Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic behaviour of general practitioners when suspecting Lyme disease: a database study from 2010-2015

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnetha Hofhuis
30 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene D Shapiro
7 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François Milord
8 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryon Backenson
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Esmée Botman
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene D Shapiro
8 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François Milord
14 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnetha Hofhuis
5 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Esmée Botman
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnetha Hofhuis
8 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene D Shapiro
11 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - François Milord
14 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Esmée Botman
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Esmée Botman
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12875-018-0729-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement