Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Difficult medical encounters and job satisfaction - results of a cross sectional study with general practitioners in Germany

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Katja Goetz
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laure Abensur Vuillaume
30 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc CHANELIERE
1 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katja Goetz
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katja Goetz
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Katja Goetz
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
9 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12875-018-0747-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement