Skip to main content

Context matters: a qualitative study of the practicalities and dilemmas of delivering integrated chronic care within primary and secondary care settings in a rural Malawian district

Abstract

Background

With the increasing double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in sub-Saharan Africa, health systems require new approaches to organise and deliver services for patients requiring long-term care. There is increasing recognition of the need to integrate health services, with evidence supporting integration of HIV and NCD services through the reorganisation of health system inputs, across system levels. This study investigates current practices of delivering and implementing integrated care for chronically-ill patients in rural Malawi, focusing on the primary level.

Methods

A qualitative study on chronic care in Phalombe district conducted between April 2016 and May 2017, with a sub-analysis performed on the data following a document analysis to understand the policy context and how integration is conceptualised in Malawi; structured observations in five of the 15 district health facilities, selected purposively to represent different levels of care (primary and secondary), and ownership (private and public). Fifteen interviews with healthcare providers and managers, purposively selected from the above facilities. Meetings with five non-governmental organisations to study their projects and support towards chronic care in Phalombe. Data were analysed using a thematic approach and managed in NVivo.

Results

Our study found that, while policies supported integration of various disease-specific programmes at point of care, integration efforts on the ground were severely hampered by human and health resource challenges e.g. inadequate consultation rooms, erratic supplies especially for NCDs, and an overstretched health workforce. There were notable achievements, though most prominent at the secondary level e.g. the establishment of a combined NCD clinic, initiating NCD screening within HIV services, and initiatives for integrated information systems.

Conclusion

In rural Malawi, major impediments to integrated care provision for chronically-ill patients include the frail state of primary healthcare services and sub-optimal NCD care at the lowest healthcare level. In pursuit of integrative strategies, opportunities lie in utilising and expanding community-based outreach strategies offering multi-disease screening and care with strong referral linkages; careful task delegation and role realignment among care teams supported with proper training and incentive mechanisms; and collaborative partnership between public and private sector actors to expand the resource-base and promoting cross-programme initiatives.

Peer Review reports

Background

Healthcare systems face an increasing demand for chronic care. Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer are among the largest contributor to global mortality, and over 70% of these deaths occurred in sub-Saharan African (sSA) and other low-income settings [1]. sSA countries continue to face a high burden of communicable diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis, which impacts individual health and the health system. This increasing double burden of chronic diseases (communicable and non-communicable) requires new approaches, including a reorientation of care that is more responsive to patients’ needs [2, 3].

Integrated care provides a possible solution to coordinate care more efficiently, especially for patients with complex needs [4]. While integration continues to gain attention in the international health discourse, its meaning and application varies widely [5,6,7]. First, the configuration of actors, institutions and resources in the provision of integrated care differs based on context, with different emphases placed on the pathways or forms in which integration is pursued. Second, multiple perspectives and relations among actors make it difficult to arrive at a common understanding of integration, which causes variation in defining. As such, there is limited conceptual clarity on integrated care and a plethora of terminologies used to describe integration. In attempts to simplify the concept, integration has been described as the logic of binding different health system parts together, requiring collaboration and linkages of different actors and institutions [8, 9]. Kodner and Spreeuwenberg [8] further elaborate this as “a coherent set of methods and models on the funding, administrative, organizational, service delivery and clinical levels designed to create connectivity, alignment and collaboration within and between the cure and care sectors …. Commonly identified goals for integrated care are improving efficiency in the coordination and delivery of health services, enhancing quality of care, maximising access and coverage, and improving user satisfaction [10]. Some integration frameworks specifically addressing chronic care include the Kaiser Permanente model which stratifies the population and offers interventions based on the staging of patient’s conditions, and the Chronic Care Model focuses on reorganisation of health system inputs and processes to improve patient outcomes [9, 11]. Valentijn et al’s framework is more encompassing and is derived from the various taxonomies of integrated care reported in existing literature [4, 12]. The type, breadth, and dimension of integration varies as a result of multiple variables within and beyond a health system, for example, the set of relationships between different professionals and institutions delivering care and the characteristics of patients in need of care [9, 13].

The need to better coordinate care for patients with multiple care needs has prompted health sector reforms in high-income countries to guide the restructuring of healthcare services [11]. In sSA, health services have traditionally been structured under disease-specific, largely donor funded infectious disease programmes such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, which contributed to lowering morbidity and mortality rates [14]. However, critics argue that disease-centred models cause fragmentation of services and diversion of resources, which further weaken public health systems [13,14,15]. The demand for integrated care has led to a shift in practice, especially in the HIV field, which has also been instigated by an increasing number of HIV patients presenting with multimorbidities [3, 16, 17]. The evidence-base on different service models for integrating HIV and NCD programmes has grown exponentially over the years [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The scope and degree of integration identified in these models vary from integrating NCD health promotion and screening activities within HIV services, to provision of comprehensive care for HIV and NCD patients in a single location and, in some settings, the presence of explicit policies guiding integration strategies [18, 19, 21,22,23]. However, scaling up existing integrated care initiatives has proved challenging, since these are pursued within contexts facing multiple impediments, including health workforce shortages and inadequate health financing [22, 25].

Malawi experiences a high HIV burden, with 1 million people are living with HIV [26]. NCD incidences are rapidly increasing, whereas in a 2009 nationwide STEPS survey of 5206 adults, 30% had hypertension and 8.9% reported a cardiovascular disease [27], recent statistics estimate the probability of death from the top four NCDs is 16.4% [28]. Tackling these problems has prompted the country to institute several reform initiatives. For HIV care, reforms include decentralising antiretroviral therapy (ART) to the community and primary healthcare level, and strengthening community-based structures to track and trace patients lost to care [29,30,31]. Other innovations include integrating HIV care with other services; such as tuberculosis screening and treatment, reproductive health, cervical cancer screening and, more recently, hypertension screening was included in the 2016 HIV guidelines [32]. Prior to the development and implementation of national NCD policies since 2011, isolated efforts to integrate NCD care within HIV services existed [32, 33]. For instance, one southern district, established an integrated chronic care clinic which enabled patients to access a continuum of care in a single visit [34]. However, significant gaps remain in the provision of universal and comprehensive health services to patients with other chronic conditions beyond HIV at the primary level. Recognition of and strategies for addressing these gaps have been articulated in the country’s current health strategy and include a focus on integrated care [35].

Since the evidence-base on integrated care largely comes from Western settings, more research is needed to identify strategies and forms of integration in resource-constrained sSA health systems, to expand our understanding of integrated care within these contexts. Particularly pertinent is the focus on integrated care application at the primary level, where the majority of people in sSA access their health care. Integrated care emerged as an important theme in our study on chronic care in a rural Malawian district, and in this paper, we explore the current practice of delivering integrated care for chronically-ill patients with a particular focus on the primary level, the (potential) challenges to integrating care, and implications on practice and response measures. We present our findings using the integrated care framework developed by Valentijn et al. [4]; a framework informed by an extensive review on integrated care conceptualisation and deemed suitable for our particular study as it takes the primary care level as its point of departure for integration across the care continuum.

Methods

Study design

This paper is based on a sub-analysis of qualitative data from a larger mixed methods study, which examined local models for chronic care and self-management support in southern Malawi [36]. The primary dataset was collected within two rounds (April to July 2016, and March to May 2017), in Malawi, involving multiple methods and respondents [37]. The data presented in this paper focuses on the concept of integrated care and how it is shaped and applied at the lower level of care. Our sub-analysis was guided by the following question: how and to what extent are integrated care approaches utilised in local models for chronic care?

Study context

This study was conducted in Phalombe, a rural district located south-east of Malawi near the border with Mozambique with a population estimate of 390,000 [38]. The district has the lowest socio-economic indicators compared to the other 27 Malawian districts. In addition to infrastructural challenges, it has high illiteracy and poverty levels, with the majority of residents depending on farming and small-scale trading [38]. Healthcare in public facilities is universally free at the point of care, while services offered in private facilities, mostly operated by the Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM), charge user fees. The majority of residents access care in public primary healthcare (PHC) facilities, which consist of health centres, dispensaries, and health posts [35]. Given the absence of a government-owned hospital, secondary care is provided in a district public health centre, although most referrals from PHC facilities are directed to the district mission hospital [38].

Data sources, sampling, and data collection procedures

A document analysis was conducted with the following purpose; to interpret the policy context on chronic care delivery and how integrated care is conceptualised and instructed at the service level. VA conducted the search of related documents and identified the information for assessment. Document sources included district implementation plans and health facility records, clinical guidelines for HIV and NCDs, and different policy documents such as the National Health Sector Strategic Plan [35, 39, 40].

Key-informant interviews

Fifteen interviewees were selected, using the purposive sampling technique, in consultation with senior health managers and health facility administration. Interviewees were identified from five of the 15 district health facilities, which represented the district health services structure and various levels of care (i.e. three primary level facilities and the only two secondary level facilities providing referral services). These facilities were part of the catchment area of our larger study [36]. Interviewee selection aimed for representation and diversity by gender, professional cadre (clinical, non-clinical, and health managers with varying responsibilities in chronic care), and health facility category (public and private; PHC and referral facilities).

Topic guides for the larger study were developed based on themes identified from the literature on chronic care and from themes emerging during data collection (see File S1). This paper presents a sub-analysis of the primary dataset, in which integrated care was explored in more depth, following an abstraction of our findings around: 1) perceptions of the organisation of chronic care services and local challenges in implementing national strategies and guidelines such as those for NCDs and HIV; 2) innovations in service delivery and opportunities for cross-learning across different disease-specific programmes; 3) collaboration between public and private sector actors and its impact on integration; and 4) potential challenges to integrating care including health services financing. The topic guides were pre-tested at first use and some minor, mostly language, changes were made.

Interviews were held in private rooms/interviewees workstation, lasting between 45 and 90 min, at a convenient time in accordance with pre-booked appointments. Interviews were conducted by VA, a female doctoral research fellow with extensive qualitative research experience, with support from a trained female Malawian research assistant trained on qualitative research methods. The interviews were mostly conducted in English except two, which were held in the local language Chichewa, then later translated to English. Audio files were transcribed verbatim by the research assistant and verified by VA. Personal identifiers were replaced with codes for anonymity. In File S2, we reflect on our positionality in the research process and report this using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) checklist.

Structured observations and meetings

Structured observations in the five health facilities studied aimed at understanding and documenting how chronic care services were organised in the district. Observations conducted by VA and the research assistant at PHC level clinics covered HIV and general outpatient services, and at district referral facilities, palliative, NCD, and mental healthcare services. During these single facility visits, information documented included the type of services provided, personnel responsible, client flow, and approaches in service delivery. A structured observation tool developed for this study was used to guide notetaking and in drafting the final comprehensive report (see File S3). Data on patients’ experiences with health services and interaction with service providers in the health facilities included in this study are reported in separate publications [41, 42]. We visited five non-governmental organisations (NGOs) implementing donor-funded projects in the district to study their programme activities, and understand their working relations with the district health office in supporting chronic care services. These organisations were identified through discussions and referrals from key-informant interviewees. The focus of each organisation varied: three organisations focused on various aspects of HIV care, one offered community outreach services, and one focused on health system strengthening. Discussions with representatives from each NGO, i.e. senior project staff, were open-ended lasting 30 to 60 min, guided by the above broad topics and captured in detailed hand written notes.

Data analysis

Data from all sources (interview transcripts, structured observations, meeting reports and data extracted from document analysis) were managed using NVivo 11 (QSR international) and analysed with a thematic analysis approach [43]. The coding framework, which included codes emerging from the data and deductively from the topic guide questions was developed by VA in consultation with CA. VA read the transcripts, coded the data and generated charts of grouped themes, which were exported to Microsoft Word to explore emerging patterns and shared with co-authors for further interpretation. For our sub-analysis, we used the charts to discuss and compare between the grouped themes and patterns with a view to further articulate the major categories (informed by both Valentijn et al’s integrated framework and the data itself). These formed the basis for organizing and presenting the research findings. At the end of the larger study, representatives from the participating health facilities and district health management team attended feedback meetings (n = 5), where findings were shared.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from two institutions (EMGO+ WC2015–080, 27-Oct-2015; NCRSH P.11/15/64, 10-Dec-2015). At the point of introducing the study and obtaining informed consent from research participants, the interest in the research topic, which formed part of the first author’s doctoral thesis was openly declared. All eligible participants approached for interviews provided written informed consent, and verbal informed consent was obtained to conduct observations and meetings related to the study.

Results

Table 1 below presents characteristics of study participants. The results are discussed under four thematic areas which relate to the integration concepts as described by Valentijn et al. [4]. The areas include: system integration, which examines the current policy framework and how integration is perceived; organisational integration of chronic care interventions and efforts towards implementing an integrated approach; health workforce capacity for professional integration; and factors potentially affecting integration efforts (e.g. health financing).

Table 1 Sampling and participants characteristics

The policy framework and how integration is perceived and practiced

A prerequisite to facilitate system integration is the presence of a supportive policy framework. The concept of integration has been mentioned in a number of Malawian policy documents. For instance, the National Health Sector Strategic Plan II (2017–2022), which provides an overarching national strategy for implementing health services, emphasizes ‘efficiency and effectiveness’ as important guiding principles [35]. The strategy states: “… opportunities shall be created to facilitate integration of health service delivery to leverage on efficiency and effectiveness in addressing health needs of people …” [35]. Through promoting coordination and collaboration between actors operating in health and other sectors, the strategy envisions reduced fragmentation and duplication. Furthermore, in delivering chronic care, specific interventions are outlined in the national NCD action plan and HIV clinical guidelines [39, 40]. The NCD action plan frames the interventions within a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach to promote the delivery of a continuum of care in a holistic and integrated manner [39]. The 2016 HIV guidelines, emphasise on the delivery of interventions at various service delivery points such as different departments within a health facility (horizontal integration) and across different levels of care (vertical integration) [40].

Some of the programme coordinators interviewed spoke of the importance of coordinating the programmes and activities, which target chronically-ill patients (both those with HIV and an NCD). They reported having focal persons at the district level for HIV, NCD, palliative services, and mental health. This was aimed at facilitating coordination of chronic care interventions within facility and community settings, and delivered by Ministry of Health (MoH) personnel and district partner NGOs. Although health interventions have been organised under distinct vertical programmes as stipulated in Malawi’s essential health package [38], the coordinators interviewed reported that they had a core responsibility to pursue opportunities for linkages across different programmes and levels of care. These attempts were made through joint planning review meetings organised at the district health management team level, and in liaison with NGO representatives. However, this largely depended on the nature of relations, reporting and communication systems, in addition to the extent of collaboration forged by these set of actors.

… sometimes there are partners [NGOs] who we [MoH] sit down and discuss what the partners have, and we tell them what we want … or what we are looking for, and what they are doing may not match, but because they have drugs, we can discuss with them and they help us.(KII15_Manager_District)

Coordination of different professionals and health partners as a key mandate of the district authorities was identified needing strengthening as interviewees suggested the need for joint planning meetings especially in the formulation of district implementation plans, and increasing participation in district stakeholder meetings where all health and non-health sector stakeholders are engaged, usually organised by the District Commissioner or using other networking forums (see File S4, quotes 1–3).

Organisation of chronic care and efforts towards implementing an integrated approach

Within PHC settings, our observations revealed variations in the delivery of chronic care as summarised in Table 2. In most of the PHC facilities, NCD services were provided as part of general outpatient services. For HIV, efforts were made to integrate HIV services across different service points within private and public facilities including within maternal and child health clinics, general outpatient, and youth-friendly service stations. This differentiated approach to HIV service delivery, it aimed at catering to the specific needs of a diverse patient population such as lactating mothers with their HIV exposed infants, and adolescents living with HIV. Furthermore, HIV services integrated testing and screening for tuberculosis, cervical cancer, and other opportunistic infections at the point of care. To strengthen referral linkages and close patient monitoring, health facilities worked closely with HIV expert-patients and community-based structures operated by community health volunteers, with the latter providing a range of health and social services (see File S4, quotes 4–5).

Table 2 Organisation of care for selected chronic conditions at primary and secondary level

At community level, outreach clinics were organised to target hard-to-reach communities, offering care closer to patients and facilitating vertical integration. One NGO offered health promotion and curative services, including for some chronic conditions, during weekly mobile clinics. The district health office dispatched a team of clinicians to all its PHC facilities during scheduled clinical outreach visits, offering both general and specialist care. However, the regularity of these clinics depended on availability of transport, materials and on the proper publicising of these events to community members, as one respondent explains (see also file S4, quote 6):

… like NCDs and mental health, we do outreach clinics like every Thursday, so we move around health centres. If we are provided transport, and have enough drugs, and the staff are enough, we go around because it is like a team. We go with the orthopaedic, ophthalmologist, general clinician, psychiatric nurse, pharmacy and even laboratory [staff] …(KII15_Manager_District)

At the secondary/referral level, the district health centre (equivalent to a level II health facility) initiated a clinic for patients with diabetes and other cardiovascular conditions, operating twice weekly with NGO support. Palliative services were initially accessible only at secondary level, but since 2017, two public PHC facilities were elevated to offer these services to cancer patients, improving access in remote settings.

Interviewees reported several factors hampering the extent of integration in delivering chronic care, especially in public PHC settings. One barrier was the limited physical space. Due to the sheer volume of HIV patients and limited consultation rooms in public health facilities, HIV clinics operated as stand-alone clinics on designated days of the week, to address challenges encountered. Consequently, this implied marshalling a substantial portion of health facility staff to run these special clinics, which restricted operation of other clinical services. One manager described this challenging situation as:

R: … we lack enough consultation [rooms]. The same consultation where the NCD clinics is happening … the [following] day is another clinic … if we had a little bit considerable number of consultation [rooms], then anybody can come and be provided with services …(KII19_Manager_District)

Other barriers interviewees reported were linked to the non-availability of medical supplies and health service infrastructure. Most facilities lacked basic screening equipment such as blood pressure monitors, glucometers, and urine dipsticks to enable point-of-care diagnosis for NCD conditions. Hence, patients were often advised to seek these services in private PHC or referral facilities at their expense. The absence of a central HIV diagnostic and laboratory unit meant transferring samples to other districts, affecting timely analysis. A notable challenge for most public PHC facilities was the interrupted supply of essential NCD drugs, including for diabetes and epilepsy reported to last for several months, which affected availability of comprehensive services for this group of patients (see file S4, quotes 7–9).

… last time we had no Glibenclamide for diabetes and currently we do not have … Metformine, which means [patients] are suffering … like epilepsy, we have one drug and before five drugs were out of stock … if the Central Medical Stores [National level] does not have the drugs, we [district health team] do not have the capacity to procure …(KII15_Manager_District)

The health workforce capacity for professional integration

Many districts in Malawi, including Phalombe, experience severe health workforce shortages. Only 55.1% (n = 901) of Phalombe’s health workforce positions are filled, with a critical shortage of clinical staff (Table 3). Observations made at the different facilities showed disparities in the distribution of staff, both in volume and cadre. HIV programmes were executed by multidisciplinary teams consisting of trained cascade monitors, triage staff, health promotors, defaulter tracers, data clerks, and others (see Table 2), while palliative, and mental health programmes had more limited team compositions, and lacked a base of trained providers.

R: … we do not have personnel who can do clinics for other chronic conditions … it will be good if the Ministry or stakeholders train a few individuals who can [operate] these clinics, because if people [patients] are always told to travel to Phalombe [district referral] … they could access the same services here [PHC facility] … (KII09_Nurse_Private-PHC)

Table 3 District health workforce both public and private health facilitiesa

The few clinicians offering NCD services at general outpatient departments reported lacking technical knowledge and expressed a desire for further training. The limited availability of key cadres such as community health nurses and public health officers, principally trained to coordinate community-based services like health promotion and outreach activities was another reported challenge. This resulted in the unstructured delegation of responsibilities to Health Surveillance Assistants (i.e. government-paid community health worker cadre in Malawi), who were overstretched with other programme activities and lacked proper training in the management of chronic conditions.

