This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing treatment fidelity and contamination in a cluster randomised controlled trial of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy skills in type 2 diabetes
- Nicholas Magill†1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Helen Graves†2,
- Nicole de Zoysa2,
- Kirsty Winkley2,
- Stephanie Amiel3,
- Emma Shuttlewood3,
- Sabine Landau1 and
- Khalida Ismail2, 4
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 1 November 2017
Accepted: 23 April 2018
Published: 10 May 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Nov 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vojislav Ivetić|
|29 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Boon How Chew|
|24 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Magill|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Magill|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|10 May 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12875-018-0742-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.