Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlations between regions, sociodemography, healthcare utilisation and commitment to GP: results of a multivariate linear regression adjusted for random effects on the levels of German federal states, administrative districts and GP practices (n = 753)

From: Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

ß (95% CI)

p

ß (95% CI)

p

ß (95% CI)

p

Region

urban areasvs.rural areas

−1.06 (−1.81/−0.31)

0.006

−1.05 (−1.79/−0.31)

0.005

−0.85 (−1.58/−0.12)

0.022

environsvs.rural areas

−0.90 (− 1.74/−0.07)

0.034

−0.96 (− 1.79/− 0.13)

0.024

−0.80 (− 1.57/− 0.02)

0.045

Age (per 10 years)

0.20 (− 0.04/0.43)

0.098

0.28 (0.05/0.51)

0.018

0.25 (− 0.07/0.58)

0.126

Sex: malevs.female

1.09 (0.48/1.70)

< 0.001

1.02 (0.42/1.62)

0.001

1.14 (0.53/1.74)

< 0.001

Number of medical chronic conditions

0.17 (0.08/0.27)

< 0.001

0.15 (0.05/0.25)

0.003

0.10 (0.00/0.20)

0.043

Contacts with GP

  

0.33 (0.17/0.49)

< 0.001

0.30 (0.15/0.46)

< 0.001

Contacts with medical specialists

  

−0.86 (−1.49/−0.23)

0.007

− 0.75 (− 1.36/− 0.13)

0.018

Education (pursuant to CASMIN):

 medium vs. low

    

−0.60 (−1.29/0.08)

0.086

highvs.low

    

−1.74 (−2.68/−0.81)

< 0.001

Equivalised disposable income: natural logarithm

    

−0.93 (−1.56/− 0.30)

0.004

Professional situation

 employed

    

0.24 (−1.04/1.52)

0.714

 self-employed/freelancer

    

−0.57 (− 2.21/1.08)

0.499

 housewife/homemaker

    

0.88 (−1.11/2.88)

0.385

 job-seeking/unemployed

    

0.73 (−1.39/2.85)

0.499

 retiree/pensioner

    

0.01 (−1.45/1.46)

0.993

  1. Statistically significant results (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bolt and italic