Skip to main content

Table 2 The association between patient’s travel distance to first specialised diagnostic facility and the probability of the GP using “wait-and-see”, “medical treatment” and “referral the same day”(i.e. the diagnostic strategy of the GP) stratified on whether the GP suspected cancer or serious illness or not

From: Patient’s travel distance to specialised cancer diagnostics and the association with the general practitioner’s diagnostic strategy and satisfaction with the access to diagnostic procedures: an observational study in Denmark

 

Wait-and-seeb

Medical treatmentb

Referred the same dayb

GP did suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 2013)

GP did not suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 1084)

GP did suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 2013)

GP did not suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 1084)

GP did suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 2013)

GP did not suspect cancer or serious illness

(n = 1084)

 

PRadj (95%CI)

PRadj (95%CI)

PR adj (95%CI)

PRadj (95%CI)

PRadj (95%CI)

PRadj (95%CI)

Distancea(km)

 0–6

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

1 (ref.)

  > 6–18

0.95 (0.45–1.91)

1.48 (1.08–2.04)

0.92 (0.51–1.64)

1.25 (0.91–1.72)

0.97 (0.90–1.04)

0.82 (0.63–1.08)

  > 18–34

0.84 (0.42–1.67)

1.15 (0.82–1.61)

0.88 (0.47–1.58)

1.45 (1.05–1.99)

0.99 (0.92–1.06)

0.84 (0.64–1.12)

  > 34–49

0.44 (0.16–1.19)

1.19 (0.84–1.70)

1.09 (0.58–2.04)

1.29 (0.89–1.87)

1.04 (0.97–1.12)

0.86 (0.62–1.19)

  > 49

1.21 (0.52–2.79)

1.21 (0.81–1.82)

1.05 (0.50–2.21)

1.29 (0.88–1.91)

1.01 (0.92–1.11)

1.07 (0.78–1.46)

  1. Analysis were based on 3097 patients, due to missing responses regarding GP’s suspicion of cancer
  2. aTravel distance from the residence of the patient to the first specialised facility
  3. bAdjusted for sex, age (continuous), education, marital status and cancer type