Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceptions about pay-for-performance programs of surveyed family physicians that may affect participation willingness*

From: Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study

Items

Participants (n = 266)a

N (%)

Non-participants (n = 277)a

N (%)

P value

P4P programs help enhance healthcare quality

Agree

215 (80.8)

177 (64.1)

< 0.001*

Neutral or no opinion

37 (13.9)

70 (25.4)

Disagree

14 (05.3)

29 (10.5)

P4P programs help reduce NHI expenditure

Agree

168 (63.4)

140 (50.7)

0.002*

Neutral or no opinion

75 (28.3)

88 (31.9)

Disagree

22 (8.3)

48 (17.4)

P4P programs helps increase income.

Agree

111 (42.0)

96 (34.9)

0.08

Neutral or no opinion

109 (41.3)

114 (41.5)

Disagree

44 (16.7)

65 (23.6)

P4P programs help decrease the dependence of fee-for-service model on quantity of care, thereby improving physicians’ quality of life

Agree

134 (51.0)

125 (45.6)

0.44

Neutral or no opinion

89 (33.8)

100 (36.5)

Disagree

40 (15.2)

49 (17.9)

It is not easy for P4P programs to demonstrate the healthcare quality they claims to improve

Agree

86 (33.0)

118 (42.9)

< 0.001*

Neutral or no opinion

101 (38.7)

118 (42.9)

Disagree

74 (28.4)

39 (14.2)

Participation in P4P programs involves steep financial risk

Agree

81 (31.2)

93 (33.8)

< 0.001*

Neutral or no opinion

103 (39.6)

136 (49.5)

Disagree

76 (29.2)

46 (16.7)

Participation in P4P programs increases workload

Agree

206 (79.2)

218 (79.6)

0.19

Neutral or no opinion

35 (13.5)

45 (16.4)

Disagree

19(7.3)

11(4.0)

It is not an easy task understanding P4P programs

Agree

160 (61.8)

173 (62.9)

0.004*

Neutral or no opinion

63 (24.3)

86 (31.3)

Disagree

36 (13.9)

16(5.8)

Participation in P4P programs may increase the risk of medical disputes

Agree

35 (13.5)

63 (22.9)

< 0.001*

Neutral or no opinion

101 (38.8)

143 (52.0)

Disagree

124 (47.7)

69 (25.1)

Current reward incentives and quality and other related indicators are not satisfying enough to induce my P4P participation willingness

Agree

102 (39.4)

133 (48.7)

0.003*

Neutral or no opinion

107 (41.3)

114 (41.8)

Disagree

50 (19.3)

26(9.5)

  1. P4P Pay for performance
  2. aSome data are missing
  3. *pay-for-performance participants vs. non-participants