Equitable resourcing of primary health care in remote communities in Australia’s Northern Territory: a pilot study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 February 2017
Accepted: 9 June 2017
Published: 29 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shlomo Vinker|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Dennis|
|4 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ferdinando Petrazzuoli|
|27 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - John Wakerman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shlomo Vinker|
|7 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Dennis|
|27 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - John Wakerman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0646-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.