Skip to main content

Table 5 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios comparing enhanced fee-for-service to traditional fee-for-service produced from the colorectal cancer screening model

From: Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada

 

Year

Unadjusted

Adjusted for Patient Characteristics

Adjusted for Patient and Physician Characteristics

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Odds Ratio

95% CI

p-value

Immigrants

 Enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service

2005

0.91

(0.89–0.94)

<.0001

0.91

(0.88–0.94)

<.0001

0.94

(0.91–0.97)

<.0001

2006

1.02

(0.99–1.04)

0.1809

1.03

(1.01–1.05)

0.0074

1.04

(1.01–1.06)

0.0021

2007

1.21

(1.18–1.24)

<.0001

1.22

(1.19–1.26)

<.0001

1.24

(1.21–1.28)

<.0001

2008

1.13

(1.09–1.16)

<.0001

1.15

(1.11–1.19)

<.0001

1.19

(1.15–1.23)

<.0001

2009

1.19

(1.14–1.23)

<.0001

1.23

(1.19–1.28)

<.0001

1.23

(1.19–1.28)

<.0001

2010

0.99

(0.95–1.04)

0.7596

1.03

(0.98–1.07)

0.2438

1.06

(1.02–1.11)

0.007

2011

1.06

(1.01–1.11)

0.0319

1.09

(1.04–1.15)

0.0012

1.13

(1.07–1.19)

<.0001

2012

1.25

(1.18–1.32)

<.0001

1.38

(1.31–1.47)

<.0001

1.38

(1.30–1.57)

<.0001

Long-Term Residents

 Enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service

2005

1.00

(0.99–1.01)

0.5301

1.00

(0.99–1.01)

0.528

1.00

(1.00–1.01)

0.4123

2006

1.09

(1.08–1.10)

<.0001

1.10

(1.09–1.10)

<.0001

1.10

(1.09–1.11)

<.0001

2007

1.25

(1.23–1.26)

<.0001

1.26

(1.24–1.27)

<.0001

1.27

(1.25–1.28)

<.0001

2008

1.20

(1.18–1.22)

<.0001

1.23

(1.21–1.25)

<.0001

1.25

(1.23–1.27)

<.0001

2009

1.27

(1.25–1.30)

<.0001

1.31

(1.28–1.34)

<.0001

1.29

(1.26–1.32)

<.0001

2010

1.15

(1.12–1.18)

<.0001

1.17

(1.14–1.20)

<.0001

1.19

(1.16–1.22)

<.0001

2011

1.10

(1.06–1.14)

<.0001

1.11

(1.07–1.15)

<.0001

1.14

(1.10–1.18)

<.0001

2012

1.09

(1.05–1.14)

<.0001

1.17

(1.12–1.21)

<.0001

1.15

(1.11–1.20)

<.0001

Ratios of Odds Ratios

 Difference in enhanced vs. traditional fee-for-service between immigrants vs. long-term residents

2005

0.92

(0.89–0.94)

<.0001

0.91

(0.88–0.94)

<.0001

0.94

(0.91–0.96)

<.0001

2006

0.93

(0.91–0.95)

<.0001

0.94

(0.92–0.963)

<.0001

0.94

(0.92–0.96)

<.0001

2007

0.97

(0.95–1.00)

0.0508

0.97

(0.95–1.00)

0.0659

0.98

(0.95–1.01)

0.1798

2008

0.94

(0.90–0.97)

0.0002

0.93

(0.90–0.97)

<.0001

0.95

(0.91–0.98)

0.0031

2009

0.93

(0.89–0.97)

0.0009

0.94

(0.90–0.98)

0.0061

0.96

(0.92–1.00)

0.037

2010

0.87

(0.82–0.91)

<.0001

0.88

(0.84–0.93)

<.0001

0.89

(0.85–0.94)

<.0001

2011

0.96

(0.90–1.02)

0.1821

0.99

(0.93–1.05)

0.671

0.99

(0.93–1.06)

0.8325

2012

1.14

(1.07–1.22)

0.0001

1.19

(1.11–1.27)

<.0001

1.20

(1.12–1.29)

<.0001

  1. Ratios of odds ratios are also presented, with long-term residents and traditional fee-for-service serving as referent groups