This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
General practitioners’ perspectives on a proposed new model of service delivery for primary care management of knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 February 2017
Accepted: 14 August 2017
Published: 7 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Paskins|
|28 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Birgitta Wiitavaara|
|31 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hakan Yaman|
|10 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Brunton|
|16 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thorlene Egerton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Paskins|
|8 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thorlene Egerton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0656-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.