Skip to main content

Advertisement

Factors affecting the work competency and stability of family doctors in Shanghai: a tracking study

Article metrics

Abstract

Background

Family doctors can fulfill the gatekeeper duty to protect the residents’ health, which depends on their work competency and stability. The study aimed to identify factors influencing work competency and stability among Shanghai family doctors.

Methods

This study was a 2-year follow-up survey (2013/2016). A representative sample of 146 family doctors in Shanghai community health service centers was interviewed in 2013. The tracked sample (n = 142) was resurveyed in 2016. A 50-item questionnaire organized into four parts, i.e., general demographic characteristics, working conditions, cognition about family doctor services, and job satisfaction was issued to all family doctors. Models for factors influencing family doctors’ work competency and stability were then established. The collected data were analyzed using ordinal regression methods and descriptive, factor, and multiple-factor analyses.

Results

The family doctors’ work competency model showed demographic characteristics (education level and job title), family doctors’ team, family doctors’ training, grasp of specific content regarding the family doctor system, and whether the family doctors’ ability was played and demonstrated were statistically significant at different levels (P < 0.05). The analysis of family doctors’ work stability showed that work competency (whether it was possible to provide residents with all contents specified in the contract service package, employment form, and support satisfaction) and work cognition (whether the daily work was meaningful and had value) had a significant impact on work stability (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Family doctors’ job satisfaction is a key factor affecting their work stability. Family doctors’ competency can also affect their job stability, and their work cognition may play a role in work competency and stability. This study provides evidence for strengthening the stability of the family doctor teams in Shanghai.

Background

The number of patients with chronic diseases is increasing as aging population accelerates. Services provided by family doctors play an important and active role in the provision of community health care services, particularly in the rational use of health resources and improvement of community residents’ health status [1,2,3]. In 1997, the Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Health Reform and Development first proposed the training of specialized general practitioners. In 2009, the Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Deepening the Reform of the Medical and Health System proposed the family doctor system as the working goal of community health services. In 2016, the State Council Medical Reform Office issued Opinions on Promoting Family Doctors’ Contracting Services, which marked the launch of the family doctor contracting service in China’s urban and rural primary health care service institutions. In 2018, Opinions of Regulations on Family Doctor Contracting Services Management was proposed to enhance the standardized management level of family doctors’ contracting services and promote the quality and efficiency of family doctors’ contracting services. China’s 13th Five-Year Plan clearly defines the key task of promoting family doctor contracting services under the premise of voluntarily registering residents to their clinical practices during the current 5-year period [4]. The construction of a family doctor system has passed through the theoretical systematic, and practical stages in China.

The family doctor contracting services, is based on the general practitioners and supported by the family doctor service team. By signing the contract, the general (clinical) doctors can establish a long-term and stable service relationship with the contracted families, to provide safe, convenient, effective, continuous, economical basic medical services and basic public health services for the contracted families and individuals. Shanghai was the first city to implement the family doctor contracting system in China as a basic component of Shanghai’s medical and health reform. In 2011, the family doctor contracting system was officially launched in Shanghai. In 2015, Shanghai launched a new round of comprehensive reform of the community health services by releasing the “1 + 1 + 1” medical institution contracting services (i.e., residents can voluntarily choose a family doctor from a community health service center, a secondary hospital, and a municipal hospital to sign their contracting services). As of 2018, 6.66 million people became contracted residents in Shanghai’s “1 + 1 + 1” medical institution portfolio, of whom 30% were permanent residents. On May 19, 2019, the 9th “World Family Doctor Day” carried out a series of publicity activities with the theme of “working with family doctors and building a healthy life together” to create a good social atmosphere that supporting contracting services and family doctors.

Family doctors are oriented towards their community’s needs and emphasize their practical availability to their community. In addition, family doctor contracting services are people-oriented and can meet the population’s health needs by providing continuous, comprehensive, and long-term services for families and communities. Various factors affect family doctors’ provision of services as contracted service providers, including: whether they are capable of contracting services, whether the services are attractive to the community residents, and whether there is any incentive policy for contracting services. Therefore, a family doctor’s work competency is crucial for integrating an individual’s knowledge, skills, judgments, and attitudes. Competency was first proposed by David McClelland in 1973 [5] and refers to the deep-seated characteristics of individuals who can distinguish between those who have outstanding achievements in a job and ordinary people, Competencies could include motivations, traits, self-images, attitudes or values, and any knowledge, cognitive, or behavioral skills in a fields that can be reliably measured or counted. Thus, competency can be used to significantly distinguish between good and general performance. The competency model is a competency structure that combines the outstanding competency requirements of specific positions. The foreign general practitioner competency model has been well established, such as the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Association of General Practitioners/Family Physicians (WONCA) proposes a general practitioner’s core competency model that includes the six core competencies: i.e., primary care management, people-centred care), specific problem solving skills, comprehensive approaches, community orientation, and holistic modelling. Domestic research on the competence of general practitioners in community health service institutions has been performed, mostly around professional knowledge, interpersonal relationships, professional ethics, communication skills and communication skills, and work enthusiasm [6,7,8,9]. Compared with studies in foreign countries, domestic competency studies were generally lacking in the current state of theoretical research.

Therefore, family doctors not only have the ability to provide community health services, but also need to be able to provide continuous service capabilities and high quality of service, which depends on the stability and enthusiasm of the general practitioner’s team. Studies have identified an “active” flow of doctors in primary health care institutions is “active” [10,11,12], which directly affects the provision of family doctors’ contracting services and the sustainable development of community health service centers.

However, the expansion of the family doctor contracting service exposed some problems in the health-care system. For example, general practitioners had some cognitive differences regarding service provision and were not satisfied with their payments, and the residents’ registration rate of residents was not high [13,14,15]. Based on the above, this study drew on the domestic and international general practitioners’ competency and stability model to identify factors affecting the work competency and stability of family doctors in community health service centers. Changes in influential factors were also tracked to provide a realistic basis for understanding how family doctors can fulfill their gatekeeper duty to protect their residents’ health as well as deepen the reform of community health-care services.

Methods

Literature review

The terms “community health service” “family doctor” “general practitioner” “competence” and “stability” were used as key search words. We searched the China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data, PubMed, and Elsevier databases. More than 200 relevant references were systematically searched to determine the research status and trends for family doctors’ work abilities and summarize the relevant survey indicators for the research group.

Expert advice

Eleven experts from universities, academic research institutions, administrative departments, and community health service centers were identified, and an expert centralized demonstration meeting was held. In combination with community health service reform and family doctor system construction, the research group designed a questionnaire was formulated by the research group. Based on the consultation results, this questionnaire was modified to enhance the importance, accessibility, and operability of the relevant survey indicators.

Questionnaire survey

This study involved a 2-year follow-up survey (2013/2016). The participants were all family doctors who passed their assessment and certification and provided contracted services in the community health service centers of Changning District and thus were eligible for enrollment in this study.

Changning District has been exploring family doctor services since 1997. So far, the family doctors system has experienced four versions of the upgrade. In the 3.0 version of family doctors system between 2010 and 2015 year, the family doctors were the main contracting body to providing contracting services, with the goal of graded medical treatment and health management. Furthermore, in the 4.0 version of family doctors system (since 2016 year), the contracting object expanded from the key residents to all residents, with the goal of improving service platform and capabilities. So we chose Changning District as the investigation site. This district was the pilot area for the family doctor system reform in Shanghai; thus, these family doctors better represented the reform results. The research team had a good working relationship with the Changning District community health centers; therefore, it was convenient to use these centers to facilitate the investigation and research.

Sample size and method

The research team obtained full coverage of the general practitioners who worked as family doctors in Changning District. The first investigation was conducted in December 2013. The follow-up survey of family doctors was conducted in August 2016. In total, 154 respondents met the requirements in the first-phase survey, and 152 completed questionnaires were valid. There were 143 respondents in the second-phase follow-up survey, with 142 valid questionnaires.

Based on the relevant domestic and foreign literature, we developed the “Family Doctor Questionnaire for Shanghai Community Family Doctors and Graded Medical Treatment System Assessment” as the survey instrument. The questionnaire was divided into four parts involving 50 items, such as basic personal information (7 items), work competency (15 items), family doctors’ perceptions (17 items), and job satisfaction (11 items) respectively.

A member of the research group was responsible for distributing and collecting the questionnaire, which was sent to community health center directors and used an anonymous self-reporting method. After eliminating invalid questionnaires, the data were entered using EpiData Software (v. 3.1; EpiData Software, Redwood City, CA, USA) following the parallel double-entry method.

Two methods for model construction were used in this study. The first model examined factors influencing family doctors’ work competency. The dependent variable was “whether it was possible to provide residents with all content specified in the contract service package.” Independent variables were demographic characteristics, family doctors’ qualification and job training, family doctors’ team configuration and relationships, and family doctors’ cognition including 15 items. The second model explored factors influencing family doctors’ work stability. The dependent variable was “if you have the opportunity, whether you will accept the work of second- and third-level hospitals”. The independent variables were demographic characteristics, family doctors’ cognition, work competency, and job satisfaction including 13 items.

Statistical analysis

The data were input using EpiData 3.1 software (v. 3.1). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (v. 19; IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS software (v. 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The analytical methods included ordinal regression methods, and descriptive (mean and standard deviation, or number and percentage), factor, and multiple-factor (repeated measurement model and others) analyses.

Results

Analysis of respondents’ demographic characteristics

In 2013, 146 family doctors were included in the survey; 64.38% were women, and 44.14% were aged 30–39 years. The most common education level was a bachelor’s degree, accounting for 73.97%. Most respondents (73.61%) held intermediate titles, and 47.18% had worked for ≥4 years. In 2016, 142 family doctors were included in the survey: 68.31% were women and 52.11% were aged 30–39 years. The most common education level was a bachelor’s degree(77.46%). Most respondents (83.57%) held intermediate titles, and 86.33% had worked for more than 4 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participating family doctors

Analysis of factors influencing family doctors’ work competency

The model of influential factors impacting family doctors’ work competency was based on “whether it was possible to provide residents with all content specified in the contract service package” as the dependent variable (the independent variables were: demographic characteristics, family doctors’ qualification and job training, family doctors’ team configuration and relationships, and family doctors’ cognition). In 2013, demographic characteristics (education, job title), family doctors’ team, family doctors’ training, grasp of specific contents of the family doctor system, and whether the family doctors’ ability was played and demonstrated were statistically significant at different levels (P < 0.05). In 2016, family doctors’ training and whether the family doctors’ ability was played and demonstrated were statistically significant at different levels (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Analysis of factors influencing family doctors’ work competency

Factor analysis of family doctors’ job satisfaction

This analysis classified items for family doctors’ job satisfaction items and extracted three common factors according to the standard of common factor greater than 1. The first factor was labeled “collaborative environment satisfaction” and included satisfaction with equipment condition, office conditions, medical technology system support, organizational management, administrative logistics support, title promotion, informationization, and superior hospital collaborative diagnosis and treatment. The second factor was labeled “income satisfaction” and included satisfaction with welfare, job value, income level, and income and dedication fairness. The third factor was labeled “support satisfaction” and included satisfaction with general practitioner team support, relationships with colleagues, community (neighborhood) support, and leadership quality and management ability (Table 3).

Table 3 Factor analysis of family doctors’ job satisfaction (rotation component matrix)

Analysis of factors influencing family doctors’ work stability

The model of factors affecting family doctors’ work stability was based on “if you have the opportunity, would you will accept the work of second- and third-level hospitals” as the dependent variable. The independent variables were demographic characteristics, family doctors’ cognition and competency, and family doctors’ job satisfaction. The 2013 analysis showed that employment form and satisfaction with support had a significant effects on work stability (P < 0.05). In 2016, “whether it was possible to provide residents with all contents specified in the contract service package” and work cognition (“whether daily work was meaningful and had value”) significantly impacted work stability (P < 0.05). (Table 4).

Table 4 Analysis of factors influencing family doctors’ work stability

Discussion

Chinese community health services in China are at the foundation and the Chinese medical health-care system [16]. As health-care managers for the residents in their community, family doctors are the main mechanism by which community health-care services [17,18,19]. The capability and level of family doctor services is central to the smooth provision of contract services, because family doctors have a good command of social medicine, preventive medicine, psychology, and other types of knowledge, as well as providing medical care services [20,21,22,23]. Therefore, the continuous improvement of family doctor service capabilities is central to the sustainable development of the family doctor responsibility system [24, 25]. After years of development, China has established a preliminary general medicine education and qualification access system, but there authoritative and scientific evaluation and assessment standards for family doctors are lacking. The absence leads to unclear goals for family doctors and uneven distribution of doctors in communities.

WONCA’s core competency model is relatively mature [26,27,28] and includes primary healthcare, people-centered care, problem-solving skills, comprehensive processing, community-oriented care, and overall modularization. In contrast, the development and application of a general practitioner competency model for general practitioners in China is still being debated in theoretical research [29,30,31]. The development and deepening of research on this competency model for general practitioner means that the model is improving constantly improving. To ensure that the model is eventually be applied to training in general medicine training, the process of optimizing general medicine training in general medicine is important [32, 33]. In 2017, Shenzhen city (Guangdong Province) issued the “Shenzhen senior family doctor competency assessment guide (trial),” which indicated a “good” direction for family doctors. Senior family doctor competency includes five aspects: i.e., professional ethics and quality; communication and interpersonal skills; general diagnosis and treatment ability; personal, family, and community health-care capacities; and the ability to use and coordinate health-related resources. The assessment guide has three advantages. First, it includes abilities other than medical ability in the assessment requirements. Second, it changes the traditional mode of “emphasizing theory over practice” in the medical and health assessment system, which means that the assessment of senior family doctors is closer to their actual work. Third, the assessment content is more consistent with actual service objects, and clearly describes how senior family doctors should provide services for specific types of service objects [34].

The degree of competency among family doctors in the Changning community health service centers is generally high. This study showed that factors affecting family doctor competency in 2013 were education background, professional title, configuration of general practitioner’s team, job training, whether the specific content of the family doctor system was clear, and the ability to demonstrate their skills as a family doctor. Moreover, family doctor competency was higher with better team configuration, while the additional job training required indicated lower competency. The greater clarity about the specific content of the family doctor system was associated with higher-qualified family doctors. The greater the family doctor’s competency, the higher their sensory ability was displayed. In 2016, job training and whether the family doctor demonstrated her/his ability were key factors affecting their work competency. In recent years, Shanghai has implemented continuous specialization in general practitioner training and general practitioner team construction has been implemented in Shanghai. Therefore, the construction and application of a competency model for general practitioners may inform the evaluation and optimization of the comprehensive quality of general practitioners and the improvement of their training system. Our study was consistent with the pilot of Shenzhen Bao’an family doctor competency assessment, which emphasized practice in family doctor training and the construction of a learning team to support training effect and ability improvement. The Weifang Community Health Service Center has set up a general practitioner training center in the Pudong New Area of Shanghai. This training center is reliant on the construction of the general practitioner theory examination question bank being developed by the Fudan University General Medicine Department, through purchases of digital simulation, hardware, and a physical examination training model to establish a network video teaching system. The training center conducts theoretical assessment for all general practitioners in Pudong. Each year, 20% of general practitioners are included in rotational operation skill training and examinations, with the purpose of promoting general practitioners’ theoretical levels and business skills and updating their knowledge. This skills training aims to update the family doctors’ skills, improve health-care service levels, and support them in becoming excellent gatekeepers for residents’ health. Personal information files for general practitioners were established and the results of practical training assessments were recorded. Furthermore, these assessment results are linked to the general practitioners’ performance subsidies [35].

In China, the service package content design, collaborative referral system, and personnel training in the family doctor system are good. However, the literature shows that family physician team stability directly affects the community’s first health-care options, two-way referral, and the formation of hierarchical diagnoses and treatment and orderly patterns of medical services. In addition, one of the major difficulties in promoting services experienced by the family doctor system is the lack of enthusiasm among family doctors. This survey found that higher competency of family doctors was related to a higher sense of their ability being displayed and demonstrated, higher sense of achievement, higher satisfaction with environment/support, and better job stability. These factors may be closely related to efforts to establish standardized construction of community health service centers in Shanghai. A good health environment and uniform medical environment with uniform equipment and consistent style can improve the patients’ experience of medical treatment. Family doctors tend to be highly satisfied with their work environment, but the mechanism of economic incentives has restricted their motivation to some extent [36]. Therefore, it is important to strengthen and improve the intrinsic value of community health services’ through the cultivation of and incentives for family doctors, and also strive for a favorable external environment for health-care reform. In April 2018, the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China issued a notice requiring all localities to establish assessment and evaluation mechanisms for family doctor contracting services, incorporate them into the comprehensive performance assessment of primary medical and health institutions, organize regular assessment, and link assessment results to the total performance salary of primary medical and health institutions and the salaries of the main responsible individuals. At the same time, the Medical Reform Office of the State Council promoted the “establishment of a family doctor contracting service fee system” to improve the family doctors’ work motivation as proposed in the guidance on promoting the family doctors’ contracting service. The construction of integrated rural and urban health care in Shanghai, i.e., tertiary and secondary hospitals, and community health centers, for regional community members is responsible for ensuring residents register with their community health centers, the coordinated service system construction is promoted, and a two-way referral green channel established. In this study, we found that family doctors reported relatively high satisfaction with the coordination of their neighborhood committee, medical technologies, and general practice team, but reported relatively low satisfaction with the coordination of second- and third-level hospitals. This finding suggested that it may be necessary to optimize the function of regional medical associations, effectively improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment capability and level of grass-roots medical institutions, guide patients to use their local community health-care services, and promote the construction of an effective hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system.

Strengths and limitations

The present study has three main strengths. First, this study is a three-year follow-up study that analyzed the changes in influential factors affecting the family doctors’ work. Second, this study constructed a model of family doctors’ work competency and work stability to identify influential factors. Third, the survey of the family doctors in this study covered their work status, cognition, satisfaction, and stability, among the influential factors studied. Nevertheless, the present study has some limitations, e.g., the investigators included in the 2-year study were not all the same people in both periods; therefore, different degrees of bias may influence the results.

Conclusions

This study found that family doctors’ satisfaction is a key factor affecting their work stability. Family doctors’ work competency can affect their job stability, and their work cognition may be important for work competency and stability.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated and analyzed during the present study are not publicly available because of data sensitiveness. However, they are available from the Academic Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pudong Institute for Health Development (via yanhua373@126.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Abbreviations

WONCA:

World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Association of General Practitioners/Family Physicians

References

  1. 1.

    Holman JR, Wickizer TM. Family physician resource use for inpatient care: a comparison between military medical center and community hospital. Mil Med. 2006;171(5):365–9.

  2. 2.

    Bowman MA, Lucan SC, Rosenthal TC, et al. Family medicine research in the United States from the late 1960s into the future. Fam Med. 2017;49(4):289–95.

  3. 3.

    Malatskey L, Bar Zeev Y, Tzuk-Onn A, et al. Lifestyle medicine course for family medicine residents: preliminary assessment of the impact on knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and personal health. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1103):549–54.

  4. 4.

    General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Health and Health Plan for the “13th Five-Year” Plan. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/10/content_5158488.htm.

  5. 5.

    McClelland DC. Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". Am Psychol. 1973;28(1):1–14.

  6. 6.

    Huihui H, Hongyan L. Evaluation model and empirical study of family doctor competency in Shanghai based on meta-competence. Mod Hosp Manag. 2018;16(03):4–8.

  7. 7.

    Zhiqiang M, Min L, Hairong W. Empirical research on competency of general practitioners in community health service institutions. J Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences). 2012;32(04):514–8.

  8. 8.

    Lijiao J, Yinglei J, Tao S, Libin Y, Depin C. Study on the construction of general practitioner competency model based on exploratory factor analysis. Chin Gen Pract. 2013;16(37):3659–61.

  9. 9.

    Xiumu Y, Yulong Q, Zhengfu S, Buxin H, Bei M. The theoretical construction and empirical study of the competency model of rural general practitioners. J Southern Medical University. 2015;35(04):516–21.

  10. 10.

    Libing S, Xiaodong W, Wei H, Na L. Employment status of standardized training doctors in Shanghai general hospital. J Hosp Manag. 2018;25(07):655–7.

  11. 11.

    Liu CY, He TT, Wang Q. Responses to the supportive policies for the implementation of contracted family doctor services and job satisfaction in primary healthcare workers. Chin Gen Pract. 2019;22(10):1160–4.

  12. 12.

    Shichao Z, Jinghao W, Wei W, Shouxin Z, Qingyue M. Relationship between work stress, job burnout and turnover intention of health workers in township hospitals. Chin Health Care Manag. 2019;(04):276–9.

  13. 13.

    Min W, Jing Z, Jiangong Z, et al. Research on the status quo of family doctor service in community medical staff in Beijing. Zhonghua General Hospital. 2016;14(08):1243–6.

  14. 14.

    Huang J, Liang H, Yimin Z, et al. Analysis of factors affecting family doctor satisfaction. Chin Health Resour. 2016;19(06):507–11.

  15. 15.

    Chunyan X, Shanlian H, Jiangjiang H, et al. Thoughts and suggestions after on-the-spot observation of family doctors. Chin Gen Pract. 2012;15(31):3592–3594+3601.

  16. 16.

    Eggleston K, Ling L, Qingyue M, et al. Health service delivery in China: a literature review. Health Econ. 2008;17:149–65.

  17. 17.

    Tabenkin H, Gross R, Greenberg SB, et al. Primary care physicians in Israel: self-perception of their role in the healthcare system and policy makers' and patients' perception of them as gatekeepers. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3(12):893–7.

  18. 18.

    Olsen CG, Wong CP, Gordon RE, et al. The role of the family physician in the day care setting. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54(4):1257–65 1267–8.

  19. 19.

    Gilbert A, Maheux B, Frappier JY, et al. Adolescent care. Part 1: are family physicians caring for adolescents' mental health? Can Fam Physician. 2006;52(11):1440–1.

  20. 20.

    Reedy BL, Gregson BA, Williams M. General practitioners and postgraduate education in the northern region. J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap. 1979;(9):1–29.

  21. 21.

    Steinhäuser J, Paulus J, Roos M, et al. "General practice is a great job anyway" - a qualitative study with vocational trainees. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(2):89–96.

  22. 22.

    Easthope G, Beilby JJ, Gill GF, et al. Acupuncture in Australian general practice: practitioner characteristics. Med J Aust. 1998;169(4):197–200.

  23. 23.

    Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Presseau J, et al. General practitioners' psychosocial resources, distress, and sickness absence: a study comparing the UK and Finland. Fam Pract. 2014;31(3):319–24.

  24. 24.

    Ottmar J, Blackburn B, Phillips RL Jr, et al. Family physicians' ability to perform population management is associated with adoption of other aspects of the patient-centered medical home. Popul Health Manag. 2015;18(2):72–8.

  25. 25.

    Mash R, Almeida M, Wong WC, et al. The roles and training of primary care doctors: China, India, Brazil and South Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:93.

  26. 26.

    Rauf MA, Saeed AB. Competency assurance of general practitioners--role of regulatory authority. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57(11):573–4.

  27. 27.

    Czabanowska K, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Potter A, et al. Development of a competency framework for quality improvement in family medicine: a qualitative study. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2012;32(3):174–80.

  28. 28.

    Rauf MA, Saeed AB. Competency assurance of general practitioners-role of regulatory authority. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57(11):573–4.

  29. 29.

    Huihui HP, Li H. The evaluation model and empirical research of Shanghai family doctors based on yuan sheng Renli. Mod Hosp Manag. 2018;16(03):4–8.

  30. 30.

    Yin Tao: Family doctors should aim at five abilities. Health News. 2018-03-22 (007).

  31. 31.

    Zhenzhen W, Lei S. Study on the construction of family Doctors' quality model-taking Q District of Shanghai as an example. Hum Resour Manag. 2016;(04):165–6.

  32. 32.

    Carmassi C, Dell'Oste V, Ceresoli D, et al. Frequent attenders in general medical practice in Italy: a preliminary report on clinical variables related to low functioning. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;15:115–25.

  33. 33.

    McGrail MR, Russell DJ, Campbell DG. Vocational training of general practitioners in rural locations is critical for the Australian rural medical workforce. Med J Aust. 2016;205(5):216–21.

  34. 34.

    Health and Family Planning Commission of Shenzhen Municipality. "Shenzhen Senior Family Doctor Competency Assessment Guide (Trial)". http://wjw.sz.gov.cn/wzx/201712/t20171206_10111324.htm.

  35. 35.

    Zhu Yingjie. Community hospitals create a platform "training" family doctor. Wen Hui News 2017-06-03. https://whb.cn/zhuzhan/kandian/20170603/93778.html.

  36. 36.

    Dongyang W, Yongnian C, Peiying F, et al. Research on the status quo and satisfaction of family doctors' contract service in Jiangsu Province. Chin Gen Pract. 2018;21(19):2297–302.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank administrators in the sampled community health centers for the investigation coordination, and all those who volunteered to be interviewed. We thank Peter Fogarty, MA, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China, for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71403171) for performing the survey; Pudong New Area Health System Leading Personnel Training Program (PWRl2017–05) for data collecting; the Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission Research Project (201640382) for data analysis; and Pudong New Area Health System Key Weak Discipline Construction Funding Project (PWZbr2017–08) for writing and modifying the manuscript.

Author information

All authors participated in the design and development of the study. YMZ and DFG conducted the survey. CJL and HL performed the survey, LW and TZ dealt with data analysis. SSL, LW and TZ drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Yimin Zhang or Dongfeng Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants were provided with a plain language statement explaining the study and gave written informed consent in the questionnaire survey. The study was approved by Pudong Institute for Health Development Academic Ethics Committee (PDWSL2013–3).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Family doctors
  • Competencies
  • Stability
  • Influential factors