The necessary components for integrated care such as the provision of supportive resources, capacity-building opportunities, and a work environment that facilitates an integrationist approach were explored among health managers interviewed and in meetings with NGO representatives, who described the approaches and challenges of putting these components in place (see File S4, quotes 10–11). First, the need to avail clinical guidelines/job aides within workstations was recognised, although access to NCD supportive resources was limited, and mainly attributed to the nascent NCD programme at national level. Second, mentorship and training opportunities were largely programme-led and depended on resources allocated to support for instance senior staff in conducting regular supervision visits in PHC facilities. Initiatives introduced by NGOs working in collaboration with the district health office, such as having an integrated information system (NCD master cards and electronic medical records for HIV patients), were perceived by some of the respondents to improve documentation, enhance monitoring and evaluation, and improve patient management. In addressing the health workforce shortage, NGO project staff were entrenched in public health facilities and worked alongside existing MoH personnel to support with clinical care. Furthermore, the liaison between MoH frontline providers and volunteer-operated community-based structures was also seen as an opportunity to assist healthcare teams to fulfil the role of a more community-oriented primary care team.

Issues of financing

Malawi’s health sector is largely externally funded (61.6% donor funds) and funding allocation not equally matched across various programmes; for instance, of the USD 663 million total expenditure on health in the 2015/2016 financial year, over 30% was allocated to HIV compared to less than 10% to NCDs [44]. The national government, through the fiscal transfer framework, disburses revenue to district authorities to implement approved budgets linked to the district implementation plans. Health managers interviewed reported that their district implementation plans were essentially informed by a resource mapping exercise of programmes implemented by NGOs, followed by an allocation of funds to under-resourced programmes through the sector-wide approach. For instance, given that the majority of NGOs present in the district supported the implementation of HIV services, there were attempts to ensure health budget funds were prioritised and directed towards NCD and mental health activities. Thus, the financing of a complete service package at different service levels in the district depended largely on the flexibility of NGOs to also accommodate non-programme activities (see file S4, quote 12). This dependency affected both the autonomy and ability of district managers in setting out their course under guidance of national level strategies:

… because we are resource constrained and manpower constrained, we [district health department] are not on top … these [NGOs] come in the district and then we recommend to them over and above what they have designed for their services …(KII18_Manager_District)

Over one-third of health services in Malawi are offered by private-sector providers, and predominantly under the Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM) [35]. The national government sub-contracts CHAM health facilities to provide subsidized healthcare. Interviewees reported that patients incur costs for services not included in the service package, especially for NCDs and expressed the need to support NCD care (see file S4, quote 13). This acts as a deterrence to access and affordability of pro-longed care as expressed by the following respondent:

… they [patients] pay consultation fees and they have to pay for drugs and lab tests … but because it is a life-long problem for them [patients] … some of them are being assisted by their children since they are no longer productive … It [healthcare services] should be sort of like universal, irrespective of where they go; whether to a private hospital or government hospital they [patients] should get free services.(KII06_Clinican_District)

As a border district, the national ‘free’ public healthcare policy attracts patients from neighbouring country to Phalombe, which results in overstretched services within some of the public PHC facilities. Porous borders and challenges of vetting non-resident patients at the point of care puts additional pressure on district health services and budget.

[some] of the people that access this health facility are from Mozambique … If those people were paying something, at least we might have some resources, or we could add more resources to the already few resources that we have.(KII03_Nurse_Public-PHC)

Discussion

Our study provides qualitative evidence of the practices and complexities of optimally employing an integrated approach in delivering chronic care for HIV and NCD patients at the primary care level in a rural Malawian district. Our results show how the continued, vertical organisation of disease-specific programmes, policies, and financial allocation affected this approach. The rationale for disease prioritisation as well as the implications of such approach for African health systems have been widely documented [4, 13, 45,46,47]. This study adds to this body of knowledge by highlighting the current disparities between HIV patients and those with NCDs in terms of their access to essential health services at the primary level. For both patient groups, provision of an integrated care package is severely hampered by the frail state of primary healthcare and the still nascent presence of NCD-specific services. Similar situations are observed in other Malawian districts, with a recent report revealing that approximately 10–20% of all health centres are fully equipped to treat common NCDs [48].

The ongoing experimentation with integrated care in Malawi and surrounding countries in the region have produced important lessons on how to pursue and strengthen integrative strategies at the primary care level. With regards to system integration, our results indicate that integration is mentioned in health policy documents, however, proper implementation of integration policies requires coordination of programmes and activities, improved stakeholders collaboration and combination of both horizontal and vertical integration approaches. However enforcing system changes is a challenge in most resource constrained contexts. For instance, while the ideal is to have multi-purpose frontline health facilities, where patients’ access a continuum of services irrespective of their conditions, our results bring to the forefront challenges in the availability and organisation of resources to support integration. Studies on integrated HIV-NCD care demonstrate that improving patient flow processes such as sorting appointments and referring patients to the appropriate service stations (e.g. for drug refill or consultation with a clinician) could be beneficial to facilities experiencing high-volume patient load and operating within limited space [22, 24, 34, 49]. As part of primary prevention strategies and policy recommendations, including multi-disease screening within triage processes promotes early detection and management of complications associated with chronic diseases, though it requires ensuring diagnostics are regularly available [23, 50]. Our results show clear deficiencies in the availability and capacity of the health workforce, further complicated by sub-optimal working conditions to offer integrated care. Tackling health workforce deficiencies requires enforcing carefully crafted task-shifting strategies to redistribute tasks and redefine healthcare teams’ responsibilities, especially where teams have to embrace ‘newer’ responsibilities and include lay health worker cadre [25, 51, 52]. In our study context, a further engagement of state-paid health surveillance assistants in absorbing tasks such as patient education, triage, and documentation could help ease clinician’s workload and allow them to focus on technical tasks. Complementary to these efforts, requires ensuring the requisite clinical resources are available, offering regular training and supportive supervision to health professionals and other personnel offering community-based services [49, 52]. The gaps in service provision at facility level that were reported could be mitigated by expanding service points at community level. In rural underserved settings like ours, community-outreach clinics can be utilised to offer multi-disease screening services, treatment and early referrals, as demonstrated in Uganda [53].

The initiation and scaling-up of integrated care strategies implies increased costs, though this should result in more efficient services, improved health outcomes, and cost-savings over time [9]. As our findings suggest, the prevailing health-financing situation characterised by lean national funding for some chronic conditions, over-reliance on donor-funded projects, and inadequate domestic financing puts immense pressure on efforts towards integrated care provision [32]. In tackling these challenges, we acknowledge it requires collective efforts by all actors including national government and private sector/donors, and more importantly thinking beyond investment for disease-specific programmes to focus more on strengthening health systems. On this basis, we make the following proposals. At national level, expansion of health budgets, provision of technical support to sub-national structures, and redirecting developmental aid towards sector-wide initiatives are worth. At district level, more efforts are needed to facilitate cross-programme coordination and investment channelled to improve primary care operations, including strengthening medical supply chain and infrastructural upgrades. The prominent role of private-sector providers in Malawi’s healthcare system prompts the need for national government to review and negotiate service level agreements, to facilitate expansion of essential health service packages that accommodate provision of critical services, especially for NCDs. Through this, the promise of achieving universal health coverage by providing free to subsidized chronic care services at primary level addresses the financial barriers to accessing care Malawians face, particularly those residing in rural settings [54].

Limitations

This study was conducted in a single rural Malawian district, hence generalizability of findings is limited. Our study synthesized findings from healthcare providers and health managers interviews, structured observation of healthcare practices to understand features of integration in this context. However, there are important factors beyond what we studied such as patient systems, cultures and norms which influence integration practices [13]. Our study did not explore to what extent integration practices impact on outcome measures such as organisational efficiencies, which may require applying other methodological approaches such as clinical audits or review of programming documentation/data. Using Valentijn’s framework [4], was helpful in conceptualising integration in the primary care context, although our data was limited in exploring all dimensions of integration equally. Future research could focus on assessing how integrated care impacts on patient outcomes especially those with multimorbidities, and its relevance in health system strengthening initiatives especially in low-income countries.

Conclusion

The provision of integrated care for patients requiring long-term care has become an important health system reform, and there is growing evidence on how these reforms unfold in practice. Our findings point to the complexity of implementing integrative strategies within resource-limited PHC settings like rural Malawi, and to the progress made in the face of such complexities. Contextual factors, such as staffing levels and an infrastructure of vertical disease programmes influenced the practical implementation of national policies and strategies in support of integrated care provision. Further investment and support is needed towards primary healthcare provision in general and NCD services, particularly in terms of clinical resources, ensuring regular supplies, and provision of training and mentorship to frontline providers to enable them offer integrated care as close to the community as possible.

Availability of data and materials

Freely available data includes data in results table, supplementary files, in summary form under main headings, and anonymised quotations from interviews. Access restrictions applies to some data, such as interview transcripts, due to potentially sensitive information and may contain identifiable information. Hence sharing of original transcripts may be a threat to confidentiality and breach of data sharing agreements included in the consent forms used in this study. Additional approvals will be required from the ethical review committees for applications to re-use data, in line with informed consent agreements. Applications can be submitted to the National Committee on Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Malawi (ncrsh@ncst.mw); and the EMGO+, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (wc.emgo@vumc.nl).

Abbreviations

ART:

Antiretroviral therapy

CHAM:

Christian Health Association of Malawi

CHBC:

Community home-based care

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HSA:

Health surveillance assistant

MoH:

Ministry of health

NCD:

Non-communicable disease

NGO:

Non-governmental organisation

PHC:

Primary healthcare

sSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

VIA:

Visual inspection with acetic acid

References

  1. 1.

    Dicker D, Nguyen G, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1684–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Atun R, Jaffar S, Nishtar S, Knaul FM, Barreto ML, Nyirenda M, Banatvala N, Piot P. Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):690–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rabkin M, El-Sadr WM. Why reinvent the wheel? Leveraging the lessons of HIV scale-up to confront non-communicable diseases. Global Public Health. 2011;6(3):247–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nuno R, Coleman K, Bengoa R, Sauto R. Integrated care for chronic conditions: the contribution of the ICCC framework. Health Policy. 2012;105(1):55–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    World Health Organization. Framework on integrated people-centred health services. Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly A; 2016. p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    World Health Organization. Integrated health services–what and why. Technical Brief. 2008;1:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications–a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nolte E, McKee M. Integration and chronic care: a review. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective; 2008. p. 64–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M. Integrated care. Int J Integr Care. 2001;1:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    World Health Organization. Integrated care models: An overview. Working document. Copenhagen (DK): WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Valentijn PP, Boesveld IC, van der Klauw DM, Ruwaard D, Struijs JN, Molema JJ, Bruijnzeels MA, Vrijhoef HJ. Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15:e003.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Watt N, Sigfrid L, Legido-Quigley H, Hogarth S, Maimaris W, Otero-García L, Perel P, Buse K, McKee M, Piot P. Health systems facilitators and barriers to the integration of HIV and chronic disease services: a systematic review. Health Pol Plann. 2017;32(suppl_4):iv13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mills A, Rasheed F, Tollman S. Strengthening health systems, in Disease control priorities in developing countries; 2006. p. 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Criel B, De Brouwere V, Dugas S. Integration of vertical programmes in multi-function health services: ITGPress; 1997.

  16. 16.

    Bekker L-G, Alleyne G, Baral S, Cepeda J, Daskalakis D, Dowdy D, Dybul M, Eholie S, Esom K, Garnett G. Advancing global health and strengthening the HIV response in the era of the sustainable development goals: the international AIDS society—lancet commission. Lancet. 2018;392(10144):312–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lazarus JV, Safreed-Harmon K, Barton SE, Costagliola D, Dedes N, del Amo VJ, Gatell JM, Baptista-Leite R, Mendão L, Porter K. Beyond viral suppression of HIV–the new quality of life frontier. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Draper CA, Draper CE, Bresick GF. Alignment between chronic disease policy and practice: Case study at a primary care facility. PLoS One. 2014;9:8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Haregu TN, Setswe G, Elliott J, Oldenburg B. Integration of HIV/AIDS and noncommunicable diseases in developing countries: rationale, policies and models. Int J Healthcare. 2015;1(1):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    UNAIDS. Chronic care of HIV and noncommunicable diseases: How to leverage the HIV experience; 2011. p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Haldane V, Legido-Quigley H, Chuah FLH, Sigfrid L, Murphy G, Ong SE, Cervero-Liceras F, Watt N, Balabanova D, Hogarth S. Integrating cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and diabetes with HIV services: a systematic review. AIDS Care; 2017. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Duffy M, Ojikutu B, Andrian S, Sohng E, Minior T, Hirschhorn LR. Non-communicable diseases and HIV care and treatment: models of integrated service delivery. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22(8):926–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Juma K, Reid M, Roy M, Vorkoper S, Temu TM, Levitt NS, Oladepo O, Zakus D, Yonga G. From HIV prevention to non-communicable disease health promotion efforts in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review. Aids. 2018;32:S63–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Njuguna B, Vorkoper S, Patel P, Reid MJ, Vedanthan R, Pfaff C, Park PH, Fischer L, Laktabai J, Pastakia SD. Models of integration of HIV and noncommunicable disease care in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned and evidence gaps. Aids. 2018;32:S33–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Topp SM, Chipukuma JM, Chiko MM, Matongo E, Bolton-Moore C, Reid SE. Integrating HIV treatment with primary care outpatient services: opportunities and challenges from a scaled-up model in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2012;28(4):347–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    UNAIDS. UNAIDS DATA. 2018. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/unaids-data-2018_en.pdf. [cited 19 Apr 2019.

  27. 27.

    Msyamboza KP, Ngwira B, Dzowela T, Mvula C, Kathyola D, Harries AD, Bowie C. The burden of selected chronic non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in Malawi: nationwide STEPS survey. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20316.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    WHO Regional Office for Africa. Malawi Factsheet of Health Statistics. 2018. Available from: http://www.aho.afro.who.int/profiles_information/images/d/d8/Malawi-Statistical_Factsheet.pdf. [cited 1 Sep 2019].

  29. 29.

    Bemelmans M, Baert S, Goemaere E, Wilkinson L, Vandendyck M, van Cutsem G, Silva C, Perry S, Szumilin E, Gerstenhaber R, Kalenga L, Biot M, Ford N. Community-supported models of care for people on HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(8):968–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Harries AD, Zachariah R, Jahn A, Schouten EJ, Kamoto K. Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in Malawi-implications for managing other chronic diseases in resource-limited countries. JAIDS. 2009;52:S14–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zachariah R, Teck R, Buhendwa L, Fitzerland M, Labana S, Chinji C, Humblet P, Harries AD. Community support is associated with better antiretroviral treatment outcomes in a resource-limited rural district in Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(1):79–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mwagomba BLM, Ameh S, Bongomin P, Juma PA, MacKenzie RK, Kyobutungi C, Lukhele N, Mwangi KJM, Amberbir A, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Opportunities and challenges for evidence-informed HIV-noncommunicable disease integrated care policies and programs: lessons from Malawi, South Africa, Swaziland and Kenya. AIDS. 2018;32:S21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lupafya PC, Mwagomba BL, Hosig K, Maseko LM, Chimbali H. Implementation of Policies and Strategies for Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in Malawi: Challenges and Opportunities. Health Educ Behav. 2016;43(1 Suppl):64s–9s.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wroe EB, Kalanga N, Mailosi B, Mwalwanda S, Kachimanga C, Nyangulu K, Dunbar E, Kerr L, Nazimera L, and Dullie L. Leveraging HIV platforms to work toward comprehensive primary care in rural Malawi: the Integrated Chronic Care Clinic. Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015. 3(4): p. 270–6.

  35. 35.

    Government of Malawi. Health Sector Strategic Plan II 2017–2022: Towards universal health coverage. Malawi: Ministry of Health Lilongwe; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Kondowe K, Mutchiyeni JZ, Kajumi M, Criel B, Lazarus JV, Quinlan T, Bunders-Aelen J. Moving to a strong (er) community health system: analysing the role of community health volunteers in the new national community health strategy in Malawi. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e000996.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Malawi Ministry of Health. Phalombe Distrct Health Sector Multi-year Plan 2013–2016. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Government of Malawi. National Action Plan for the Prevention and Management of Non-Communicable Diseases in Malawi 2012–2016. Malawi: Ministry of Health Lilongwe; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Government of Malawi. Malawi Guidelines for Clinical Management of HIV in Children and Adults. Malawi: Ministry of Health Lilongwe; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Bunders-Aelen J, Lazarus JV, Criel B. Patient–provider perspectives on self-management support and patient empowerment in chronic care: a mixed-methods study in a rural sub-Saharan setting. J Adv Nurs. 2019.

  42. 42.

    Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Kajumi M, De Man J, Criel B, Bunders-Aelen J. Patients experiences of self-management and strategies for dealing with chronic conditions in rural Malawi. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research ed. D. Silverman. 2004. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

  44. 44.

    Ministry of Health. Malawi National Heath Accounts Report for Fiscal Years 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. Lilongwe - Malawi: Department of Planning and Policy Development: Ministry of Health; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Stange KC. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(2):100–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Garrib A, Birungi J, Lesikari S, Namakoola I, Njim T, Cuevas L, Niessen L, Mugisha K, Mutungi G, Mghamba J. Integrated care for human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes and hypertension in Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018.

  47. 47.

    Poku NK. How should the post-2015 response to AIDS relate to the drive for universal health coverage? Global Public Health. 2018;13(7):765–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Malawi NCDI Poverty commission. Reframing Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries for the Poorest Billion. Lilongwe - Malawi: Ministry of Health; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Pfaff C, Singano V, Akello H, Amberbir A, Berman J, Kwekwesa A, Banda V, Speight C, Allain T, van Oosterhout JJ. Early experiences integrating hypertension and diabetes screening and treatment in a human immunodeficiency virus clinic in Malawi. Int Health. 2018;10(6):495–501.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kachimanga C, Cundale K, Wroe E, Nazimera L, Jumbe A, Dunbar E, Kalanga N. Novel approaches to screening for noncommunicable diseases: lessons from Neno, Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2017;29(2):78–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Smith S, Deveridge A, Berman J, Negin J, Mwambene N, Chingaipe E, Ritchie LMP, Martiniuk A. Task-shifting and prioritization: a situational analysis examining the role and experiences of community health workers in Malawi. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(1):24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Limbani F, Thorogood M, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kabudula C, Goudge J. Task shifting to improve the provision of integrated chronic care: realist evaluation of a lay health worker intervention in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(1):e001084.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chamie G, Kwarisiima D, Clark TD, Kabami J, Jain V, Geng E, Petersen ML, Thirumurthy H, Kamya MR, Havlir DV. Leveraging rapid community-based HIV testing campaigns for non-communicable diseases in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Abiiro GA, Mbera GB, De Allegri M. Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: a qualitative study in rural communities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all study participants, health facility staff, health managers and implementing partners working in Phalombe District for their participation in this research. We wish to thank Dadirai Khambadza for her support with data collection related to this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the European Commission, through the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Fellowship, Specific Grant Agreement 2015–1595, awarded to VA (Vibian Angwenyi). JVL is supported by a Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities Miguel Servet grant (Instituto de Salud Carlos III/ESF, European Union [CP18/00074]) and further acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Programme (CEX2018–000806-S), and from the Government of Catalonia through the CERCA Programme. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VA and CA conceptualised the study. VA conducted the investigations and analysed the data under supervision of CA. VA wrote the first draft, with JVL providing critical feedback to the manuscript structure. JVL, CA, JB-A and BC reviewed the full draft and suggested important revisions to the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibian Angwenyi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam-Netherlands (EMGO+; WC2015–080, 27-Oct-2015), and the National Committee on Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Malawi (P.11/15/64, 10-Dec-2015). All eligible participants approached for interviews provided informed written consent, and verbal informed consent obtained to conduct observations and meetings related to the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Interview topic guides.

Additional file 2.

COREQ checklist.

Additional file 3.

Health facility structured observation guide.

Additional file 4.

Additional quotes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angwenyi, V., Aantjes, C., Bunders-Aelen, J. et al. Context matters: a qualitative study of the practicalities and dilemmas of delivering integrated chronic care within primary and secondary care settings in a rural Malawian district. BMC Fam Pract 21, 101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01174-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Integrated care
  • Malawi
  • Non-communicable diseases
  • Primary healthcare
  • Qualitative study
  • Sub-Saharan Africa