Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Cottrell
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Ifediora
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12875-018-0719-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement