Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Effect of audit and feedback with peer review on general practitioners’ prescribing and test ordering performance: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Original Submission
23 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark V. Williams
4 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Presseau
7 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noah Michael Ivers
30 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Muhammad Alotaibi
12 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Bowie
27 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sofia Eilat
18 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jasper Trietsch
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jasper Trietsch
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jasper Trietsch
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jasper Trietsch
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12875-017-0605-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page