From: Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: a review of the literature
Design | Intervention | Country | Focus | Sample | Sample size (n) | Duration | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster blind RCT | Electronic decision support system | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 639 | 21 months | [15] |
Cluster RCT | Diabetes register | UK | GP | T2D | 3, 608 | 15 months | [16] |
Cluster RCT | Diabetes register | USA | GP | T2D | 7, 101 | 12 months | [17] |
Cluster RCT | Electronic telemedicine | USA | Patient | T2D | 1, 665 | 12 months | [18] |
Cluster RCT | Electronic telemedicine | USA | GP | T2D | 1, 665 | 12 months | [19] |
Cluster RCT | Electronic self-management system | USA | Patient | T2D | 886 | 12 months | [20] |
RCT | Electronic self-management system | USA | Patient | T1D, T2D | 122 | 6 months | [21] |
RCT | Electronic self-management system | USA | Patient | T1D, T2D | 104 | 12 months | [22] |
RCT | Electronic self-management system | USA | Patient | T1D, T2D | 62 | 6 months | [23] |
Nonrandomised cluster control trial | Electronic management system | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 6, 646 | 24 months | [24] |
Nonrandomised control trial | Diabetes register | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 898 | 20 months | [25] |
Nonrandomised control trial | Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) based electronic management system | USA | GP | T2D | 173 | 16 months | [26] |
Nonrandomised control trial | Diabetes register | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 661 | 2 years | [27] |
Nonrandomised control trial | Electronic decision support system | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 16 | 6 months | [28] |
Single sample before and after design | Diabetes register | USA | GP | T1D, T2D | 62 | 3 years | [29] |
Single sample before and after design | Diabetes register | Korea | GP | T1D, T2D | 185 | 3 months | [30] |