Current and future perspectives on the management of polypharmacy
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 30 January 2017
Accepted: 28 May 2017
Published: 6 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hendrik Van Den Bussche|
|28 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiane Muth|
|29 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|30 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mariam Molokhia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiane Muth|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hendrik Van Den Bussche|
|24 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mariam Molokhia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0642-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.