Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of antibiotic prescribing outcomes in intervention and control clinics for main infections combineda

From: A pragmatic randomized trial of a primary care antimicrobial stewardship intervention in Ontario, Canada

Arm

N

Crude Rate

Unadjusted GEE Estimate

Adjusted GEE Estimatec

OR (95% CIb)

P

OR (95% CI)

p

Total Antibiotic Prescriptions

Control

763

325 (42.6%)

    

Intervention

609

297 (48.8%)

1.72 (1, 2.98)

0.05

0.78 (0.64, 0.96)

0.02

Delayed Antibiotic Prescriptions

Control

324d

38 (11.7%)

    

Intervention

294

65 (22.1%)

1.13 (0.47, 2.68)

0.79

2.29 (1.37, 3.83)

<0.01

Prescription Duration Longer than 7 Dayse

Control

273

80 (29.3%)

    

Intervention

258

55 (21.3%)

0.34 (0.12, 1.01)

0.05

0.24 (0.13, 0.43)

<0.0001

First Line Antibiotic Choicef

Control

232

197 (84.9%)

    

Intervention

258

238 (92.2%)

2.2 (2.02, 2.4)

<0.0001

1.41 (0.66, 3.01)

0.37

  1. aURI, sore throat, acute sinusitis, acute bronchitis, acute cystitisb 95% confidence interval; cadjusted for case-mix of conditions, age, sex, afterhours visits, and baseline prescribing rate; d denominators differ from total prescriptions in some cases due to missing data; e sore throat cases excluded from analysis fexcluding URI and bronchitis where any antibiotic is considered inappropriate