The effectiveness of shared decision-making followed by positive reinforcement on physical disability in the long-term follow-up of patients with nonspecific low back pain in primary care: a clustered randomised controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Roberts|
|5 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Bach Jensen|
|2 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ariette Sanders|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Bach Jensen|
|14 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Roberts|
|29 Apr 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ariette Sanders|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Apr 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 May 2018||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12875-018-0776-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.