Skip to main content

Table 2 Weight reduction between intervention groups

From: Effectiveness of a motivational intervention on overweight/obese patients in the primary healthcare: a cluster randomized trial

 

Usual Care

Motivational Intervention

Fixed Model

Multi-level Model

N

Mean

SE

N

Mean

SE

OR

CI 95%

p

OR

CI 95%

p

Weight Baseline (kg)

428

87.1

0.7

393

85.5

0.7

 

Weight. 1 Year (kg)

316

85.9

0.8

287

83.7

0.9

Weight difference (kg)

302

1.3

0.1

283

1.8

0.4

0.45a

−0.47; 1.36

0.33

0.63a

−0.46; 1.73

0.26

Weight ≤ Baseline b

 

179

59.3%

 

175

61.8%

1.11

0.80; 1.55

0.53

1.18

0.78; 1.83

0.44

Weight Loss ≥ 5% b

 

50

16.6%

 

64

22.6%

1.47

0.98; 2.23

0.06

1.53

0.93; 2.56

0.09

Weight Loss ≥ 10% b

 

12

4.0%

 

19

6.7%

1.74

0.84; 3.75

0.14

1.86

0.83; 4.80

0.15

Weight. 2 Years (kg)

210

84.9

0.9

242

83.2

1

 

Weight difference (kg)

199

1.0

0.4

238

2.5

0.5

1.53a

0.31; 2.74

0.01

1.82a

0.32; 3.35

0.02

Weight ≤ Baseline b

 

111

55.8%

 

156

65.5%

1.51

1.02; 2.22

0.04

1.62

0.98; 2.77

0.06

Weight Loss ≥ 5% b

 

36

18.1%

 

64

26.9%

1.67

1.06; 2.66

0.03

1.74

1.03; 3.07

0.04

Weight Loss ≥ 10% b

 

10

5.0%

 

19

8.0%

1.64

0.76; 3.75

0.22

1.67

0.67; 4.53

0.27

  1. For each follow-up were calculated four variables:
  2. a) Weight difference was calculated as the weight in each visit minus the baseline weight, expressed in kg
  3. b) Weight ≤ Baseline Weight : If the weight in the visit was lower than the baseline weight
  4. c) Weight loss ≥ 5%: If the relative percentage loss of weight (weight difference/baseline weight) was ≥ 5%
  5. d) Weight loss ≥ 10% : If the relative percentage loss of weight (weight difference/baseline weight) was ≥ 10%
  6. adifferences of means
  7. bn(%) and chi-square Test. Kg Kilograms, p: Mann-Whitney Test