Skip to main content

Table 5 The Cronbach alpha values in previous DDS-17 validation studies

From: The validity and reliability of the English version of the diabetes distress scale for type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia

Subscales

Country the DDS-17 was validated in (language) / year

Malaysia (English) / 2016

Malaysia (Malay) / 2015 (25)

Thailand (Thai) / 2014 (43)

Denmark (Danish) / 2013 (42)

Norway (Norwegian) / 2012 (38)

Iran (Persian) / 2012 (41)

Hong Kong (Chinese) / 2011 (39)

United States (English) / 2005 (19)

Physician distress

0.78

0.82

0.85–0.963

0.83–0.893

0.81–0.873

0.71

0.85

0.88

Emotional burden

0.86

0.86

0.81

0.87

0.88

Regime distress

0.84

0.931b

0.78

0.821a

0.90

Interpersonal distress

0.81

0.77

0.88

Total

0.92

0.94

0.95

0.92

0.92

−2

0.90

0.93

  1. 1The regime distress and the interpersonal distress subscale were combined as the regime-and-social support-related distress subscalea / therapeutic support distressb
  2. 2Did not report the total DDS-17 Cronbach’s α value
  3. 3Did not report Cronbach’s α values of the individual subscales