Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the alpha-testing phase and 2nd steering group

From: Construction of a patient decision aid for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care

SUNDAE Check-list

Alpha-testing Results

Steering group

Participants (FG + II)

Physicians (II)

Changes made

Explicit description of the decision

✗ Reformulate the title in interrogative form

No need to specify the revocable nature of the decision and the possibility of re-consultation, which must be clarified orally by the doctor

 

Modified title

Polarized distribution of information according to the decision

Description of the health problem

✗ Need for a clearer definition of uUTI

✗ Diagram of bladder not very useful and difficult to identify

Validation of symptoms description

Improved definition of uUTI, addition of the term inflammation

Removed the bladder diagram

Information on options, their benefits, risks, and consequences

Overall positive to help in decision-making

Layout validation

✗ Improving the visibility of adverse events and their link to antibiotics

✗ Term “several weeks” not precise enough

Suitable information

Information on the risk of pyelonephritis is relevant because it is not well known

Interest of the precision on the absence of risk on fertility

✗ Provide information on alternative treatments to antibiotics

✗ Improve the reading of information by changing the formatting of the text

Adjusting for recurrence, complication, and adverse event rates using data from the literature

Improved description of adverse reactions

Clarification on the low level of evidence for alternative treatments (cranberry, hydration)

Improved, more spacious page layout

Numerical probabilities

Validation of the pictograms

Good understanding of adverse reaction data

Validation of the pictograms

Adjustment using data from the literature

Addition of bibliographical references

Adding the PtDA update date

Clarification of values (implicit and explicit)

Validation of the values explored

Validation of the concept of slider left blank but needs to be explained

 

Legend for the blank slider

Guidance in deliberation

✗ Add a color gradient to the sliders, and don’t put the slider in the center by default

Slider format and polarization validation

✗ Non-contributing final slider

✗ Make it clear that the patient’s decision is made orally with her doctor

✗ Coloring the sliders

Changing the slider graphics

Final slider replaced by a sentence encouraging deliberation with the doctor

Guidance in communication

✗ Reading of the PtDA to be accompanied by the doctor

✗ Fear of a difficulty of use due to lack of time, in particular with the sliders

Elements to be included in training to use the PtDA

Reading and comprehension level

Understandable slider terms

✗ Prefer the term “drinking water” to “hydration”

 

Clarification of the definition of resistance

Replacing the term hydration

Other

✗ Enhance contrast, favor a uniform background

Pink color validation

✗ Enhance contrast

Improved contrast

  1. ✗ elements to improve elements validated FG focus group, II Individual interview.