Skip to main content

Table 3 Ordered logistic regression of SRH for all PHCWs

From: The effect of family doctor policy practice on primary health-care workers’ health in Hongkou District of Shanghai, China: varied by occupational divisions?

Variable

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR

P value

95% CI

OR

P value

95% CI

OR

P value

95% CI

Sociodemographic characteristics

 Age

0.969**

0.007

0.947–0.991

0.98

0.112

0.957–1.005

0.985

0.231

0.960–1.009

 Gender

1.886**

0.004

1.222–2.909

2.047**

2.047

1.268–3.302

2.428***

0.000

1.480–3.983

Hukou (Ref. = This subdistrict, Shanghai)

 Other subdistricts, Shanghai

1.429

0.129

0.901–2.263

1.319

0.246

0.826–2.105

1.313

0.294

0.789–2.184

 Other provinces

2.602**

0.006

1.318–5.139

2.612**

0.006

1.312–5.200

2.370*

0.022

1.133–4.958

Education (Ref. = High school or below)

 Bachelor degree

   

2.029

0.111

0.850–4.843

1.866

0.176

0.755–4.611

 Master degree

   

3.089

0.076

0.888–10.741

3.407

0.065

0.928–12.495

Annual income

   

0.977**

0.003

0.962–0.992

0.983*

0.032

0.967–0.998

Occupational categories (Ref. = Family doctor)

 Family nurse

   

1.950*

0.013

1.154–3.293

1.980*

0.016

1.136–3.452

 Public health doctor

   

1.641

0.140

0.849–3.170

1.593

0.192

0.791–3.210

 Others

   

1.674

0.054

0.992–2.825

2.034*

0.013

1.163–3.560

Workplace environments

 Information technology system (Ref. = very poor)

  Poor

      

0.591

0.340

0.199–1.743

  Neutral

      

2.219

0.136

0.777–6.336

  Good

      

2.950*

0.049

1.002–8.675

  Very good

      

2.059

0.194

0.692–6.120

 Cultural environment (Ref. = very poor)

  Poor

      

3.519

0.080

0.861–

  Neutral

      

1.711

0.408

0.479–6.106

  Good

      

3.324

0.066

0.925–11.944

  Very good

      

4.738*

0.016

1.329–16.884

 Performance incentive (Ref. = very poor)

  Poor

      

2.223

0.061

0.964–5.119

  Neutral

      

2.602*

0.012

1.236–5.476

  Good

      

2.360*

0.044

1.022–5.447

  Very good

      

1.491

0.551

0.401–5.534

  Statistics

         

  N

561

561

558

  Log likelihood

− 552.7

− 544.6

− 508

  BIC

1175

1196.7

1250.1

  Pseudo R2

0.0269

0.0411

0.1015

  1. Notes: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; Insignificant variables including marital status, office environment, and facilities and equipment are hidden to ensure that the table is more simplified and readable
Back to article page

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us