Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of weighted means for secondary outcomes

From: The perceived impact of family physicians on the district health system in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey

Domain

N

Mean (SD)

t

p-value

Rural vs. metropolitan location

 Care provider

rural

29

3.39 (1.13)

0.441

0.661

metro

23

3.24 (1.42)

 Consultant

rural

29

3.31 (1.16)

0.468

0.642

metro

23

3.15 (1.38)

 Capacity builder

rural

29

2.99 (1.12)

0.286

0.776

metro

23

2.90 (1.23)

 Clinical trainer

rural

29

3.27 (1.19)

0.183

0.856

metro

23

3.20 (1.46)

 Clinical governance leader

rural

28

3.17 (1.30)

0.365

0.717

metro

23

3.04 (1.29)

 Champion of community-orientated primary care

rural

29

3.31 (1.18)

0.289

0.774

metro

23

3.21 (1.45)

DHS facility type

 Care provider

CHC

25

3.27 (1.14)

− 0.285

0.777

DH

27

3.37 (1.38)

 Consultant

CHC

25

3.22 (1.12)

− 0.129

0.898

DH

27

3.26 (1.38)

 Capacity builder

CHC

25

2.97 (1.04)

0.096

0.924

DH

27

2.94 (1.28)

 Clinical trainer

CHC

25

3.26 (1.15)

0.109

0.914

DH

27

3.22 (1.45)

 Clinical governance leader

CHC

24

3.26 (1.18)

0.776

0.441

DH

27

2.98 (1.38)

 Champion of community-orientated primary care

CHC

25

3.27 (1.15)

0.043

0.965

DH

27

3.26 (1.44)

New vs. previous training model

 Care provider

new

23

3.27 (1.23)

− 0.284

0.778

previous

29

3.37 (1.30)

 Consultant

new

23

3.11 (1.22)

− 0.650

0.519

previous

29

3.34 (1.29)

 Capacity builder

new

23

2.74 (1.10)

−1.208

0.233

previous

29

3.13 (1.19)

 Clinical trainer

new

23

3.07 (1.27)

− 0.842

0.404

previous

29

3.37 (1.33)

 Clinical governance leader

new

22

2.77 (1.17)

− 1.664

0.102

previous

29

3.37 (1.33)

 Champion of community-orientated primary care

new

23

3.08 (1.24)

− 0.914

0.365

previous

29

3.41 (1.34)

  1. *significant at p < 0.05