Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Correlation between patients’ reasons for encounters/health problems and population density in Japan: a systematic review of observational studies coded by the International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC) and the International Classification of Primary care (ICPC)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Karl Soler
24 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Kounalakis
24 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Makoto Kaneko
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Makoto Kaneko
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Makoto Kaneko
Resubmission - Version 4
20 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Makoto Kaneko
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12875-017-0658-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement