This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 December 2016
Accepted: 25 July 2017
Published: 7 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michelle Howard|
|21 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Smith|
|28 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Rahul Alam|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Rahul Alam|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0650-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.