Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patients’ anticipated actions following transient ischaemic attack symptoms: a qualitative vignette-based study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Hudon
25 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Rosenberg
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lara Maillet
5 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Parker Magin
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Rosenberg
8 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Hudon
20 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Parker Magin
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Parker Magin
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Parker Magin
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12875-017-0594-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement