- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A global picture of family medicine: the view from a WONCA Storybooth
BMC Family Practice volume 20, Article number: 129 (2019)
Family Medicine is a novel discipline in many countries, where the motivation for training and value added to communities is not well-described. Our purpose was to understand the reason behind the choice of Family Medicine as a profession, the impact of Family Medicine on communities, and Family Medicine’s characterizing qualities, as perceived by family doctors around the world.
One-question video interviews were conducted using an appreciative inquiry approach, with volunteer participants at the 2016 World Organization of Family Doctors conference in Rio de Janeiro. Qualitative data analysis applied the thematic, framework method.
135 family doctors from 55 countries participated in this study. Three overarching themes emerged: 1) key attributes of Family Medicine, 2) core Family Medicine values and 3) shared traits of family doctors. Family Medicine attributes and values were the key expressed motivators to join Family Medicine as a profession and were also among expressed factors that contributed to the impact of Family Medicine globally. Major sub-themes included the principles of comprehensive care, holistic care, continuity of care, patient centeredness, and the patient-provider relationship. Participants emphasized the importance of universal care, human rights, social justice and health equity.
Family doctors around the world shared stories about their profession, presenting a heterogeneous picture of global Family Medicine unified by its attributes and values. These stories may inspire and serve as positive examples for Family Medicine programs, prospective students, advocates and other stakeholders.
Family Medicine (FM) is an academic and clinical discipline focused on the provision of continuous, comprehensive, coordinated and contextualized primary health care (PHC) for individuals, families and communities. FM considers biological, psychological, socio-economic, cultural and spiritual parameters and is not limited by age, gender, organ, system or disease. It incorporates prevention and health education within clinical care [1, 2]. Studies suggest that countries with strong PHC have more cost-effective healthcare systems, reduced health inequalities, and ultimately healthier populations [3, 4].
Many organizations support FM globally. These include the World Health Organisation (WHO), which emphasizes PHC as the pillar of the health system, and the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA), which aims to improve quality of life of the peoples of the world through promoting the values of FM . The College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Besrour Centre also advances FM worldwide in its role as an international centre of collaboration between FM partners . FM is relatively a new discipline in many countries and despite the high level support, it continues to present a wide spectrum of ground level challenges related to the variations in its scope and the heterogeneity in its practice within different global contexts [7, 8] .
The purpose of this study was to explore common perceptions and beliefs held by family doctors worldwide about their profession. By using an opportunistic approach to capturing their narratives, we hoped to identify their motivations and professional experiences, which would inform common strategies to advance FM globally. Such strategies may include student recruitment, engagement with institutions and non-FM peers, as well as engendering pride among FM colleagues. Through aggregation of these experiences, we organized this myriad of expressions into a descriptive narrative summary about the collective future of the discipline and the patients it serves.
The following study questions guided this exploration:
What motivates family physicians to join FM?
What is the impact of FM as perceived by family physicians?
What traits do family physicians around the world share?
A lack of previous studies examining the feelings global family doctors have about their discipline led us to choose an exploratory qualitative approach that used data generated through short personal interviews of participants at an international conference. This approach allowed insight into participants’ perceived experience of FM in an unscripted and spontaneous manner. Seven international volunteer members of the Besrour Centre’s Narrative Working Group conducted the interviews. Four of the seven interviewers also contributed to transcription and data analysis.
The study population was a convenience and snowball sample of family doctors participating in the 21st WONCA World Conference of Family Doctors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (November 2nd-6th, 2016). This event was purposefully chosen as it provided an international and heterogeneous cluster of informants. We included family doctors regardless of their current position and function. We only included those who speak English, French, Portuguese or Spanish and who consented and had time for a short video interview.
Data was purposefully collected from conference attendees, who were approached in person and invited to participate. Seven researchers performed the interviews using a standardised process:
Participants were given a brief explanation of the project and asked to sign an informed consent form.
Participants were asked to select and provide an answer 2–3 min in length to one of three questions from a provided instructions ‘menu’ (in English, French, Portuguese or Spanish) (see Fig. 1.).
Responses were video recorded in participants’ preferred language.
Participants were invited to attend a session presenting the project’s preliminary findings on the last day of the conference (see Fig. 2.).
The authors transcribed these recordings verbatim; all non-English transcriptions (in French, Spanish and Portuguese) were translated into English (See Additional file 1). All transcripts were also validated against the digital video recordings.
We applied a thematic, framework method  to our analysis coupled to an appreciative inquiry approach . Seven researchers each reviewed 50–100% of the interviews each. They familiarised themselves with the material and generated individual codebooks by identifying major and minor themes from the transcripts. Two researchers (VCK and CG) discussed the seven codebooks and developed a master codebook that categorised emerging themes in main themes and subthemes. The master codebook was then reviewed by all researchers until consensus was achieved. Using MaxQDA qualitative data analysis software8, one researcher (VCK) systematically coded the text from all transcripts according to the master codebook and the study questions. This process facilitated the evaluation of connections between the emerging themes. Finally, the entire research team reviewed and attained consensus regarding the key findings.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional review board of the University of Calgary (ID REB17–0185). Participation was voluntary and a consent form was provided and signed by each participant.
One hundred and thirty-five family doctors from 55 countries participated in this study. 84 were male and 51 were female. All the continents were represented, except Antarctica (Fig. 3).
Three overarching themes emerged from the material.
Key attributes of FM: what characterises the practice.
Core FM values: what practitioners value about their role.
Shared traits of family doctors: what characterises the practitioners.
Illustrative quotes are presented in Table 1.
Key attributes of FM
FM was often presented as an evolving profession, providing a solution to common health problems and health system issues. Participants identified a number of key attributes of FM, including: comprehensive care, holistic care, patient-centred care, proximity with people and continuity of care. Many participants reported the provision of holistic care beyond the symptoms of a disease as a core principle of FM, taking into account mental and social factors as well as social determinants of health. This approach was attractive to many participants and influenced their choice to become family physicians (Quotes 1–3). Prevention and health promotion were also often highlighted as important in the practice of FM (Quotes 4, 5).
Participants recognized that FM provides comprehensive undifferentiated care to help all people (Quotes 6,7). Other participants declared that they joined FM because they believed in universal health care, in the reduction of health inequity and the promotion of social justice, particularly for underserved populations (Quotes 8,9).
Some participants described that family doctors are more connected and involved in the communities they live in than other physicians (Quotes 14,15). Continuity of care and helping patients through their illness journey were also considered attractive attributes of FM (Quotes 18, 19).
Core FM values
Interviewed participants also focused on values that motivated them to join FM, shaped their attitudes, and guided their practice. These included empathy and compassion, sharing stories and human touch, enquiry and reflexion, accountability, team spirit, mutual respect, and preference for marginalised populations. Further values included the passion that drives family doctors to serve humanity and to build relationships that generate patient and provider satisfaction (Quote 24).
Many family doctors were enthusiastic about FM as a philosophy and practice, were passionate about their patients, and were ready to bring change and respond to the patient’s health needs (Quotes 25,26). They also valued listening to and sharing people’s stories, and advocating through these stories (Quote 28). They valued enquiry, curiosity, reflection and the variety of challenging situations that they deal with in their daily practice (Quotes 40, 41). Some participants thought that happiness and fun were important when doing their work, helping them to cope with the challenges they encounter (Quote 38). Many participants expressed their satisfaction with FM and some noted it provided a good work/life balance (Quotes 39–41).
Shared traits of family doctors
The participants identified a number of shared traits: presenting themselves as generalist clinicians, helpers, facilitators, servants, advisers, friends, communicators, teachers, mentors, leaders, advocates, researchers, and scientists with multiple and different practice environments that require a high level of adaptability. They reported that they have a wide scope of practice (Quote 42, 44, 45). They also noted that they were prepared to be leaders who would be ready to influence people, communities and policy on health-related issues (Quote 47).
This study captured family doctors’ perceptions of their motivation to pursue a FM career, the impact of FM on communities and other shared traits of family doctors. FM attributes and values were often articulated around the concepts and principles of comprehensive care, holistic care, continuity of care, patient centeredness, strong patient-provider relationship and proximity with people. These concepts and principles were shared in varying degrees, depending on home region and the current state of FM development in their context. The examination of the narratives in Table 1 reveals that participants from countries where FM was well established tended to describe the direct impact of FM attributes and values while participants from countries where FM was relatively new were more hypothetical and tended to talk in term of wishes and aspirations . We believe this difference in the narrative is part of the natural history of FM programs. Participants also emphasized universal care, human rights, social justice and health equity as important drivers of FM practice, as reported in another study .
FM attributes and values influence decisions around pursuing a career in FM. It has been shown that continuity of care as well as the broad scope of both pathology and patients, are some of the main motivators to join a FM career [11,12,13]. Studies show that early interest, personal experience of FM practice, positive mentors, a good work-life balance and communication influence the choice of FM career [11,12,13,14,15,16]. It has been reported that students who choose to join FM training programs are attracted by the unique patient-provider relationship and that income and prestige are not their first priority [14, 17, 18]. In other studies; variety, continuity of care and work–life balance were the top three reasons behind choosing FM as a career , with social dimensions of medicine, continuity of care and the satisfaction of successfully dealing with minor illnesses, being also elements of FM that particularly attract family doctors . Perceptions from our participants were well aligned with these findings from previous studies, often done in high-income settings. However, it would be too simplistic to present the above motivators as the sole determinants of FM career choice. Indeed, the processes through which medical students choose a training programme are complex and depend on multiple personal and societal issues [11, 21]. Physician career choice is often determined by the balance between career preferences, the availability of training posts and career opportunities .
FM has been described as a challenging yet rewarding job and this was also reported by participants . Physicians who develop careers in FM likely do so for reasons other than income and status . As found in our study, family doctors are satisfied with their jobs due to the intrinsic qualities of their work, and work values seem to influence their job satisfaction.  A similar link has already been suggested in the literature; ‘because career commitment depends more on values than on any other factor, such as interests, abilities, and personality, values may be a more valid and reliable predictor of job satisfaction’ . Therefore a focus on job satisfaction via factors that attract and retain family doctors may help future FM recruitment, practice and retention .
The field of FM continues to evolve around the world. For instance, in Ghana, FM is a relatively new speciality and the main reason of not choosing it is the lack of understanding among medical students . Where FM is well established it is sometime overshadowed by more prestigious and lucrative specialities that tend to be favoured by academic, healthcare and social contexts [11, 12, 18]. In one study, students recognized that they are not exposed to FM during their training and therefore had little idea of what is involved in being a family doctor . These are among the reasons why medical students may hesitate to become family doctors, making recruitment in FM difficult  and contributing to the scarcity of family doctors in many countries [17, 21, 28]. This consequently limits the development of primary health care systems . Emphasizing the motivators to practice FM, as highlighted in this study, may attract, nurture and retain potential candidates with a predilection for FM. Indeed, engaging students early in their choice of career and increasing the presence of FM mentors might encourage interest in FM by improving students’ perception of FM as a career option and decrease the misperceptions that may negatively influence FM career decisions [14, 21, 30].
This exploratory study shows that family doctors around the world share attributes and core values of their profession. Further, the study shows that perceived FM traits, competencies and tasks tend to be diverse, and are often physician and context dependent. The results suggests that family doctors from different countries have a similar understanding of their discipline and of their careers as found in previous research . Considering that FM is at different stages of development in the world, a question might be how FM attributes and core values are applied and achieved across regions. Also, as it has been already pointed out, we may ask again if these attributes and values really ‘bind family doctors together’ . Future studies may help to answer these questions.
Practice and research implication
Our findings may be used to advance and positively influence the global discourse on FM. The knowledge may help in guiding recruitment strategies and in accelerating professional identity formation for future family doctors. In-depth exploration of each of the highlighted motivators, values and success stories may help to deepen the understanding of FM on a global scale and find ways to attract those who will enjoy and sustain a FM career . The identified themes may also be used for advocacy purposes especially in regions where FM is emergent.
Our findings should be considered in light of several limitations. This study is based on interviews from a convenience sampling of family doctors attending an international conference on FM. This entails a selection bias in our sample of family doctors who were probably enthusiastic about their profession, which may not represent the common view among family doctors and therefore we cannot claim saturation. Given that a visual capture of diversity was part of the desired outcome, we only included participants who agreed to use the photos and videos as part of our protocol. This may also have introduced a selection bias.
The majority of respondents were men (62%), which may affect the results. Since FM (and especially leaders who may be invited to a global conference) is still dominated by men in many parts of the world, these results can still reflect a real perception of the discipline. Participants were not asked for any other personal demographic data such as age, years of experience, etc., as we wanted to maximize the limited time available for interviews. This may have limited our interpretation of the data.
