Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics comparing 2011 and 2014 independently

From: Novel oral anticoagulants in primary care in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional comparison before and after their introduction

 

GROUP A (2011)

GROUP B (2014)

p-value

patients (n)

total

804

755

 

gender (%)

male

374 (46.5%)

388 (51.4%)

.06a

female

429 (53.4%)

367 (48.6%)

undetermined

1 (0.1%)

0

 

age (years)

Median (IQR)

79 (71–86)

77 (70–83)

<.01b

Min – Max

19–99

18–103

< 65

92 (11.4%)

118 (15.6%)

65–74

179 (22.3%)

170 (22.5%)

≥75

533 (66.3%)

467 (61.9%)

additional diagnosis

at least 1 additional

750 (93.3%)

724 (95.9%)

.02a

renal insufficiency

54 (6.7%)

55 (7.3%)

.66a

coagulopathy

13 (1.6%)

17 (2.3%)

.36a

intracranial bleeding

8 (1.0%)

6 (0.8%)

.68a

epistaxis

7 (0.9%)

10 (1.3%)

.39a

gastrointestinal bleeding

15 (1.9%)

12 (1.6%)

.68a

stroke

43 (5.3%)

34 (4.5%)

.44a

CHA2DS2-VASC:

0

48 (6.0%)

56 (7.4%)

.34a

1

54 (6.7%)

59 (7.8%)

≥2

702 (87.3%)

640 (84.8%)

prescriptions (per year)

patients with at least 1 prescription

684 (85.1%)

677 (89.7%)

<.01a

Md (IQR)

12 (5–25)

15 (6–24)

.31b

Min - Max

1–123

1–123

all patients

  

.02b

Md (IQR)

10 (2–22.8)

13 (3–23)

Min - Max

0–123

0–123

OAC

VKA or NOAC

186 (23.1%)

323 (42.8%)

<.01a

VKA

182 (22.6%)

188 (24.9%)

.29a

Rivaroxaban

0 (0.0%)

121 (16.0%)

<.01a

Dabigatran

5 (0.6%)

14 (1.9%)

.03a

Apixaban

0 (0.0%)

10 (1.3%)

<.01c

ASA (without additional OAC)d

123 (15.3%)

62 (8.2%)

<.01a

consultation of cardiologist

125 (15.5%)

165 (21.9%)

<.01a

  1. CONTENT-Patients with diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, which were registered only once, either in 2011 (group A) or in 2014 (group B). OAC oral anticoagulation, VKA vitamin-k antagonists, NOAC novel oral anticoagulation, ASA Acetylsalicylic acid
  2. aChi2-test, bMann-Whitney-U-test, cFisher’s exact test
  3. dIndication for ASA (100 mg), such as peripheral vascular disease or post-stroke or post-myocardial infarction or else and either as primary or secondary prophylaxis, could not clearly be stated