Skip to main content

Table 2 Patients’ safety-relevant knowledge of OAT: Proportion of patients giving correct answers (at a single-item level)a

From: Does a complex intervention increase patient knowledge about oral anticoagulation? - a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Item no.

Item

Intervention group

Control group

Baseline

After 12 mo.

After 24 mo.

Baseline

After 12 mo.

After 24 mo.

1

Indication for oral anticoagulation

60.0%

61.3%

60.8%

60.9%

57.3%

55.7%

2

Awareness of risk treated with OAT

67.7%

67.9%

65.4%

70.6%

67.4%

64.9%

3

Duration of treatment known

70.7%

74.9%

76.8%

68.7%

69.1%

68.6%

4

Checking frequencies known

37.8%

46.5%

44.0%

36.7%

42.4%

41.2%

5

Target INR range known

37.8%

59.5%

56.9%

36.1%

45.5%

43.7%

6

Foods which contain a large amount of vitamin K

29.0%

34.1%

31.6%

30.2%

29.2%

25.3%

7

Diet-related recommendations

70.7%

68.2%

69.3%

65.5%

67.4%

66.8%

8

Safest analgesic that is available without a prescription

11.0%

25.1%

26.8%

12.7%

15.4%

13.8%

9

What to do after missing medication dose

19.5%

28.6%

30.1%

16.4%

19.9%

16.3%

10

Awareness that underdosing results in no symptoms

14.5%

15.6%

15.7%

13.7%

14.6%

10.2%

11

Interactions with OAT

20.0%

26.9%

28.3%

19.4%

22.8%

20.3%

12

Recognition of emergencies (doctor’s visit necessary)

6.3%

22.5%

16.3%

6.7%

5.9%

6.8%

13

Knowing when it is important to inform others of OAT

26.0%

35.0%

30.4%

27.8%

23.9%

19.1%

  1. aAnalyses are based on 736 patients at baseline, 702 after 12 months and 657 patients after 24 months. 12 and 24-month follow-up data for the secondary endpoint patient knowledge were available for all patients who did not drop out. After 24 months, 79 patients (10.7%) dropped out because of death or the patient’s decision to no longer participate