Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression to evaluate the use of diagnostic methods for acute otitis media in children

From: Diagnostic methods for acute otitis media in 1 to 12 year old children: a cross sectional study in primary health care

 

Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI; p-value)

Adjusted odds ratio1 (95% CI; p-value)

Pneumatic otoscopy

 GP (ST is reference)

2.4 (0.99–5.9; p = 0.052)

2.1 (0.83–5.4; p = 0.12)

 Female gender

0.52 (0.22–1.2; p = 0.14)

0.64 (0.26–1.6; p = 0.34)

Otomicroscopy

 GP (ST is reference)

4.0 (1.3–12; p = 0.017)

4.9 (1.5–17; p = 0.011)

 Female gender

1.1 (0.36–3.3; p = 0.88)

1.9 (0.54–6.4; p = 0.33)

Tympanometry

 GP (ST is reference)

0.83 (0.36–1.9; p = 0.66)

0.90 (0.37–2.2; p = 0.82)

 Female gender

1.3 (0.59–3.0; p = 0.50)

1.3 (0.54–3.0; p = 0.58)

Combination2

 GP (ST is reference)

1.1 (0.47–2.5; p = 0.83)

1.3 (0.54–3.2; p = 0.54)

 Female gender

1.7 (0.74–3.7; p = 0.22)

1.8 (0.77–4.2; p = 0.18)

  1. 1 The use of diagnostic methods in 1 to 12 year old children consulting primary health care was dichotomised in two categories, never using (0) or seldom to always using (1) the method, adjusted for general practitioners (GPs) versus specialist trainees in primary care (STs) and their sex
  2. 2 Combination of pneumatic otoscopy/otomicroscopy and tympanometry
  3. Statistically significant findings are bold