Skip to main content

Table 3 Practices and participants in the study

From: Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study

Practice

Practice type

GPs and staff

1. interview participants

2. interview participants

A priori attitude to accreditation

1

Partnership

3 GPs, 1 nurse,

2 secretaries

2 GPs, 1 nurse,

1 secretary

1 GP, 1 nurse,

1 secretary

Negative

2

Solo

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

1 GP, 2 nurses

Positive

3

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

3 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

Negative

4

Solo

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

1 GP, 1 biomedical laboratory scientist

Positive

5

Solo

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

1 GP, 1 secretary

N.A.

6

Partnership

3 GPs, 3 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

1 secretary

Positive

7

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP

1 GP

Negative

8

Partnership

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

2 GPs, 2 nurses

Negative

9a

Partnership

2 GPs, 1 secretary

2 GPs

-

Positive

10

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Negative

11

Solo

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

1 GP, 1 nurse

Positive

12

Partnership

3 GPs, 2 nurses,

2 secretaries

3 GPs, 2 nurses

3 GPs, 2 nurses

Negativeb

Positive

  1. a Survey postponed, practice excluded from the studyb Two different GPs had answered the questionnaire