NPT construct | Study themes |
---|---|
Coherence | - The Pain Platform has the potential to overcome existing access issues |
- The Pain Platform incorporates shift towards parity of esteem (valuing mental health equally with physical health) | |
- The Plain Platform is advantageous for patient access and need | |
- The Pain Platform demands an increase in professional understanding/awareness | |
Cognitive participation | - Professionals working in the Pain Platform will need to foster patient engagement |
- Availability of the Pain Platform is valued | |
- Front-line support of the Pain Platform may be variable | |
- Platform user acceptability of the Pain Platform influenced by personal beliefs | |
- The Pain Platform is aligned with existing platform procedures | |
Collective Action | - The Pain Platform implementation requires addressing professional beliefs about CWP |
- Mixed delivery methods may be required for the CWP T-CBT | |
- The Pain Platform is aligned with existing platform goals | |
- Pain Platform implementation requires additional resources | |
- Pain Platform implementation requires alignment with existing referral protocols | |
Reflexive Monitoring | - Feedback for professionals regarding impact of the Pain Platform will enhance learning |
- Need to enhance opportunities to foster good collaborative care to ensure success of the Pain Platform | |
- The Pain Platform’s success and sustainability is reliant on further development of the organisational infrastructure | |
- The Pain Platform’s success is reliant on practitioner training and support | |
- Pain Platform referral protocols need to align with existing platform procedures |