Recruitment and reach in a pragmatic behavioral weight loss randomized controlled trial: implications for real-world primary care practice

Table 1 Percent of patients from different recruitment sources, among patients who contacted the study (n = 2479)

	In-clinic individual intervention (FFS) 12 clinics	In-clinic group intervention (PCMH) 12 clinics	Phone group intervention (DM) 12 clinics		Total 36 clinics
	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	p	Mean (SD)
Mailings	65.8% (27.8)	67.6% (11.7)	64.7% (18.9)	0.94	66.1% (20.0)
In clinic referral	26.6% (26.7)	21.1% (10.3)	17.0% (10.0)	0.41	21.5% (17.4)
Other sources	6.4% (5.1)	8.9% (8.2)	17.7% (14.5)	0.02	11.0% (10.9)

Data are reported as means at the clinic level. Thirty-three contacts missing recruitment source

ISSN: 2731-4553