This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The use of public performance reporting by general practitioners: a study of perceptions and referral behaviours
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 10 May 2017
Accepted: 29 January 2018
Published: 12 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Cottrell|
|13 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Ifediora|
|12 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Khic-Houy Prang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12875-018-0719-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.