| Total (n = 126) | Adult psychiatry (n = 94) | Child-adolescent psychiatry (n = 32) | P_value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD)a | Mean (SD)a | Mean (SD)a | ||
a) Comfort and motivation related to the SRP function: | 3.70 (0.52) | 3.64 (0.52) | 3.86 (0.49) | 0.04 |
 Level of confidence in SRP capacity to support primary care | 3.96 (0.73) | 3.90 (0.67) | 4.13 (0.87) | 0.14 |
 Level of motivation for the function | 3.84 (0.83) | 3.78 (0.85) | 4.03 (0.74) | 0.13 |
 Level of complexity regarding interventions to which SRP respond | 3.30 (0.58) | 3.26 (0.58) | 3.44 (0.56) | 0.12 |
Satisfaction with the SRP role | ||||
 b) In relation to the function of SRP: | 3.79 (0.65) | 3.72 (0.62) | 4.00 (0.71) | 0.04 |
  Clarity of the role/mandate of SRP | 3.83 (0.87) | 3.72 (0.86) | 4.16 (0.84) | 0.01 |
  Clarity of civil responsibility related to SRP function | 3.44 (1.07) | 3.31 (1.05) | 3.81 (1.06) | 0.02 |
  Number of hours allocated for adequately carrying out SRP mandate | 3.67 (0.96) | 3.63 (0.96) | 3.81 (0.96) | 0.35 |
  Margin of maneuver for accomplishing SRP work adequately | 3.62 (1.01) | 3.49 (1.03) | 4.00 (0.84) | 0.01 |
  Degree of influence in choice of appropriate therapeutic interventions – re: cases discussed | 4.01 (0.88) | 4.01 (0.87) | 4.00 (0.91) | 0.95 |
  Degree of influence in decision-making regarding patient orientation – re: cases discussed | 4.17 (0.82) | 4.16 (0.79) | 4.22 (0.90) | 0.72 |
 c) In relation to support obtained for the SRP function in their organization: | 2.76 (0.78) | 2.72 (0.79) | 2.88 (0.74) | 0.34 |
  Administrative and logistical support provided by the organization | 2.90 (1.22) | 2.73 (1.20) | 3.38 (1.15) | 0.01 |
  Support for training activities on the SRP function | 2.45 (1.00) | 2.39 (1.07) | 2.59 (0.79) | 0.33 |
  Feedback on the SRP role aimed at improving SRP functioning and effectiveness | 2.70 (1.23) | 2.70 (1.31) | 2.69 (0.96) | 0.95 |
  Optimal support for deployment of the SRP function by psychiatrists from their organization | 3.07 (1.01) | 3.09 (1.04) | 3.03 (0.94) | 0.79 |
  Opportunities for exchanges with other SRP | 3.10 (1.33) | 3.04 (1.33) | 3.28 (1.32) | 0.38 |
 d) In relation to collaboration with targeted clinicians: | ||||
  Adherence to the function with: | 3.63 (1.18) | 3.43 (1.58) | 3.86 (1.25) | 0.40 |
   General practitioners (GP) in family medicine groups | 3.34 (0.99) | 3.38 (0.96) | 3.20 (1.08) | 0.43 |
   Clinicians in mental health (MH) primary care teams (MH-PCT) | 3.77 (1.30) | 3.54 (1.41) | 4.37 (0.68) | 0.00 |
   Clinicians in one-stop MH service teams | 3.93 (1.13) | 3.82 (1.23) | 4.27 (0.63) | 0.10 |
   Clinicians in youth centers | 3.48 (1.31) | 3.00 (1.81) | 3.61 (1.14) | 0.36 |
  Pertinence of consultations/collaborations with: | 3.99 (0.97) | 3.96 (1.04) | 4.07 (0.91) | 0.70 |
   GP in family medicine groups | 3.65 (0.97) | 3.64 (0.93) | 3.68 (1.14) | 0.85 |
   Clinicians in MH-PCT | 4.04 (1.01) | 3.93 (1.08) | 4.33 (0.73) | 0.07 |
   Clinicians in MH one-stop service teams | 4.20 (0.79) | 4.19 (0.81) | 4.23 (0.75) | 0.85 |
   Clinicians in youth centers | 4.07 (1.14) | 4.11 (1.36) | 4.06 (1.05) | 0.90 |
Stability of professionals with whom SRP interacted (all those mentioned above) in the context of their function as SRP | 3.44 (1.09) | 3.41 (1.08) | 3.53 (1.16) | 0.60 |