Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “I can’t bend it and it hurts like mad”: direct observation of gout consultations in routine primary health care

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zoe Paskins
22 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Liddle
8 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Dowell
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - HJEM Janssens
24 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Schlesinger
25 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Dowell
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Dowell
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Dowell
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12875-017-0662-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement