Skip to main content

Table 5 Impact of the specialist respondent psychiatrist (SRP) function on service improvement

From: Deployment of the consultation-liaison model in adult and child-adolescent psychiatry and its impact on improving mental health treatment

Improvement:

Total (n = 126)

Adult psychiatry (n = 94)

Child-adolescent psychiatry (n = 32)

P_value*

Of the followed activities:

Meana(SD)

Meana(SD)

Meana(SD)

Ability of general practitioners (GP) to establish a diagnosis

2.95 (0.87)

3.01 (0.88)

2.74 (0. 81)

0.15

Pharmacological treatment by GP

3.39 (0.86)

3.47 (0.82)

3.11 0(.93)

0.05

Prescribing and orientation toward counseling and psychotherapy for mental health disorders (MHD) by GP

3.25 (0.91)

3.34 (0.86)

2.96 (1.01)

0.06

Prescribing and orientation toward counseling and psychotherapy for substance-related disorders (SRD) by GP

2.97 (0.87)

3.03 (0.83)

2.76 (0.97)

0.16

In the ability of these services to evaluate a patient

 MH primary care teams (MH-PCT)

3.58 (0.98)

3.41 0.97)

4.04 (0.85)

0.00

 One-stop MH service teams

3.53 (0.82)

3.53 (0.80)

3.53 (0.90)

0.98

 Youth centers

3.74 (0.99)

4.50 (0.70)

3.65 (0.99)

0.26

In the quality of patient treatment by

 GP

0

3.25 (0.85)

3.26 (0.94)

0.95

 MH-PCT

3.52 (0.98)

3.35 (0.96)

3.93 (0.90)

0.01

In the quantity of patients treated by

 GP

2.97 (0.93)

3.01 (0.90)

2.85 (1.04)

0.43

 MH-PCT

3.09 (1.14)

2.96 (1.11)

3.44 (1.19)

0.07

In timeliness and effectiveness of patient treatment requested by

 One-stop MH service teams

3.41 (0.91)

3.38 (0.96)

3.50 (0.85)

0.64

 Youth centers

3.25 (1.15)

2.88 (1.45)

3.44 (0.96)

0.26

In coordination with MH primary care services

 GP

3.34 (1.08)

3.30 (1.08)

3.44 (1.12)

0.58

 MH-PCT

3.43 (1.08)

3.25 (1.01)

3.89 (1.15)

0.00

 One stop MH service teams

3.54 (0.97)

3.39 (0.99)

4.05 (0.70)

0.00

 Youth centers

3.46 (0.90)

3.13 (0.83)

3.61 (0.91)

0.21

In coordination with specialized MH services

 GP

3.34 (1.10)

3.30 (1.08)

3.44 (1.12)

0.58

 MH-PCT

3.65 (1.05)

3.44 (1.07)

4.18 (0.81)

0.00

 One stop MH service teams

3.72 (0.88)

3.59 (0.87)

4.16 (0.76)

0.01

 Youth centers

3.69 (1.05)

3.13 (1.12)

3.94 (0.93)

0.06

In the capacity to orient patients toward appropriate services

 GP

3.40 (1.00)

3.39 (0.98)

3.44 (1.08)

0.80

 MH-PCT

3.29 (1.04)

3.20 (1.00)

3.52 (1.12)

0.19

 One stop MH service teams

3.44 (0.99)

3.28 (1.02)

4.00 (0.66)

0.00

 Youth centers

3.58 (1.04)

3.50 (1.06)

3.61 (0.91)

0.78

In the capacity to orient patients toward appropriate services for SRD

 MH-PCT

3.43 (1.08)

3.25 (1.01)

3.89 (1.15)

0.01

 One stop MH service teams

3.40 (0.91)

3.39 (0.92)

3.41 (0.87)

0.94

 Youth centers

3.22 (0.99)

2.75 (0.70)

3.47 (1.06)

0.10

Overall impact of the SRP function

3.22 (0.85)

3.13 0(.81)

3.49 (0.91)

0.04

 Increase of MH services offered in the network

2.87 (1.21)

2.77 (1.18)

3.16 (1.27)

0.11

 Improvement in patient access to services

3.10 (1.07)

3.06 (1.09)

3.22 (1.03)

0.48

 Improvement in the adequacy of services for responding to patient needs

3.48 (1.03)

3.36 (1.03)

3.81 (0.96)

0.03

 Improvement in patient health and wellbeing

3.24 (0.96)

3.11 (0.95)

3.62 (0.90)

0.01

 Capacity of SRP to support joint follow-up of patient by primary care and specialized MH services

3.37 (1.02)

3.30 (0.93)

3.56 (1.24)

0.20

 Better integration and fluidity of services between primary care and specialized MH services

3.32 (0.94)

3.18 (1.10)

3.72 (.1.14)

0.02

  1. a: 5-point scale:1 = No impact; 2 = Weak impact; 3 = Average impact; 4 = High impact; 5 = Very high impact
  2. *ANOVA t-test