Skip to main content

Table 4 GP’s reason, management, and satisfaction on tele-ECG consulting

From: Tele-ECG consulting and outcomes on primary care patients in a low-to-middle income population: the first experience from Makassar telemedicine program, Indonesia

Variables

Normal ECG

(n = 253)

Abnormal ECG

(n = 252)

Total

(n = 505)

p-value

GP’s reason for tele-ECG:

 Manifested CVD symptoms

76 (30.0)

116 (46.0)

192 (38.0)

< 0.001

 Unable to interpret the ECG

2 (0.8)

12 (4.8)

14 (2.8)

0.007

 Ask for an expert opinion

175 (69.2)

121 (48.0)

296 (58.6)

< 0.001

 Othersa

0 (0.0)

3 (1.2)

3 (0.6)

0.124

Management after tele-ECG:

 Refer to hospital

0 (0.0)

88 (34.9)

88 (17.4)

< 0.001

 Outpatient without medications

183 (72.3)

80 (31.7)

263 (52.1)

< 0.001

 Outpatient with new or continued medications

70 (27.7)

84 (33.3)

154 (30.5)

0.167

Medications at primary care following tele-ECG consultation:

 Aspirin

2 (0.8)

49 (19.4)

51 (10.1)

< 0.001

 Clopidogrela

0 (0.0)

8 (3.2)

8 (1.6)

0.004

 Beta blockera

0 (0.0)

8 (3.2)

8 (1.6)

0.004

 Calcium-channel blocker

53 (20.9)

95 (37.7)

148 (29.3)

< 0.001

 ACE inhibitor

7 (2.8)

54 (21.4)

61 (12.1)

< 0.001

 Angiotensin receptor blocker

4 (1.6)

10 (4.0)

14 (2.8)

0.102

 Diuretic

0 (0.0)

17 (6.7)

17 (3.4)

< 0.001

 Nitrate

13 (5.1)

47 (18.7)

60 (11.9)

< 0.001

 Lipid-lowering agents

8 (3.2)

39 (15.5)

47 (9.3)

< 0.001

GP’s satisfaction on tele-ECG:

 Yes

232 (91.7)

247 (98.0)

479 (94.9)

0.001

  1. Values are n (%) or mean. Comparison was performed using Pearson Chi-square test
  2. ECG electrocardiogram, CVD cardiovascular disease
  3. aComparison using Fisher’s Exact test. The study design required the GPs to send all ECG assessments to the database center