We used an appreciative enquiry approach with a focus on enabling factors in FM, which highlighted positive aspects of the discipline. However, this choice may have masked the existing tension about global FM described in the literature [7, 33].
The one-question interview approach may appear awkward for a qualitative exploration. Non-structured in-depth interviews with multiple prepared open-ended questions and spontaneous probes may have generated a richer dataset. However, as we expected participants at the conference to have a busy agenda, we anticipated this approach would not generate an adequate sample size. We therefore used the one-question interview approach and compensated its limitations by gathering a large and heterogeneous sample. Translation may be considered as a limitation. To minimize the risk of distortion of information translation and transcription was done by native speakers who are also fluent in English.
Of the three menu questions, the question about the impact of FM was rarely selected. Few studies have investigated this question and some have had counter-intuitive findings . The study design did not allow us to influence choice of the question from the menu, so the relative lack of response to one of the queries could not be addressed. However, as all responses were coded for the same themes, we do not expect this to have a significant impact on our results.
Finally, as only two participants reviewed the findings, we cannot ensure their full internal validity.
Family doctors from around the world shared stories and thoughts about their profession. We believe the main benefit of this study is the identification of attributes and values family doctors consider as important motivators in choosing their profession. These success stories may inspire and serve as role modelling for burgeoning FM programs. They may also help to design recruitment strategies, by focusing on factors that influence the choice of FM as a career. Expressed commonalities may foster the spirit of unity of global FM and boost common endeavours in improving global health through FM.
Availability of data and materials
Transcripts of all interviews are available as additional supporting files.
Primary Health Care
World Health Organisation
World Organization of Family Doctors
McWhinney I. Family medicine in perspective. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:176–81.
Kidd M. The contribution of family medicine to improving health systems: a guidebook from the world Organization of Family Doctors. 2nd ed. London: Radcliffe; 2013.
World Health Organization, WHO, World Health Organization. Primary Health Care Now More Than Ever. World Heal Rep. 2008;996(10):148 Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83:457–502.
Global Family Doctor - WONCA Online [Internet]. [cited 2017 Dec 19]. Available from: http://www.globalfamilydoctor.com.
Rouleau K, Ponka D, Arya N, Couturier F, Siedlecki B, Redwood-campbell L, et al. The Besrour Conferences. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61:578–81.
Arya N, Gibson C, Ponka D, Haq C, Hansel S, Dahlman B, et al. Family medicine around the world: overview by region: the Besrour papers: a series on the state of family medicine in the world. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(6):436–41.
Arya N, Dahlman B, Gibson C, Ponka D, Haq C, Rouleau K, et al. Developing family practice to respond to global health challenges. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(8):602 LP–606 Available from: http://www.cfp.ca/content/63/8/602.abstract.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy Reasearch. The qualitative researcher’s companion; 2002. p. 305–29. Available from: http://books.google.es/books?id=46jfwR6y5joC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q&f=false
Cooperrider DL, Sorensen PF Jr, Whitney D, Yaegar TF. Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change. Team Performanc Manag An Int J. 2000;6(7/8):140.
Rodríguez C, Tellier PP, Bélanger E. Exploring professional identification and reputation of family medicine among medical students: a Canadian case study. Educ Prim Care. 2012;23(3):158–68.
Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Stamm M. Family physicians in Switzerland: transition from residency to family practice. Fam Med. 2011;43(1):29–36.
Watson J, Humphrey A, Peters-klimm F, Hamilton W. Motivation and satisfaction in GP training : 2011;(October):645–649.
Osborn HA, Frcsc KF, Brandt MG, Doyle PC. Primary care specialty career choice among Canadian medical students understanding the factors that in fl uence their decisions Recherche Le choix d ’ Une carrière en médecine de première ligne chez les étudiants en médecine canadiens Comprendre les facte, vol. 63; 2017. p. 107–13.
Roos M, Watson J, Wensing M, Peters-Klimm F. Motivation for career choice and job satisfaction of GP trainees and newly qualified GPs across Europe: a seven countries cross-sectional survey. Educ Prim Care. 2014;25(4):202–10.
Maiorova T, Stevens F, Van Der ZJ, Boode B, Scherpbier A. Shortage in general practice despite the feminisation of the medical workforce: a seeming paradox? A cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:1–8.
Kiolbassa K, Miksch A, Hermann K, Loh A, Szecsenyi J, Joos S, et al. Becoming a general practitioner - which factors have most impact on career choice of medical students? BMC fam Pract. BioMed Central Ltd. 2011;12(1):25 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/12/25.
Bouwkamp-Memmer JC, Whiston SC, Hartung PJ. Work values and job satisfaction of family physicians. J Vocat Behav. 2013;82(3):248–55. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.001.
Irish B, Lake J. When and why do doctors decide to become general practitioners? Implications for recruitment into UK general practice specialty training. Educ Prim Care. 2011;22(1):20–4.
Lambert T, Goldacre R, Smith F, Goldacre MJ. Reasons why doctors choose or reject careers in general practice: national surveys. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(605):851–8.
Bunker J, Shadbolt N. Choosing general practice as a career: the influences of education and training. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38(5):341–4.
Manca DP, Varnhagen S, Brett-MacLean P, Allan GM, Szafran O, Ausford A, et al. Rewards and challenges of family practice: Web-based survey using the Delphi method. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(2):278–86 277. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1949127&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
Walker KA, Pirotta M. What keeps Melbourne gps satisfied in their jobs? Aust Fam Physician. 2007;36(10):877–80.
Rounds JB. The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults. J Vocat Behav. 1990;37(1):32–45.
Le Floch B, Bastiaens H, Le Reste JY, Lingner H, Hoffman RD, Czachowski S, et al. Which positive factors determine the GP satisfaction in clinical practice? A systematic literature review. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0524-x.
Essuman A, Krueger A, Ndanu TA. Perceptions of medical students on family medicine in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2013;47(4):178–84.
López-Roig S, Pastor MÁ, Rodríguez C. The reputation and professional identity of family medicine practice according to medical students: a Spanish case study. Atención Primaria. 2010;42(12):591–601.
Scott I, Wright B, Brenneis F, Brett-MacLean P, McCaffrey L. Why would I choose a career in family medicine? Reflections of medical students at 3 universities. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(11):1956–7.
Elkhawaga G, Bernard B. House officers ’ attitude towards family medicine and its choice as a career in Egypt. Fam Pract. 2015;32(2):198–204.
Kawamoto R, Ninomiya D, Kasai Y, et al. Factors associated with the choice of general medicine as a career among Japanese medical students. Med Educ Online. 2016;21:29448. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29448
Beaulieu M-D, Dory V, Pestiaux D, Pouchain D, Rioux M, Rocher G, et al. What does it mean to be a family physician?: exploratory study with family medicine residents from 3 countries. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(8):e14–20 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2726108&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
Ponka D. The Besrour Papers: Seeking evidence for family medicine. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2017;9(1):a1559. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1559
Stein HF. Family medicine’s identity: being generalists in a specialist culture? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(5):455–9.
von Pressentin KB, Mash RJ, Baldwin-Ragaven L, Botha RPG, Govender I, Steinberg WJ, et al. The influence of family physicians within the south African District health system: a cross-sectional study. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2133.
Generous support has come through Dr. Sadok Besrour’s Besrour Centre within the College of Family Physicians of Canada, its Director Dr. Katherine Rouleau and staff Vera Shewell and Ophelia Michaelides. Enthusiastic assistance in interviews from Dr. Ying (Eliza) Chan, Dr. Catherine Ji, Dr. Stephen Cashman. Translation / transcription support additionally came from Dr. Stephen Cashman (English), Dr. Catherine Ji (French), Dr. Adelson Guaraci Jantsch (Portuguese), and Dr. Maria Florencia Mendiondo (Spanish). Special thanks to Drs. Michael Schriver, David Ponka, and Per Kallestrup for manuscript review. And most special thanks to Professor Bob Woollard, who joins us on the Narrative Working Group of the Besrour Centre, for his guidance and profound understanding of Family Medicine.
No funding sources to declare. This study did not receive a grant.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional review board of the University of Calgary (ID REB17–0185). Participation was voluntary and a consent form was provided and signed by each participant.
Consent for publication
All participants consented to the use and publication of the collected material, including video, images and transcripts. In addition, participants provided written consent for the use of their personal data.
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare. Certain authors had financial support to attend WONCA conference in Brazil: College of Family Physicians of Canada (VKC, BA, MWB, and CG), Aarhus University and WONCA (VKC), Memorial University of Newfoundland (RD), and University of Manitoba (CD).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.