Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of themes describing barriers and driver to medicines reconciliation

From: Barriers and facilitators of medicines reconciliation at transitions of care in Ireland – a qualitative study

 

Barriers

Facilitators

Innovation

• Complex - many different healthcare providers

• Poor existing communication pathways

• Tailoring processes to local needs

• Standard operating procedures and staff adoption of same

Healthcare Professionals

• Staff training and supervision

• Existing culture and hierarchies

• Interest and awareness of reconciliation

• Unclear lines of responsibility

• Time pressures and prioritization

• Institutional effort to boost profile of reconciliation

• Teaching prescribing

• Culture change

Patients

• Lack of health literacy

• Responsibility of prescribing information – patient vs HCP

• HCP commitment to patient education

• Empowering patients

• Risk stratifying/targeting those most at risk

• Involving patient supports e.g. family members, ICT, multi-compartment compliance aids

Social context

• Multiple prescribers not communicating

• Lack of effective multidisciplinary care (not supporting new roles, not sharing information)

• Clear, effective, systematic lines of communication

• Teamwork culture

• Local leaders, social learning and disseminating good practice

Organisation

• Lack of a coordinated ICT strategy

• Fallible paper-based systems

• System not robust enough to accommodate different patient presentations e.g. elective vs non-elective

• Service availability not reflecting need

• Lack of funding/remuneration to expand activities

• Training, supervision, capacity of NCHDs all limited

• HPs absent from hospital discharge

• Clinical and prescribing information not intrinsically linked

• Funding to increase staff/service capability e.g. 8 am-8 pm, more FTEs

• ICT solutions – linked prescribing databases, decision support systems

• Greater involvement of pharmacists e.g. pharmacist prescribing, medicines use reviews

Political, legal and economic

• Ambiguity around official ‘MedRec’ policy

• Disconnect between policy and practice

• Discrepancy between private and publicly funded patients

• Contractual/remuneration concerns

• Data protection concerns

• Positive steps by health authority appointing health informatics lead

• Putting in place systems to support good prescribing practice

• Feedback on good/bad practice

  1. HCP Healthcare Professional, ICT Information Communication Technology, FTE Full Time Equivalent, NCHD Non-consultant Hospital Doctor, HP Hospital Pharmacist