Skip to main content

Table 3 OSCE results on proficiency, systematic and completeness

From: An educational study to investigate the efficacy of three training methods for infiltration techniques on self-efficacy and skills of trainees in general practice

 

pre

post

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

m

SD

m

SD

m

SD

m

SD

m

SD

m

SD

proficiency

 gleno-humeral

4,3

±1.7

4,5

±2.0

3,4

±2.0

7.3

±0.8

8.3

±0.9

9.2

±1.0

 sub-acromial

4.4

±2.3

3.7

±2.6

3.6

±1.3

7.2

±0.7

8.2

±0.7

9.1

±0.9

 lateral epic.

4.7

±1.4

3.3

±1.4

3.3

±1.7

7.6

±0.8

7.7

±1.0

9.1

±0.9

 carpal tunnel

3.8

±1.4

4.1

±1.7

5.2

±1.8

7.2

±0.9

8.0

±1.0

8.4

±0.7

 knee LA

4.9

±1.8

5.1

±1.7

3.9

±2.5

7.7

±0.8

7.8

±0.9

7.8

±0.8

 knee AA

3.3

±2.0

3.6

±2.6

2.5

±3.1

7.4

±0.9

8.1

±0.9

7.7

±0.8

systematics

 gleno-humeral

4,3

±1.8

4,5

±2.1

3,7

±2.0

7.5

±0.9

8.4

±0.8

9.4

±0.7

 sub-acromial

4.5

±2.4

3.6

±2.8

3.9

±1.1

7.5

±0.7

8.3

±0.7

9.5

±0.7

 lateral epic.

5.4

±1.1

4.2

±1.9

3.5

±1.8

7.6

±0.9

8.3

±0.7

9.5

±0.7

 carpal tunnel

4.3

±1.5

4.8

±1.4

5.3

±1.8

7.8

±0.6

8.2

±0.8

8.5

±0.5

 knee LA

5.0

±1.8

5.4

±1.6

3.6

±2.5

7.7

±0.7

8.1

±0.7

8.1

±0.5

 knee AA

3.4

±2.2

3.7

±2.8

2.3

±3.0

7.7

±0.6

8.3

±0.7

8.0

±0.6

completeness

 gleno-humeral

4,2

±0.8

4,4

±2.3

3,8

±2.1

8.0

±0.8

8.4

±0.6

9.5

±0.7

 sub-acromial

4.7

±2.4

3.6

±2.8

4.1

±1.3

8.0

±0.8

8.4

±0.7

9.5

±0.7

 lateral epic.

5.2

±1.2

4.3

±1.8

3.7

±1.9

8.0

±1.0

8.4

±0.6

9.5

±0.7

 carpal tunnel

4.2

±1.6

4.8

±1.5

5.2

±1.7

7.8

±0.6

8.3

±0.7

8.3

±0.6

 knee LA

4.7

±1.9

5.3

±1.8

4.1

±2.7

8.1

±0.5

8.3

±0.7

8.1

±0.7

 knee AA

3.3

±2.2

3.7

±2.9

2.5

±3.3

7.8

±0.6

8.4

±0.8

8.3

±0.6

  1. Results are given as median (m) and standard deviation (SD)
  2. pre = value before training, post = value immediately after training
  3. G1 group 1: only theoretical lecture, G2 group 2: theoretical lecture + anatomic models, G3 group 3: theoretic lecture + cadavers
  4. Knee AA anterior approach, LA lateral approach
  5. Scores in bold: scores post training are significantly higher than before training (p ≤ 0,05)
  6. Scores in italic: scores (G2 & G3) are significantly higher than after theoretical lecture (G1) (p ≤ 0,05)
  7. Scores with a full underline: Scores (G3) are significantly higher than after lecture + training on anatomical models (G2) (p ≤ 0,05)