Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Understanding the adoption and use of point-of-care tests in Dutch general practices using multi-criteria decision analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Kip
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Beilby
4 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Verbakel
9 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
5 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Kip
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Beilby
7 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
12 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Verbakel
23 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Kip
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Kip
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12875-018-0893-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement