This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Health professional perceptions regarding screening tools for developmental surveillance for children in a multicultural part of Sydney, Australia
- Pankaj Garg1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
- My Trinh Ha6, 7,
- John Eastwood2, 8, 9, 10, 11,
- Susan Harvey12,
- Sue Woolfenden13, 14,
- Elisabeth Murphy15,
- Cheryl Dissanayake16,
- Katrina Williams17, 18, 19,
- Bin Jalaludin20, 15,
- Anne McKenzie21,
- Stewart Einfeld22,
- Natalie Silove23, 24,
- Kate Short25, 24 and
- Valsamma Eapen26, 10, 27Email author
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 23 December 2016
Accepted: 19 March 2018
Published: 2 April 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Dworkin|
|15 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Glascoe|
|30 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pankaj Garg|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Glasscoe|
|12 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pankaj Garg|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|2 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12875-018-0728-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.