Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Implementation of web-based hospital specialist consultations to improve quality and expediency of general practitioners’ care: a feasibility study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Thomas van der Velden
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Harris
22 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman
2 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jing Sun
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Thomas van der Velden
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Harris
17 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman
20 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jing Sun
6 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Thomas van der Velden
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Thomas van der Velden
Resubmission - Version 5
1 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 May 2019 Editorially accepted
29 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12875-019-0960-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement