Skip to main content

Table 1 Variables and instruments used in the study

From: Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams

Blocks of variables

Variables

Instruments

1) Independent variables (IV):

 Individual Characteristics

1

Age

Research team socio-demographic questionnaire.

2

Gender

Research team socio-demographic questionnaire.

3

Belief in the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration

Instrument designed by Sicotte et al. (2002) [1], composed of five items; 5 likert scale; Cronbach alpha (α): 0.92; (Original version in French).

Global internal consistency of the version for this study; 7 likert-scale; α: 0.92.

4

Seniority in the team

Research team socio-demographic questionnaire.

 Interactional Characteristics

5

Knowledge sharing (intention to share knowledge)

Instrument designed by Bock, Zmud, Kim and Lee (2005) [2], composed of five items;. 5 likert scales; α: 0.93; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version: N.A.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale: α:0.86.

6

Knowledge integration

Instrument designed by Song and Xies (2000) [3], composed of nine items; 11 likert-scale; α: N.A.; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French Version: N.A.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; α:0.95.

7

Affective commitment toward the team

Instrument designed by Allen and Meyer (1990) [4], composed of four items; 7 likert-scale; α: 0.86–0.92; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French Version: N.A.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; α:0.91.

8

Participation in decision-making

Instrument designed by Campion, Medsker and Higgs (1993) [5], composed of three items; 5 likert-scale;. α: 0.88; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version [6]; α: 0.80.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; α:0.90.

9

Mutual trust

Instrument designed by Simons and Peterson (2000) [7], composed of four items;5 likert-scale; α: 0.89. (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version [8];α:0.90.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; α:0.92.

10

Team climate

Instrument designed by Anderson and West (1998) [9], composed of nineteen items (4 dimensions); 5 likert-scale α: 0.84–0.92; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the First french version [10];: 0.88–0.93.

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; (sum of the 4 dimensions) α: 0.84–0.93.

11

Team conflict

Instrument designed by Jehn and Mannix (1991) [11], composed of nine-items (3 dimensions); 5 likert-scale; α: 0.93–0.94; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version [6]: α: 0.75–0.93

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study; 7-likert scale; (sum of the 4 dimensions) α: 0.84–0.91.

12

Team autonomy

Instrument designed by Campion, Medsker and Higgs (1993) [5], composed of three-items; 5 likert-scale; α: 0.76; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version [6]: α: 0.67

Global internal consistency of the French version for this study: 7-likert scale; α:0.81.

 Structural Characteristics

13

Organizational support

Instrument designed by Spreitzer (1996) [12], composed of four-items. α: N.A.; (Original version).

Global internal consistency of the first French version [13]; α::0.85

French version for this study; 7-likert scale: α:0.84.

14

Team size

Research team socio-demographic questionnaire.

 Professional Role Characteristics

15

Type of profession

Research team socio-demographic questionnaire.

16

Multifocal identification

Instrument designed by Christ, Van Dick, Wagner, and Stellmacher (2003) [14], composed of 7 items;. 6 likert-scale; Cronbach alpha (α): 0.79; (Original version)

Global internal consistency of the first French version [15]; α::0.69

French version for this study; 7—likert-scale: α:N.A.

 2) Dependent variable (DV):

 

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC)

Instrument designed by Chiocchio, Grenier, O’Neil, Savaria and Willms (2012) [16], composed of a fourteen-items in four sub-dimensions: communication (5 items); synchronization (3 items), explicit coordination (3 items); implicit coordination (3 items); 7 likert-scale; α: 0.91–0.92; (Original version in French).

Global internal consistency of the version for this study α:0.94: