Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinics and interviewees in the study

From: The survey visit as a key evaluative event in accreditation–a qualitative study of survey visit experiences among surveyors and general practice professionals

Clinic

Clinic type

GPs and staff

1. round interview participants

2. round interview participants

A priori attitude to accreditationb

Survey visit observed

1

Partnership

3 GPs, 1 nurse,

2 secretaries

2 GPs, 1 nurse,

1 secretary

1 GP, 1 nurse,

1 secretary

Negative

Yes

2

Solo

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

Positive

Yes

3

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

3 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

Negative

Yes

4

Solo

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

Positive

Yes

5

Solo

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

N.A

No

6

Partnership

3 GPs, 3 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

Positive

Yes

7

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP

1 GP

Negative

Yes

8

Partnership

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

Negative

Yes

9a

Partnership

2 GPs, 1 secretary

2 GPs

 

Positive

Yes

10

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Negative

Yes

11

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Positive

Yes

12

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

2 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses

3 GPs, 2 nurses

Negativec

Positive

Yes

  1. aSurvey visit postponed; clinic excluded from the study
  2. bBased on a survey conducted before the initiation of the programme
  3. cTwo different GPs had answered the questionnaire