)

23.6

0.47

0.35–0.64

<  0.0001

113–365

85

Intervention vs control

−0.35 (0.22)

2.6

0.70

0.46–1.08

0.10

366–1096

78

Intervention vs control

0.15 (0.27)

0.30

1.16

0.69–1.96

0.58

Total follow up

510

Intervention vs control

−0.60 (0.10)

38.3

0.55

0.45–0.66

< 0.0001

  1. *Hazards ratio. Adjusted for triplet matching number (conditional analysis) and for remaining propensity score differences