Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinics and respondents recruited for the study

From: Experiences of accreditation impact in general practice – a qualitative study among general practitioners and their staff

Clinic

Type of clinic

GPs and staff in the clinic

Respondents at the first interview

Respondents at the second interview

A priori attitude to accreditation (GPs)

1

Partnership

3 GPs, 1 nurse, 2 secretaries

2 GPs, 1 nurse, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 nurse, 1 secretary

Negative

2

Solo

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

Positive

3

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 3 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 1 secretary

Negative

4

Solo

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

Positive

5

Solo

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

N.A.

6

Partnership

3 GPs, 3 nurses, 1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 1 secretary

Positive

7

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP

1 GP

Negative

8

Partnership

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

Negative

9a

Partnership

2 GPs, 1 secretary

2 GPs

Positive

10

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Negative

11

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Positive

12

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses, 2 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses

3 GPs, 2 nurses

Negativeb

Positiveb

  1. aThe clinic was excluded from the study due to postponement of survey visit
  2. bTwo different GPs had answered the questionnaire